# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #50092]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50092 >
This is a placeholder ticket so we can show a dependency on #39930.
In the "strin
Hi all,
I'm in the process of refactoring existing pugs test suite,
for example t/builtins, into t/spec/S29-.
Questions:
- @array.uniq is not mentioned in S29.
Should it be in S29/List? or S29/Array?
- cis(), polar() and friends belong to S29/Num
while they should probably belong to S2
# New Ticket Created by Stuart Jansen
# Please include the string: [perl #50074]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50074 >
This makes implementing lolcode ifthen support a tiny bit easier.
It looks like simili
Author: jkeenan
Date: Mon Jan 21 19:26:51 2008
New Revision: 25121
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd09_gc.pod
Log:
Correct POD formatting errors in two locations: incorrect use of '=for' blocks.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd09_gc.pod
==
On 22/01/2008, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2008 08:58:25 Paul Cochrane wrote:
>
> > when building parrot on Solaris I get most of the way through the
> > build, but right at the end, building pbc_to_exe fails with the
> > following output:
>
> > It seems that the Mak
On Jan 22, 2008 2:38 AM, Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 22/01/2008, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 21 January 2008 08:58:25 Paul Cochrane wrote:
> >
> > > when building parrot on Solaris I get most of the way through the
> > > build, but right at the end, buildi
uniqua:~ $ cat ~/bin/vgr
#!/bin/sh
make perl6
valgrind \
--suppressions=/home/andy/parrot/tools/dev/parrot.supp \
--num-callers=500 \
--leak-check=full \
--leak-resolution=high \
--show-reachable=yes \
./parrot --leak-test languages/perl6/perl6.pbc -e 'say "Hello,
world
New release 0.5.2 (r25150) still fails to build on PPC running OSX
10.5.1. Same version of perl as listed previously in the bug report.
The same error is issued:
...
perl tools/build/c2str.pl --all
src/string.c
src/ops/core_ops.c
src/ops/debug.ops: In function ‘Parrot_debug_break’:
src/ops/
Edwin Steiner (via RT) wrote:
I found that rakudo segfaults when the following statements are
executed interactively:
Oops, I told RT but I didn't tell p6i:
This is the same bug as #49758; merging tickets.
--
Grr... don't get me started on Wagner. The man couldn't resolve a
dominant seventh t
Hello
I'm trying to clean some warnings in parrot C source files and found
this casts in packfile/pf_items.c:
fetch_buf_le_8(u.buf, (unsigned char *) b);
fetch_buf_be_8(u.buf, (unsigned char *) b);
But the function definitions are (in src/byteorder.c):
void
fetch_buf_le_8(ARGOUT(unsigned char
Glimmerings of a hint of progress.
Adding --miniparrot to the command line:
C:\parrot>Configure.pl --cc=bcc32 --miniparrot
bypasses the test that hangs. This enables "make" to fall on its face with
the following message:
C:\parrot>make
MAKE Version 5.2 Copyright (c) 1987, 2000 Borland
Error
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #50118]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50118 >
Currently rakudo has a Perl6Str PMC type, which is then subclassed
into a 'Str' cl
>From http://osdir.com/ml/lib.libtom/2005-01/msg00010.html:
"By default common symbols are not included in static
archive table of contents. If you use the ranlib(1) -c
option you can get Linux behavior."
And from 'man ranlib' on 10.4.11:
-c Include common symbols as definitions with respe
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:24:52PM +0100, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm in the process of refactoring existing pugs test suite,
> for example t/builtins, into t/spec/S29-.
>
> Questions:
>
> - @array.uniq is not mentioned in S29.
> Should it be in S29/List? or S29/Array?
List, wh
On Tuesday 22 January 2008 15:20:25 Allison Randal via RT wrote:
> From http://osdir.com/ml/lib.libtom/2005-01/msg00010.html:
>
> "By default common symbols are not included in static
> archive table of contents. If you use the ranlib(1) -c
> option you can get Linux behavior."
>
> And from 'man
On Tue Jan 22 14:02:30 2008, ajr wrote:
>
> Any suggestions for further floundering would be welcome.
>
Well, here's one thought. You could try running Configure.pl with the
addition of the --configure_trace option. Read the POD for
Parrot::Configure::Trace to see how you would then be able t
Author: larry
Date: Tue Jan 22 16:17:20 2008
New Revision: 14493
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Clarification of timing and defaults for initializing various declarators
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
On Tue Jan 22 14:02:30 2008, ajr wrote:
>
> Glimmerings of a hint of progress.
>
> Adding --miniparrot to the command line:
>
> C:\parrot>Configure.pl --cc=bcc32 --miniparrot
>
> bypasses the test that hangs.
That's not too surprising, as a look into the configuration step classes
will show.
On Tue Jan 22 14:02:30 2008, ajr wrote:
>
> Any suggestions for further floundering would be welcome.
>
Well, here's one thought. You could try running Configure.pl with the
addition of the --configure_trace option. Read the POD for
Parrot::Configure::Trace to see how you would then be able t
On Tue Jan 22 15:38:11 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Are you building a static or a shared binary? Did this problem only
> show up after Coke switched the default to shared?
Shared. I don't know the exact timing of the change in relation to the
failure starting. But, changing config/init/hi
Author: larry
Date: Tue Jan 22 16:29:21 2008
New Revision: 14494
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
More tweaks, typos, clarification that "our" differs from in Perl 5
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Wait. There are two different phases called START and BEGIN? That's
going to be a little confusing Which one comes first?
Are there both END and STOP phases as well?
On 1/22/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: larry
> Date: Tue Jan 22 16:29:21 2008
> New Revision: 144
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:47:15PM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
: Wait. There are two different phases called START and BEGIN? That's
: going to be a little confusing Which one comes first?
: Are there both END and STOP phases as well?
BEGIN/CHECK/INIT/END are just as in Perl 5. For the rest,
Author: larry
Date: Tue Jan 22 18:07:38 2008
New Revision: 14495
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
Clarify that START is allowed to use parameter values on first call while INIT
is not.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:55:35PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: http://perlcabal.org/syn/S04.html#Closure_traits
Or since that's kind of hard to follow the text, you may prefer to
read the original POD without the interpolated test results at:
https://svn.perl.org/perl6/doc/trunk/design/syn
25 matches
Mail list logo
