# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #48467]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48467 >
Using assign with an Object causes it to create a Ref
instead of assigning a copy
On Sunday 09 December 2007 22:04:30 Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> I download pugs and parrot from
> SVN repositories, written tests - one of which still hangs the
> compilation of pugs. Indeed the test I wrote for pugs concerned the
> ability of pugs to use existing CPAN modules. I have tried parro
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Again, let me know if you need more.
I pushed it far enough that I was able to repeat the deadlock hang on OS
10.4.11, that's good. The interesting thing was the order of operations.
The usual order is:
call to Parrot_cx_init_scheduler
initializing scheduler runloop
s
On Dec 11, 2007 8:43 AM, Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
>
> > In order to draw attention to this point, I changed the subject.
> >
> > Is there anybody who thinks the removal from PIR of $-less registers
> > ("absolute" or PASM regist
At 10:23 AM +0300 12/11/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Darren Duncan wrote:
At 9:04 AM +0300 12/10/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Equally, Something to replace CGI or DBI will be essential to the
uptake of P6. I would far prefer to have a skilled and resourceful
professional, such as yourself or
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Where might a volunteer start?
I also promised Yuval that I'd refactor Test::TAP::Model to use
Test::Harness 3.00 - so to some extent I've answered my own question -
but I'd like to get my hands dirty with Parrot proper too.
There's a tricky spot at the very beginning
On Dec 11, 2007 8:43 AM, Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Parrot provides a calling convention, but does not, that I know of,
mandate that calling convention. In any computer, there are multiple
calling conventions used(often leading to a lack of interoperability,
but nevertheless
On 11 Dec 2007, at 04:57, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Andy" == Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> Rubinus (new Ruby runtime)
Andy> http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/12/engine-yard-bets-big-rubinius
I'm trying to figure out why Rubinous is building a squeak-like vm
when squeak already
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, James Keenan wrote:
> The patch attached proposes to refactor Parrot configuration step
> class inter::progs into two classes: inter::compiler and inter::progs.
>
> inter::compiler will search for a C compiler, process any --cc option
> set on the command line and, if in
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:36:19AM -0600, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
>I understand that | and || may not actually be differentiated in
>implementation yet, but they do different things according to the spec.
>I've attached a patch for NQP to change | to || in places where I think it
>
>From: Andy Dougherty via RT
>Date: 2007/12/11 Tue AM 08:38:17 CST
>Subject: Re: [perl #48459] [PATCH]: Refactor config/inter/progs.pm into 2
>config steps
>
>I don't think this will work. Specifically, to conduct a "basic test of
>that compiler's functioning" you need to compile *and link*
> "Andy" == Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> Or perhaps somebody could podcast an interview with them? :)
Perhaps you were joking, but I noted that as a potential show for FLOSS
Weekly. Thanks for the idea.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 5
On 11 Dec 2007, at 17:28, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Andy" == Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> Or perhaps somebody could podcast an interview with them? :)
Perhaps you were joking, but I noted that as a potential show for
FLOSS
Weekly. Thanks for the idea.
Not joking jus
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 03:58:38 Andy Armstrong wrote:
> It'd be interesting to get all these folk who are working on VMs
> around a table to chat about their respective rationales.
That may happen in early February. It did happen for a bit at Foo Camp this
summer.
> Or perhaps somebody co
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Jim Keenan wrote:
> >From: Andy Dougherty via RT
> >Date: 2007/12/11 Tue AM 08:38:17 CST
> >Subject: Re: [perl #48459] [PATCH]: Refactor config/inter/progs.pm into 2
> >config steps
>
> >
> >I don't think this will work. Specifically, to conduct a "basic test of
> >that
Task description:
Add an opcode 'copy' to src/ops/set.ops. Similar to 'clone'.
- It takes two PMC arguments
- It calls VTABLE_morph on $1, and then VTABLE_assign on the two.
- It needs to call VTABLE_type to get the type of the source PMC to pass
to 'morph' instead of calling $1->vtable->base_t
The reports of find_name's death are greatly exaggerated. Rejecting ticket.
