--
Will "Coke" Coleda
On Dec 27, 2007, at 1:09 PM, "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 07:56:35PM +0200, Allison Randal wrote:
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 07:15:40PM +0200, Allison Randal wrote:
With autoboxing/unboxing, there's n
Hi all,
I was wondering about this - people keep on asking about "when it will
be finnished" - I'm more interested in "can I do X in it" where X is
something I'm interested in and/or something I can contribute to
and/or something that I consider important for production code I want
to migrate to p
On Dec 28, 2007 5:34 AM, Aaron Trevena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering about this - people keep on asking about "when it will
> be finnished" - I'm more interested in "can I do X in it" where X is
> something I'm interested in and/or something I can contribute to
> and/or s
Should we be allowing negative in the PMC elements() functions? Seems
to me they'd be more appropriate as UINTVALs.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
I went ahead and answered my own question by first writing regression
tests for auto::gc as it stood, then consolidating all the
'libc'-handling code in one stanza, then re-running the tests. All code
is now covered. Refactored module and 6 test files committed in r24248.
Resolving ticket.
kid5
A little more refactoring in config/auto/jit.pm, plus one more test
file, done in r24249.
On Friday 28 December 2007 07:09:24 Andy Lester wrote:
> Should we be allowing negative in the PMC elements() functions? Seems
> to me they'd be more appropriate as UINTVALs.
I can't think of any reason they could be negative. Can you make a patch to
convert them and see if anything breaks?
-
On Dec 28, 2007, at 12:17 PM, chromatic wrote:
Should we be allowing negative in the PMC elements() functions?
Seems
to me they'd be more appropriate as UINTVALs.
I can't think of any reason they could be negative. Can you make a
patch to
convert them and see if anything breaks?
A
From: Aaron Trevena
> I'm more interested in "can I do X in it"
> where X is something I'm interested in
> and/or something I can contribute to
Just wanted to make sure that you knew about the official Perl 6, Parrot,
and Perl 5 wikis:
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index.cgi
ht
On Friday 28 December 2007 04:15:03 Will Coleda wrote:
> My concern here is HLL interop. I think it would be cleaner to specify
> the base types ( or perhaps a does ) to be generic enough to let
> another language invoke your multis.
With regard to autoboxing situations, you think the compiler sh
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 12:37:56PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> On Friday 28 December 2007 04:15:03 Will Coleda wrote:
>
> > My concern here is HLL interop. I think it would be cleaner to specify
> > the base types ( or perhaps a does ) to be generic enough to let
> > another language invoke your mul
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #49168]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49168 >
Currently the most frequently asked question (by far) about perl6
is "how can I j
The attached patch adds decoding of call/return registers to the
disassembler, and also fixes a segfault; both are byproducts of a long
and otherwise fruitless debugging session. Please let me know what you
think.
-- Bob Rogers
13 matches
Mail list logo
