On 14/08/07, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not just pull Slurp or File::Slurp into the tree? Yes, writing a
> slurp function is trivial but (bare with me here) if it's non-trivial
> enough to be factored out into a module then it should be non-trivial
> enough to not re-invent the
# New Ticket Created by "Sandy Bultena"
# Please include the string: [perl #44621]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44621 >
OK, I'm game!
- Original Message -
From: "James E Keenan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Paul Cochrane wrote:
On 14/08/07, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not just pull Slurp or File::Slurp into the tree? Yes, writing a
slurp function is trivial but (bare with me here) if it's non-trivial
enough to be factored out into a module then it should be non-trivial
enough to n
On 8/14/07, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Cochrane wrote:
> > On 14/08/07, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Why not just pull Slurp or File::Slurp into the tree? Yes, writing a
> >> slurp function is trivial but (bare with me here) if it's non-trivial
> >> enough to
On 07/08/12 22:11 -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> docs/submissions.pod states:
> "DO NOT paste the content of the new file or files into the body of the
> message."
>
> I.e., send the content as an email attachment.
>
> But whenever I have used the 'parrotbug' utility, I have never seen a way
> to
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, James E Keenan wrote:
>
> > Bob Rogers wrote:
> > >Compiling r20605 last night gave me 69291 occurrences of a warning
> > > about warn_unused_result:
> > >
> > > include/parrot/stacks.h:56: warning: `warn_unused_result' attr
On Aug 14, 2007, at 6:27 PM, Andy Dougherty wrote:
see above. It would have been nice if gcc simply rejected the
attribute
so that testing the exit status of gcc would be sufficient. gcc-3.4
doesn't have this problem. The test could either be made to only work
for gcc > 3.3, or it could tr
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 07:11:36AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
> i started Bundle::Parrot to work towards the goal of removing all
> external modules from the parrot repository. external modules don't
> belong in the repository unless we need to fork them from their CPAN
> version. unfortunately, this
Sandy Bultena wrote:
# New Ticket Created by "Sandy Bultena"
# Please include the string: [perl #44621]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44621 >
OK, I'm game!
Sandy: Check out: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ti
Patch applied to trunk in r20268 Aug 14 2007.
Patch applied to trunk in r20628 Aug 14 2007.
Committed to trunk in r20629.
On 8/14/07, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 07:11:36AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
> > i started Bundle::Parrot to work towards the goal of removing all
> > external modules from the parrot repository. external modules don't
> > belong in the repository unless we nee
13 matches
Mail list logo
