I hate seeing repeated code structures. We could simplify the mark() entry in
plenty of PMCs with a macro something like:
#define MARK_UNLESS_NULL(interp, struct, name) \
if (struct->name) \
pobject_lives(interp, (PObj *)struct->name)
-- c
On Mon Jun 18 15:03:31 2007, petdance wrote:
>
> On Jun 18, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Mark Glines (via RT) wrote:
>
> > Here's a patch to consolidate that, and standardize on STRING (based
> > on the fact that it's used *much* more often than String is).
>
> And also isn't String a standard C++ class?
On Jun 18, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
Is there a reason we use
memcpy( dest, src, sizeof(FOO) );
instead of
*dest = *src;
The latter should be the exact same code, but be much less likely to
be screwed up.
No, they're extremely different. In the first, the data of FOO is
thats great because i actually use some parts for the article i
currently write about perl6 and i think some
musings about perl6 in theory could in this way flow back to the book
because i think its not written
the easiest way in some corners. but will see. great step
herbert
proton-ce.sf.net
Allison Randal wrote:
> I just signed an agreement with O'Reilly that assigns the full copyright
> in the book "Perl 6 and Parrot Essentials" to The Perl Foundation. The
> text is out-of-date, but can be updated much more rapidly than it can be
> rewritten from scratch.
Sounds great. Does TPF h
I'm pleased to announce that the Perl 6 parts of /Perl 6 and Parrot
Essentials/
are now available at http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/docs/tutorial/ [1]
for your hacking
pleasure.
Thanks to Allison for navigating the sometimes murky waters of
copyright assignment
and licensing to get this docum
On Jun 18, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
Allison Randal wrote:
I just signed an agreement with O'Reilly that assigns the full
copyright
in the book "Perl 6 and Parrot Essentials" to The Perl Foundation.
The
text is out-of-date, but can be updated much more rapidly than it
can be
r
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #43249]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43249 >
To be removed from the 0.4.14 release (deprecation notice given in 0.4.13).
src/pmc
All XXX notes should be attached to an RT ticket.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: petdance
Date: Sun Jun 17 23:21:22 2007
New Revision: 19081
Modified:
trunk/include/parrot/register.h
Log:
add an XXX note
Modified: trunk/include/parrot/register.h
==
Additions and corrections welcome.
--
New in 0.4.13
- Languages:
+ Updated Lisp, Lua, PHP ("Plumhead"), Python ("Pynie"), ABC,
WMLScript, and Tcl ("ParTcl").
+ Perl 6 passes all but one of the sanity tests.
+ PGE supports latest Perl 6 grammar syntax. Perl 6 and ABC parsers
updated to
While putting together the news entries for the 0.4.13 release, I ended
up doing a code review on PMCProxy.
It looks like every low-level PMC is creating a proxy object for itself
and these proxies are stored in the interpreter global parrot_interp_t.
I intended that proxies would only be cre
Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Jun 18, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Mark Glines (via RT) wrote:
|
| > Here's a patch to consolidate that, and standardize on STRING (based
| > on the fact that it's used *much* more often than String is).
|
| And also isn't String a standard C++ class?
No. T
On 19 Jun 2007, at 08:48, Joshua Isom wrote:
On Jun 18, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
Is there a reason we use
memcpy( dest, src, sizeof(FOO) );
instead of
*dest = *src;
The latter should be the exact same code, but be much less likely
to be screwed up.
No, they're extremely
Hi I am sameer and am new to this group. It would realy help if any
body can let me know is there a book or reference guiode where in i
can get help regarding the perl/java interface and also about the tool
named "Java perl lingo".
# New Ticket Created by Ron Blaschke
# Please include the string: [perl #43250]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43250 >
Test 5 of F has some very strong timing constraint.
Two sleeps of a second each (and a
I'm working on the development plan for the next generation of the
Perl6-in-Perl6 compiler "kp6". kp6 is implemented in mp6, a basic
version of Perl 6 which is written in mp6 itself, and bootstrapped
on Perl 5.
kp6, while incomplete, runs today and can already parse and compile
a subset of Perl
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:33:23 -0700
"Paul Cochrane via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Jun 18 15:03:31 2007, petdance wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 18, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Mark Glines (via RT) wrote:
> >
> > > Here's a patch to consolidate that, and standardize on STRING
> > > (based on the fact t
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #43251]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43251 >
According to its documentation, mk_manifests.pl "...generates a set
of F files that gi
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:14:22AM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> Additions and corrections welcome.
>
> --
>
> New in 0.4.13
>
> - Languages:
> + Updated Lisp, Lua, PHP ("Plumhead"), Python ("Pynie"), ABC,
> WMLScript, and Tcl ("ParTcl").
> + Perl 6 passes all but one of the sanity tests
On Jun 19, 2007, at 2:33 AM, Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
Does this close this ticket, or are there still outstanding instances?
No, that closes it. Thanks for taking care of it.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:14:22AM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> Additions and corrections welcome.
>
> --
>
> New in 0.4.13
>
> - Languages:
> + Updated Lisp, Lua, PHP ("Plumhead"), Python ("Pynie"), ABC,
> WMLScript, and Tcl ("ParTcl").
> + Perl 6 passes all but one of the sanity tests
On 6/19/07, via RT Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Ron Blaschke
# Please include the string: [perl #43250]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43250 >
Test 5 of F has some very str
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, chromatic via RT wrote:
> On Monday 18 June 2007 09:54:01 Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry to report it, but this one isn't fixed. For example, consider
> > test t/src_hash_6. If I compile and run it manually, I get
> >
> > $ t/src/hash_6
> > 42
> > Segment
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:14:22AM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
Additions and corrections welcome.
