In my $life, I raise money from sponsors.
It is not difficult to spend money, once you have it.
It is not difficult to raise money, once you know how to spend it wisely.
What's difficult is putting the two together.
Some donors know what to contribute to - they choose specific projects
and peo
On Thursday 21 February 2008 06:25:42 Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:23 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I could take a month's sabbatical from my day job for $5000 without losing
> insurance coverage or other benefits. That's slightly more than Audrey's
> $100/day,
Me too. $500. That's 3*500, so far.
Can I do this through the Perl Foundation as an earmark?
Conrad Schneiker wrote:
On Thursday 21 February 2008 06:25:42 Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:23 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I could take a month's sabbatical from my d
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 1:24 AM
>
> > Whilst debating issues like parrot vs pugs, or single-track vs
> parellel
> > track development, can be quite interesting, especially if it induces
> > Larry to compare straight lines to mountains a
This thread on p6l should hopefully interest many p6u readers too.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Hainsworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 1:28 AM
> To: Conrad Schneiker; chromatic; p6l
> Subject: Re: Perl 6 fundraising and related topics.
>
> Me too. $
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:30 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 February 2008 03:48:13 Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
>
> > I updated pdd19 a bit in the section for macros. All relevant
> > information is taken from docs/imcc/macros.pod.
> >
> > I suggest the latter file is no longe
> From: Geoffrey Broadwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 6:20 PM
>
> On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 18:45 -0500, Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:23 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. Allow people to choose where their money will go (if that'
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:03:03AM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> No one likes bureacracy. But I feel much happier about handing over money,
> or persuading someone else to hand over money, to a group of people with
> established procedures and collective responsibility, than to some
> enthu
I think PDD19 describes the shorthand notation for invocation in
sufficient detail.
I suggest to close this ticket.
OOOWWW my tail is burnt!!! But I wasnt on the committee... promise.
Sorry about the cat...
So lets get some money into this Foundation, so that, perhaps, Larry
might possibly, if he deserves, get a little more money.
Richard
Larry Wall wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:03:03AM +0300, Richar
On Thu Sep 20 12:00:19 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thursday 20 September 2007 06:58:55 Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
>
> > On Sat Mar 10 19:15:20 2007, coke wrote:
> > > From docs/BROKEN.pod.
> > >
> > >
> > > Is this something that needs fixing?
> > >
> > > (it's in compilers/imcc/main.c)
> Whilst debating issues like parrot vs pugs, or single-track vs parellel
> track development, can be quite interesting, especially if it induces
> Larry to compare straight lines to mountains and railroads, it is likely
> to be more useful to have suggestions like chromatic's - 1month of
> dedicat
> In article
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Conrad Schneiker
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> So over the next few months, I'm planning to learn about
>> fundraising, and see what I can accomplish on behalf of Perl
>> 6 development. To that end, I'm soliciting:
>
> It's not really a money problem. It's
a patch was sent but never applied.
I suggest to apply this patch, possibly with minor changes, and close
this ticket.
Qui, 2008-02-21 às 11:15 -0800, Larry Wall escreveu:
> I was already told at the beginning of Perl 6 that nobody wanted my
> implementation skills. :)
I really wouldn't mind your implementation skills being used in SMOP ;).
daniel
(forgot to cc list first time, you'll see this text twice in the ticket
history)
this issue seems to be resolved.
no reply was given on an earlier suggestion to close this ticket (i
probably forgot to cc the list)
I suggest to close this ticket.
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #51086]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51086 >
Howdy,
" ft=pir" was removed from the codas in languages/c99/c99.pir and
language
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think PDD19 describes the shorthand notation for invocation in
> sufficient detail.
>
> I suggest to close this ticket.
>
>
+1
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #51104]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51104 >
during the build of languages/c99, specifically:
..\..\parrot.exe -o src\CPP_PGE2AST.pbc
Hi everyone,
Guess it's time for me to finally join the discussion. :-) I've been paying
attention to this thread since it started.
> > Which made me think ... wasn't this why Mozilla created a corporation?
>
I believe one can find online write-ups from the people involved with the
decision to
> I've seen that Daniel Ruoso applied for a grant for his smop project,
> basically a virtual machine and fast backend for kp6, and perhaps other
> implementations.
>
> TPF decided not to invest into yet another implementation.
I appreciate that it is a subtle distinction to make, too subtle to
r
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
Someone earlier in this thread mentioned that this can't be done
directly because of rules surrounding TPF's non-profit status. Someone
else pointed out the problems with TPF officers benefitting directly
from the donations, even though some of the
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
I am mostly ignoring the rest of what others have said in this thread
because I think it is detracting from your intention of getting money to
people to work more. Here is one thing that has frustrated me about TPF.
They are a non-profit organization.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's what made me come to the conclusion that it's really "The Parrot
> Foundation".
It's not The Parrot Foundation. It's that NLNet gave a very large
targeted grant for Parrot. It's a single big donation that's driving
that.
I'm wo
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what made me come to the conclusion that it's really "The Parrot
Foundation".
As brian mentioned, the NLNet grant is what's driving the Parrot work.
AFAIK, there haven't been any Parrot-related grants for a long time
besides that one and t
On Friday 22 February 2008 08:45:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Modified:
>trunk/src/pmc/parrotinterpreter.pmc
>
> Log:
> In thawfinish, delay setting constant flag on lib_name until
> Parrot_load_lib has been called, to avoid corruption in iglobals during GC.
> This fixes segfault attempting t
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #51114]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51114 >
As noted on IRC tonight:
22:35 also, if a CLA is required for commit access,
# New Ticket Created by Zev Benjamin
# Please include the string: [perl #51112]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51112 >
I would appreciate if someone would look over this patch before
committing it. I'm open
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #51106]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51106 >
Howdy,
Revision 24346 removed two tests from t/pmc/timer.t
http://svn.perl.org/v
Patch applied in r25999. Thanks, Matt.
Coke:
Last weekend I applied a patch in r25788 which corrected persistent
problems in src/list.c and thereby enabled t/src/intlist.t to pass for
the first time in a month.
In this RT, you report that t/src/intlist.t is again failing -- this
time failing all its tests.
Was t/src/intlist.t passing
Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
t/compilers/imcc/syn/macro...21/33
# Failed test (t/compilers/imcc/syn/macro.t at line 298)
# ''
# doesn't match '/End of file reached/
# '
# './parrot -D40 --gc-debug
"/Users/jimk/work/parrot/t/compilers/imcc/sy
On Friday 22 February 2008 19:33:12 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
-- c
On Feb 22, 2008, at 9:38 PM, chromatic wrote:
Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
What is the fix we're talking about?
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Friday 22 February 2008 19:41:28 Andy Lester wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2008, at 9:38 PM, chromatic wrote:
> >> Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
> > Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
> What is the fix we're talking about?
My patch in r50920, which you revert
>
> The test passed at 25900.
>
and it passed at 25950. I'll have to pick up on this tomorrow.
On Fri Feb 22 19:38:42 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Friday 22 February 2008 19:33:12 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
>
> Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
>
I should have spoken more precisely. The revision at wh
On Feb 22, 2008, at 10:18 PM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
The test passed at 25900.
and it passed at 25950. I'll have to pick up on this tomorrow.
OK, I know what I did to break it. I'm going to see if I can get it
to fail on OS X and then fix it the real way, rather than the way
ch
> >
> > Test::Builder was first released with perl 5.006002
> > Test::More was first released with perl 5.006002
> > Test::Simple was first released with perl 5.006002
AFAICT, the versions of these three modules found in lib/Test/ are all
0.60. Presumably, that version was included because it h
39 matches
Mail list logo
