Greetings,
I saw your sentinel patch but didn't apply it yet.
On 7/7/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm tracking down potential memory corruption with my sentinel patch. Here's
something really weird:
$ prove t/op/trans.t
t/op/transNOK 19/22
# Failed test (t/op/trans.t at li
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #43673]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43673 >
in the file lib/Parrot/Configure.pm there is the todo item:
# XXX cc_build uses th
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #43675]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43675 >
In lib/Parrot/Configure.pm there is the todo item:
# XXX This works. but is probab
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Jul 9 13:00:01 2007 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with mo
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #43681]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43681 >
In lib/Parrot/Docs/File.pm is the todo item:
# TODO - This needs more thought. I'm
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #43687]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43687 >
In lib/Parrot/Docs/File.pm there is the todo item:
# TODO - The abstract section a
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #43691]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43691 >
In lib/Parrot/Distribution.pm there is the todo item:
# XXX: lex_source_files() co
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #43683]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43683 >
In lib/Parrot/Docs/File.pm is the todo item:
# Remove any POD.
Resolved in r19716
Thanks to Paul Cochrane, I am now able to run splint on the parrot
sources. I'm using git-svn to sync his "splint" branch up with the
latest changes from trunk, so this is current as of svn r19710.
Summary:
Error TypeReported Suppressed
=== ==
# New Ticket Created by Mark Glines
# Please include the string: [perl #43671]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43671 >
This code doesn't actually get compiled on my system, because linux has
EWOULDBLOCK.
Can
Author: larry
Date: Mon Jul 9 09:29:45 2007
New Revision: 14427
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Log:
Clarify syntax and semantics of double quotes in patterns.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
==
--- do
Paul Cochrane wrote:
in the file lib/Parrot/Configure.pm there is the todo item:
# XXX cc_build uses this verbose setting, why?
$self->data->set( verbose => $verbose ) if $n > 2;
Work out why, add an explanation to this ticket and to the code.
I posed this question to the list on Ap
Mark Glines wrote:
Thanks to Paul Cochrane, I am now able to run splint on the parrot
sources. I'm using git-svn to sync his "splint" branch up with the
latest changes from trunk, so this is current as of svn r19710.
Summary:
Error TypeReported Suppressed
===
Mark Glines wrote:
Thanks to Paul Cochrane, I am now able to run splint on the parrot
sources. I'm using git-svn to sync his "splint" branch up with the
latest changes from trunk, so this is current as of svn r19710.
Summary:
Error TypeReported Suppressed
===
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:17:03 -0400
James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you give us splint noobs a rundown on how to interpret this data?
> Thanks.
Click the link ( http://squawk.glines.org/splint2-try3.log ), look for
warnings that look interesting, and fix them. :)
Mark
On Jul 9, 2007, at 7:16 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
Can you give us splint noobs a rundown on how to interpret this
data? Thanks.
Give us another couple of days to shake out the noise, 'kay?
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Monday 09 July 2007 02:49:03 Nuno 'smash' Carvalho wrote:
> I saw your sentinel patch but didn't apply it yet.
> Is this related to you sentnel patch? I can re-test this after appling it.
Here's a better version. I suspect it's not very portable. It probably needs
to fix up page alignment,
18 matches
Mail list logo