Pm
On 11 Dec 2007, at 09:20, Allison Randal wrote:
Coding is just a little bit zen. "Programmer who can catch a fly
with chopsticks can accomplish anything."
Nah, I couldn't possibly code while I was running around trying to hit
a fly with a stick :)
I guess once I get some headspace I'll ju
On 11 Dec 2007, at 22:39, Tim Bunce wrote:
Perhaps new contributors could make notes about stumblings blocks
encountered along the way, so we know where to put signposts for
others
who follow.
Good plan. I'll keep notes.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:20:39AM +0200, Allison Randal wrote:
> Andy Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> Where might a volunteer start?
>>
>> I also promised Yuval that I'd refactor Test::TAP::Model to use
>> Test::Harness 3.00 - so to some extent I've answered my own question - but
>> I'd like to get my ha
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, James Keenan wrote:
>
>> The patch attached proposes to refactor Parrot configuration step
>> class inter::progs into two classes: inter::compiler and inter::progs.
>>
Are we at any risk of redoing work here? Other OSS projects must
presumably have faced the same problems.
duh. I'll learn to finish reading all the posts before adding my own
*someday*.
--- Darren Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:23 AM +0300 12/11/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> >Darren Duncan wrote:
> >>At 9:04 AM +0300 12/10/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> >>>Equally, Something to replace
It also helps that you consistently make incisive observations and
contributions to conversations, even if they are a little tart
sometimes. :)
But on this general note, is there any current organization or location
where small problems are being parcelled out? I'd love to help, but my
time is as
Steve Peters' posting didn't make it to RT, so I'm excerpting it here.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hints/linux.pm should really have separate flags for even g++, since
some warnings just don't work on g++.
I think it would be good if we could break out compilers separately
from the operating system
Resolved by withdrawal.
Paul Hodges wrote:
But on this general note, is there any current organization or location
where small problems are being parcelled out? I'd love to help, but my
time is as limited as everyone's If I could get small bites of work
to do, maybe I could contribute something useful.
Anyone reque
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #48493]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48493 >
Pursuant to discussion between Andy Dougherty and myself in http://
rt.perl.org/rt3/Tic
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #48495]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48495 >
... and should be in the src/ directory.
It's referenced in a lot of places (docs, build
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #48497]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48497 >
When building parrot, we get the following warning:
setstdout_p
On Dec 11, 2007 12:40 PM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Jim Keenan wrote:
>
> > >From: Andy Dougherty via RT
> > >Date: 2007/12/11 Tue AM 08:38:17 CST
> > >Subject: Re: [perl #48459] [PATCH]: Refactor config/inter/progs.pm into
> > >2 config steps
> >
> > >
> >
Now that I've got all but one function headerized, I'm running splint.
One of the things that splint is good at, and the reason I did all the
PARROT_CAN(NOT)_RETUN_NULL flags, is it'll keep track of when something
could be NULL or not. So splint complains here:
char * const p = malloc(n);
p->foo
On Tue Dec 11 10:41:18 2007, doughera wrote:
[snip]
>
> I think you're missing three things:
>
> cc_build() consults the global $conf, and hence doesn't need it passed
> in.
> I would certainly agree that the flow of information isn't well
> controlled
> here. Passing the object in sometimes and
From: Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:51:52 +0200
The thing is, PIR doesn't respect the register numbers anyway (even in
the so-called "absolute" registers). So P33 in the PIR source may
compile down to P0, and P0 in the PIR source may compile down to
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 12:35:19 Allison Randal via RT wrote:
> Task description:
>
> Add an opcode 'copy' to src/ops/set.ops. Similar to 'clone'.
>
> - It takes two PMC arguments
>
> - It calls VTABLE_morph on $1, and then VTABLE_assign on the two.
>
> - It needs to call VTABLE_type to get th
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #48507]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48507 >
The n_add, n_sub, etc. opcodes don't seem to work when an object
is used as the fi
Tonight I've been working on getting the headerizer to automagically
update the comment blocks for each function in a .c file (.pmc files
will come later). The goal here is twofold:
1) The documentation is always consistent, because the declaration-
based documentation is computer-generated
36 matches
Mail list logo
