On 09/11/2007, Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you test the exec runcore? I don't think any of that code is used
> outside of the exec runcore so you aren't actually testing that code.
I'll have a go at testing against the exec runcore and see what turns
up. This is likely something
Currently, Parrot configuration step #32 is gen::cpu, while step #50
is auto:cpu. Let's do a diff between their respective packages (at
r22775):
[parrot] 504 $ diff -w config/gen/cpu.pm config/auto/cpu.pm > ~/learn/
parrot/diff.gen.auto.cpu.txt
1c1
< # Copyright (C) 2001-2006, The Perl Fou
One of the test files I wrote for configuration step class auto::alignptrs,
t/configure/124-auto_alignptrs-05.t, has been getting failure reports on one
particular test -- but not on all platforms, and not on a platform I have
access to.
I would like to follow up with the folks running these sm
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #47313]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47313 >
The description for Parrot configuration step class auto::va_ptr
states that its purpo
Patches applied to trunk in r22786. Resolving ticket.
Please review attached patch, which refactors Parrot configuration step
auto::env slightly and provides 3 test files.
Index: MANIFEST
===
--- MANIFEST(revision 22786)
+++ MANIFEST(working copy)
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# ex: set ro:
#
On Friday 09 November 2007 09:00:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: paultcochrane
> Date: Fri Nov 9 08:59:59 2007
> New Revision: 22780
>
> Modified:
>trunk/src/objects.c
>trunk/src/pmc/namespace.pmc
>trunk/src/pmc_freeze.c
>
> Log:
> [core,pmc] Removed unreachable code compiler wa
On Nov 9, 2007, at 8:08 PM, James Keenan (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #47313]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47313 >
The description for Parrot con
On Nov 9, 2007, at 2:24 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote:
On 09/11/2007, Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you test the exec runcore? I don't think any of that code is used
outside of the exec runcore so you aren't actually testing that code.
I'll have a go at testing against the exec runco