--
New in 0.4.13
- Languages:
+ Updated Lisp, Lua, PHP ("Plumhead"), Python ("Pynie"), ABC,
WMLScript, and Tcl ("ParTcl").
I don't think tcl has any significant updates in this release
[ Sorry to fall off the net for several days . . .]
On 6/13/07, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:08:34PM -0400, Charles Bailey wrote:
: I'm concerned that the relevant precedent isn't just Perl5. The ?: spelling
: of the ternary is pretty deeply embedded in progr
James Keenan (via RT) schrieb:
According to its documentation, mk_manifests.pl "...generates a set
of F files that give the final
locations in the file system for all the installable files listed in
F and F."
The name of this program is close to that of tools/dev/
mk_manifest_and_skip.pl --
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 11:50:35AM -0400, Charles Bailey wrote:
: Yep. For that matter, if I had to pick one change in this area that'd
: have maximum impact, I'd say a good assign-if-uninitialized idiom
: would be way ahead of an if-then-else idiom.
Depending on how you mean "uninitialized", tha
I'm quite surprised by this debate... To me it seems a clear rule that
state that "if a line begin with "=" then it starts a POD section" is
way easier to understand than "a line beginning by = will start a POD
section except if it is in a Perl statement, or in a :to section, or
in a string litera
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 08:07:26 Will Coleda wrote:
> I don't think tcl has any significant updates in this release.
It fails more tests faster. That's significant, though not brag-worthy.
-- c
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
perl6 is now passing all of the 01-sanity tests.
Rockin'! A lot of commits went into that this month. Thanks guys!
Allison
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #43253]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43253 >
for some time now, parrot has been segfaulting on windows. this is a
notoriously tricky bug
applied workaround patch as r19136.
~jerry
On Jun 19, 2007, at 12:13 AM, chromatic wrote:
I hate seeing repeated code structures. We could simplify the mark
() entry in
plenty of PMCs with a macro something like:
#define MARK_UNLESS_NULL(interp, struct, name) \
if (struct->name) \
pobject_lives(interp, (PObj *)struct->name
As mentioned during today's #parrotsketch meeting, I have
a number of questions about the specifics of performing
certain operations in the new object model given by pdd15.
These are all generally "how do I...?" types of questions,
where I have something I want to do but in reading pdd15
it wasn't
Am Montag, 18. Juni 2007 23:48 schrieb Andy Lester:
> Is there a reason we use
>
> memcpy( dest, src, sizeof(FOO) );
>
> instead of
>
> *dest = *src;
>
> The latter should be the exact same code, but be much less likely to
> be screwed up.
I'm using a lot of the first kind. The main reason
Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 16:52 schrieb Patrick R. Michaud:
> perl6 is now passing all of the 01-sanity tests.
Woot.
Wouldn't that qualify for a 0.5.0 release number.
leo
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 16:52 schrieb Patrick R. Michaud:
perl6 is now passing all of the 01-sanity tests.
Woot.
Wouldn't that qualify for a 0.5.0 release number.
Not yet, but when we have PGE and Perl 6 switched over to the new object
model it will. (i.e. we may
On Jun 19, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:14:22AM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
Additions and corrections welcome.
--
New in 0.4.13
- Languages:
+ Updated Lisp, Lua, PHP ("Plumhead"), Python ("Pynie"), ABC,
WMLScript, and Tcl ("ParTcl").
+ Perl
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #43254]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43254 >
This ticket is a placeholder for the 0.4.14 release on 17 July 2007.
Release cut and tagged. You may now return to commits as usual.
Allison
On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 0.4.13
"Clifton." Parrot (http://parrotcode.org/) is a virtual machine aimed
at running all dynamic languages.
Parrot 0.4.13 can be obtained via CPAN (soon), or follow the
download instructions at http://parrotcode.org/source.html.
Parro
On Tue Jun 19 09:19:38 2007, bernhard wrote:
>
> Perhaps somebody who knows about creating Parrot distributions can comment
> whether 'tools/dev/mk_manifests.pl' and 'tools/dev/installfiles.pl' are
> needed at all.
>
Well, pending an answer to that question, I decided to take bull by horns and
Name change applied. Closing ticket.
As many of you may have gleaned from some of the recent Parrot
announcements, we now have the Perl6/Parrot compiler ("perl6")
passing all of the "01-sanity" tests. Special thanks go to
Will Coleda (Coke), chromatic, Jerry Gay (particle), Mark
Glines, and anyone else I might have forgotten for t
Hi everyone,
I am working with perl 5.8 at the moment after developping web apps in PHP.
I know that perl doesn't only focus on web apps and my question might
seem irrelevant
but I've been searching the web in order to find the new features of
perl6 regarding
new functions, core module lists
On 6/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi I am sameer and am new to this group. It would realy help if any
body can let me know is there a book or reference guiode where in i
can get help regarding the perl/java interface and also about the tool
named "Java perl lingo".
For
Here's the first draft (documented in Pod 6, of course ;-).
Feedback and suggestions are most welcome.
(But please don't bother explaining to me this feature won't suffice
as the high-level automatic code-to-documentation mechanism that Markov
has been championing. I promise that I'm very well
Ambient aliases
The A<> formatting code specifies an alias to an
ambient antecedent.
This is li
Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
- Misc:
+ Updated Parrot distribution to Artistic License 2.0, from dual
Artistic 1/GPL license.
Does this mean that Parrot is no longer dual licensed?
Yes. Under section 4(c)(ii) of Artistic 2.0 you can redistribute the
code under the GPL (any v
49 matches
Mail list logo
