On Thursday 24 January 2008 23:20:45 chromatic wrote:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:11:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Modified:
> >trunk/src/exceptions.c
> > Log:
> > Added missing break to switch statement (!!!). Added checks for NULL
> > pointers
> Did you test this with make testC a
>
> Using the "Strawberry Perl" on Windows XP to install Parrot resulted in
> the attached warnings output from the make step.
>
I'll try a stronger glue this time; maybe they'll stay attached.
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.
I'm working from an svn fetched version - but the 03-revision.t goes
out, makes a tmp dir, puts in a cache file .parrot_current_rev (w/ 16000
in it) file and a Makefile so the call to Parrot::Revision::current runs:
sub _get_revision {
my $revision;
if (-f $cache and ! -f 'Makefile') {
Hello.
As I said in a previous message, there are two casts in pf_items.c
that are unnecessary and seems to be wrong.
This patch removes both, avoiding warnings. Tested in Ubuntu 7.10 on
Intel platform.
--
Salu2
Index: src/packfile/pf_items.c
On Thu Jan 24 10:31:46 2008, coke wrote:
>
> I think this helps verify my original claim, but how to address it?
>
What would happen if in config/auto/gmp.pm we had some code similar to
that found in config/auto/readline.pm?
sub _init {
my $self = shift;
my %data;
$data{descriptio
On Jan 25, 2008 6:14 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2008 11:43:35 Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
>
> > 'languages/perl5' currently servers only as a container for some old
> > PMCs, that probably
> > nobody uses or cares about.
> >
> > Can I remove 'languages/perl5' ?
I committed a fix for this in r25229: a simple substitution of 'gmtime'
for 'localtime'. See attached.
It will not, however, be visible on the web page until the webmasters
install the revised version of smokeserv-server.pl.
kid51
Index: tools/util/smokeserv-server.pl
=
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #50258]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50258 >
In t/harness we find the following:
## FIXME: ###
# This is a temporary solut
On Friday 25 January 2008 11:43:35 Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> 'languages/perl5' currently servers only as a container for some old
> PMCs, that probably
> nobody uses or cares about.
>
> Can I remove 'languages/perl5' ?
+1 from me, unless there's some interest in any way not merely historical.
# New Ticket Created by NotFound
# Please include the string: [perl #50238]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50238 >
Hello.
As I said in a previous message, there are two casts in pf_items.c
that are unnecess
Hello.
I sent to the list the message to parrotbug, and later to parrotbug
the apology message to the list, sorry.
--
Salu2
I will try to look at this over the weekend.
> Hi, Alan! What kind of CPU do you have? If you have an AMD Athlon XP
> (or something of similar lineage), I think I know what the problem is.
>
I think you've nailed it: Athlon XP-M.
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.com
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #50244]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50244 >
Hi,
'languages/perl5' currently servers only as a container for some old
PMCs,
# New Ticket Created by NotFound
# Please include the string: [perl #50240]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50240 >
Sorry, wrong address.
--
Salu2
At this point in our work, it is expected that 'make' will generate
warnings. Consider them data for further research. So there's no cause
for panic here.
But I'm unclear: Did 'make' complete successfully? I.e., did you end
up with a './parrot' executable in your top-level sandbox?
kid51
On Friday 25 January 2008 07:46:32 Andy Lester wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 2:16 AM, chromatic wrote:
> > Did you test this with make testC and make testj?
> I'm unaware of testC and testj. So no.
Okay.
> I'm looking at the Makefile, and I guess I'm not understanding the
> differences between
On Jan 25, 2008, at 2:16 AM, chromatic wrote:
Did you test this with make testC and make testj?
I'm unaware of testC and testj. So no.
I'm looking at the Makefile, and I guess I'm not understanding the
differences between the various cores.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.pe
> But I'm unclear: Did 'make' complete successfully? I.e., did you end
> up with a './parrot' executable in your top-level sandbox?
>
Yes. And when I made Perl 6, it said "Hello (&c)".
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
