Jerry Gay via RT wrote:
applied as r24965.
it's causing a heck of a lot of failing tests. however, i'll leave them
in for a day or three, while we see what we can do to get them passing.
hint: getting 'fudge' working on rakudo would do us a world of good.
~jerry
Do you mean running:
perl6
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #49912]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49912 >
The following text shows the result of attempting to install Parrot using
bcc32. Th
I noticed that many test files contain "old" POD like this:
=pod
some description here
=cut
Should that all be replaced by the new POD?
=begin description
text here
=end description
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
binw4ZB5qqTyC.bin
Description:
applied with modifications as r24962.
~jerry
On Thu Jan 17 17:26:45 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The following text shows the result of attempting to install Parrot
> using
> bcc32. The program appeared to hang at the "Generating CPU specific
> stuff"
> stage until killed.
>
> C:\parrot>Configure.pl --cc=bcc32
> Parrot Version 0.5.2 Conf
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:54:11AM +0100, Moritz Lenz wrote:
: I noticed that many test files contain "old" POD like this:
:
: =pod
:
: some description here
:
: =cut
:
:
: Should that all be replaced by the new POD?
:
: =begin description
:
: text here
:
: =end description
Jah, so glaube
On Jan 17, 2008 5:26 PM, via RT arocker @ vex. net
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> # Please include the string: [perl #49912]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49912 >
>
The patch attached refactors lib/Parrot/Revision.pm and all the files
that use it directly or indirectly.
On Tue Jan 15 09:31:18 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Having looked a bit more at Parrot::Revision and the instances where it
> is used, I *think* we can make it go away completely, at leas
>
> When using a non-default C compiler, you will usually need to add a
> --link to the Configure line. So, something like...
>
> Configure.pl --cc=bcc32 --link=bcc32
>
Doesn't appear to make any difference.
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:56:12PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:18:32PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: > +=item *
: > +
: > +The definition of C<.true> for the most ancestral type (that is, the
: > +C type) is equivalent to C<.defined>.
:
: Would we normally c
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:16:39AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: Though it's not quite the same, since the prefix presumably forces
: a multiple dispatch to Perl's idea of notiness, while a direct .not
: method would rely on the the object's notion of notiness. This is
: probably a good distinction f
On Wed Sep 12 17:50:04 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat May 05 10:05:58 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat May 05 10:04:24 2007, jkeen at verizon.net wrote:
> > > Patch applied in r18427 May 05 2007.
> >
> > I'm leaving the ticket open in the hope that some project member who
> > us
On Jan 18, 2008 7:39 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note: Application of the patch attached entails a change in behavior.
> It will no longer be possible to say:
>
> svn update
> perl Configure.pl
> svn update (assuming a new revision number is displayed)
> make
>
> .
Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 22:38 -0700, Paul Seamons wrote:
I am starting to implement a GLUT and OpenGL binding for Parrot.
[...]
I don't often get concentrated time
to help out with Parrot and Perl 6, but I have some now. If this is
going to be blocked indefinitely, my
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 17:25 +1300, Allison Randal wrote:
> Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 22:38 -0700, Paul Seamons wrote:
> >>> I am starting to implement a GLUT and OpenGL binding for Parrot.
> [...]
> > I don't often get concentrated time
> > to help out with Parrot and Perl
On Friday 18 January 2008 20:25:16 Allison Randal wrote:
> It's true that the generalized solution for varying callback signatures
> doesn't exist yet, but it's easy enough to create your own C callback
> layer, with a separate C function for each callback you need. (Note, not
> one-per-signature,
Here's my crazy idea.
When you register a callback into PIR from C, you need to pass a few
arguments: the interpreter into which to call, the PMC Sub to call, and the C
signature of the C function which gets called from C.
I presume that the PIR function will get called through one of the exter
Just added a "Perl 6 Articles and Presentations" section to the Perl 6 wiki:
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index.cgi?perl_6_articles_and_presentati
ons
(It's the last item listed under "Introduction" on the Perl 6 wiki home
page.)
Best regards,
Conrad Schneiker
www.AthenaLab.com
http://w
19 matches
Mail list logo
