chromatic wrote:
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 19:30:09 James Keenan wrote:
---
t/pmc/exporter.t2 512122 2-3
Failed 1/1 test scripts. 2/12 subtests failed.
Files=1, Tests=12, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.27 cu
Verified on Linux and Darwin that whatever chromatic did fixed this bug.
(The others I reported are still outstanding on both OSes.)
kid51
On 15/10/2007, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
> > On Sun Jul 08 15:09:19 2007, ptc wrote:
> >> At present we have to specify warnings flags for each version of gcc
> >> (see config/auto/gcc.pm). This is a pain. Perl 5 is able to work out
> >> automatically
> 4. Can you answer the question I posed in my July 8 response to your
> original post?
I can't find anything relevant on July the 8th, although there was an
email on Sep the 8th... Is there a ticket number or another pointer
you can give me?
Thanks!
Paul
On Thursday 18 October 2007 08:57:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +ok( !scalar(@multi_dots), 'No multi-dot filenames' )
> + or diag( "Multi-dot filename found in " . scalar @multi_dots
> + . " files:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" );
Both instances of scalar() are redundant here. The bang operator en
Author: paultcochrane
Date: Thu Oct 18 11:58:53 2007
New Revision: 22234
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd09_gc.pod
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd16_native_call.pod
Log:
[docs/pdds] Basic reformat of some paragraphs. This has the positive side
effect of lines not exceeding the 100 character l
Hi all,
there is now a test in t/codingstds called filenames.t which
encapsulates the discussion here. Is this sufficient to now close
this ticket and to remove the old check_source_standards.pl program?
Paul
On 10/18/07, Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there is now a test in t/codingstds called filenames.t which
> encapsulates the discussion here. Is this sufficient to now close
> this ticket and to remove the old check_source_standards.pl program?
>
yes, i believe your solution meets the c
On 10/18/07, Paul Cochrane via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39824
>
> Since the above ticket has now been resolved, does this mean that this
> ticket can also be resolved?
>
yes, i believe we've addressed all the points in this ticket well
enough t
On Oct 18, 1:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jerry Gay) wrote:
> On 10/17/07, via RT Bernhard Schmalhofer
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
> > # Please include the string: [perl #46499]
> > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issu
James,
Thanks for pointing out what you meant. I think I must have been
having a bit of a brain-fade moment or something...
On Sun Jul 08 18:06:03 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Paul Cochrane wrote:
>Perl 5 is able to work out
> > automatically the warnings flags of gcc and then use those
> http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39824
Since the above ticket has now been resolved, does this mean that this
ticket can also be resolved?
Paul
I started to write an OpenGL library and was only a couple of dozen
lines into the pir when I remembered the documentation about callbacks
in docs/pdds/draft/pdd16_native_call.pod .
Currently there are only two signatures supported on callbacks: one
with user_data and extern_data and the other wit
On Thursday 18 October 2007 18:04:15 James Keenan wrote:
> Linux. r22261
>
> [li11-226:parrot] 559 $ prove -v t/pmc/objects.t
> t/pmc/objects1..74
> ok 1 - find_type (base class)
>
> [snip]
>
> not ok 57 - equality of subclassed Integer
>
> # Failed test (t/pmc/objects.t at line 1668)
> #
On Thu Oct 18 19:31:48 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not sure about the current status of t/examples/shootout.t on Linux,
> but it is still failing on Darwin. See attached.
It should be noted that apart from shootout.t, the only failures I'm
getting on Darwin are from the same tests which
See patch diff.fatal.revised.txt attached to RT 44525 tonight for an
implementation of the listing of failed configuration steps.
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #46541]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=46541 >
Linux. r22261
[li11-226:parrot] 559 $ prove -v t/pmc/objects.t
t/pmc/objects1..74
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #46539]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=46539 >
Looks like code starting at line 298 is being interpreted as a C++-
style comment.
[
Resolved in r22217.
I'm not sure about the current status of t/examples/shootout.t on Linux,
but it is still failing on Darwin. See attached.
t/examples/shootout..
# Failed test (t/examples/shootout.t at line 108)
# Exited with error code: [SIGNAL 10]
# Received:
#
# Expected:
# P4
# 200
20 matches
Mail list logo
