# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #50448]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50448 >
When an exception occurs and exits Parrot, some of the memory allocated by
IMCC can go unf
# New Ticket Created by Michael Stephens
# Please include the string: [perl #50444]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50444 >
Variable was declared at the top of a function and then redeclared
inside of a loo
Hi
t/postconfigure/03-revision1/8
is taking forever in my powerbook pro.
Running with -v we get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] parrot]$ prove -v t/postconfigure/03-revision.t
t/postconfigure/03-revision..
1..8
ok 1 - Changed to temporary directory for testing
ok 2 - Able to make li
Just because someone will ask:
perl 5.8.8
parrot r25407
Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi
t/postconfigure/03-revision1/8
is taking forever in my powerbook pro.
Running with -v we get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] parrot]$ prove -v t/postconfigure/03-revision.t
t/postconfigure/03-revision
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Alberto Simões wrote:
> Hi
>
> t/postconfigure/03-revision1/8
>
> is taking forever in my powerbook pro.
I'd guess that this is the same problem reported in
[perl #50218]: Uninitialized svk install hangs
postconfig/03-revision.t and Parrot::Revi
On Friday 01 February 2008 12:10:22 Alberto Simões wrote:
> Alberto Simões wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Let me guess - you've got svk installed, but never used it. Try 'n'
> >> instead of Ctrl-C. svk is asking (unnecessarily, one might conclude)
> >> if you
> >> want to create the l
hi,
for people starting to use PAST nodes, it might be difficult to get started,
or not very clear what you can do with it. For instance, suppose you have a
certain language construct to translate, you need to figure out which past
nodes you have to create, and what attributes.
would it be an ide
Alberto Simões wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok 3 - Able to make Parrot dir
ok 4 - Able to copy Parrot::Revision
After a C^c
ok 5 - Got numeric value for reversion number
Let me guess - you've got svk installed, but never used it. Try 'n'
instead of Ctrl-C. svk is asking (unnecessarily
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok 3 - Able to make Parrot dir
ok 4 - Able to copy Parrot::Revision
After a C^c
ok 5 - Got numeric value for reversion number
Let me guess - you've got svk installed, but never used it. Try 'n'
instead of Ctrl-C. svk is asking (unnecessarily, one might conclude) if
On Feb 1, 2008 3:24 PM, Klaas-Jan Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> for people starting to use PAST nodes, it might be difficult to get started,
> or not very clear what you can do with it. For instance, suppose you have a
> certain language construct to translate, you need to figure out wh
On Friday 01 February 2008 14:00:52 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think that runs into the wish to not get into the internals of
> svn/svk/git in doing these tests. Not sure I agree, but that was a comment
> I saw somewhere. It does seem svk could have a "are you setup?" query or
> not start setup
On Friday 01 February 2008 15:01:33 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: petdance
> Date: Fri Feb 1 15:01:32 2008
> New Revision: 25410
>
> Modified:
>trunk/include/parrot/warnings.h
>trunk/src/warnings.c
>
> Log:
> print_pbc_location needs to be PARROT_API for t/src/warnings.t to work
Bug
On Feb 1, 2008, at 5:07 PM, chromatic wrote:
Do we really need to export 16,000 symbols? We ought to be *removing*
PARROT_API, not adding it.
Agreed, and that's why I've added -fvisibility=hidden to the
automagically derived warnings. That way we can pull stuff out and
see how things g
On Friday 01 February 2008 15:34:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: petdance
> Date: Fri Feb 1 15:34:35 2008
> New Revision: 25412
>
> Modified:
>trunk/src/ops/var.ops
>
> Log:
> consting
>
> Modified: trunk/src/ops/var.ops
> --- trunk/src/ops/var.ops (original)
> +++ trunk/src/ops/va
On Friday 01 February 2008 15:41:34 Andy Lester wrote:
> > Any reason not to write:
> >
> > PMC *result = PMC_IS_NULL(lex_pad) ? NULL : VTABLE...;
> No reason in my book, but I got a general anti-ternary vibe in the
> past from the p2 crew.
Anything that gets us an extra const *and* limits t
Do we really need to export 16,000 symbols? We ought to be *removing*
PARROT_API, not adding it.
The bulk of those are autogenerated in the PMCs, of course.
What about unused functions? Look at, say, Parrot_char_digit_value()
in src/string_primitives.c. It's PARROT_API for no apparent re
Any reason not to write:
PMC *result = PMC_IS_NULL(lex_pad) ? NULL : VTABLE...;
This assignment seems like a simple case, and you get a nice const
opportunity
for free.
No reason in my book, but I got a general anti-ternary vibe in the
past from the p2 crew.
--
Andy Lester =>
On Friday 01 February 2008 15:42:41 Andy Lester wrote:
> > Do we really need to export 16,000 symbols? We ought to be *removing*
> > PARROT_API, not adding it.
> The bulk of those are autogenerated in the PMCs, of course.
I have a plan. If we're cloning parent PMC vtables anyway, we only have
I'm also suggesting that we prune old unused docs, starting with:
=head1 HISTORY
Initial version 2004.06.11 by Matt Fowles
Not to pick on Matt (since much of these are by Leo), but I see zero
value in this used-once boilerplate. Anyone mind if I get rid of it
as I come across it?
I hacked the headerizer to do double duty as a lister of everything
marked PARROT_API in the main C source files. It skips the PMCs. The
make target is "make apilist".
It's crude, but ought to make it easy to skim for things that
shouldn't be marked PARROT_API.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lest
20 matches
Mail list logo
