If you're using a modern GNU ld, remove the shared library and add a few more
flags to LINK_DYNAMIC in Makefile. Here's mine:
LINK_DYNAMIC =
-Wl,-E,-O1,-zdynsort,-hashvals,--hash-style=gnu,-zcombreloc
These options seem to speed up the test suite for me by 10 - 15%. I'm curious
to s
On 6/3/07, Jonathan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chas Owens wrote:
> Jonathan Lang wrote:
> > Is there any reason why we can't simply define '$a x $n' as being
> > shorthand for 'cat($a xx $n)'? In what way does the former differ
> > from the latter, other than the use of a Whatever in place
Chas Owens wrote:
Jonathan Lang wrote:
> Chas Owens wrote:
> > Jonathan Lang wrote:
> > > Is there any reason why we can't simply define '$a x $n' as being
> > > shorthand for 'cat($a xx $n)'? In what way does the former differ
> > > from the latter, other than the use of a Whatever in place of
On 6/3/07, Jonathan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chas Owens wrote:
> Jonathan Lang wrote:
> > Chas Owens wrote:
> > > Jonathan Lang wrote:
> > > > Is there any reason why we can't simply define '$a x $n' as being
> > > > shorthand for 'cat($a xx $n)'? In what way does the former differ
> > >
On Jun 2, 2007, at 10:32 AM, Bob Rogers via RT wrote:
This seems like a lot of trouble just to keep dead code in the
codebase.
Is there some reason not to yank the useless methods?
-- Bob
Not that *I* know of. But my knowledge base only ext
chromatic wrote:
If you're using a modern GNU ld, remove the shared library and add a few more
flags to LINK_DYNAMIC in Makefile. Here's mine:
LINK_DYNAMIC =
-Wl,-E,-O1,-zdynsort,-hashvals,--hash-style=gnu,-zcombreloc
Do you have to edit the Makefile for this, or can you set it wi
On 02/06/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 13:48:04 Paul Cochrane wrote:
> I recently added a test for TODO items in the pod source, but added it
> to the t/doc/ test suite. It is more of a coding standards test
> anyway, and I was wondering if it would be ok if I
Hi,
At the moment, under Win32, virtually all of the Perl 6 test suite fails
unless run with -G (disabling garbage collection). The problem for at
least one of them is that the free list appears to be corrupted.
First, a few notes on the free list. Parrot allocates large chunks of
memory, ca
Chas Owens wrote:
I am almost certain that the following code is in list context.
pugs> my @a = '-' x 5, 'foo', '-' x 5;
pugs> @a
("-", "foo", "-")
pugs> my @b = cat('-' xx 5), 'foo', cat('-' xx 5)
("-", "-", "-", "-", "-", "foo", "-", "-", "-", "-", "-")
However, it does seem that Pug'
Is "item context" what we're calling scalar these days, or something else?
On 6/3/07, Jonathan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chas Owens wrote:
> I am almost certain that the following code is in list context.
>
> pugs> my @a = '-' x 5, 'foo', '-' x 5;
> pugs> @a
> ("-", "foo", "-")
> p
On Sunday 03 June 2007 05:39:01 James E Keenan wrote:
> chromatic wrote:
> > If you're using a modern GNU ld, remove the shared library and add a few
> > more flags to LINK_DYNAMIC in Makefile. Here's mine:
> >
> > LINK_DYNAMIC =
> > -Wl,-E,-O1,-zdynsort,-hashvals,--hash-style=gnu,-zcombrel
Mark J. Reed wrote:
Is "item context" what we're calling scalar these days, or something else?
According to S03, it does indeed appear that "item context" is the
current terminology for what perl 5 called "scalar context":
The item contextualizer
item foo()
The new name for Perl 5's s
On 6/3/07, Jonathan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
From what you're saying, I get the impression that you think that "'-'
x 5" ought to produce a single string of five dashes regardless of
whether the context is item or list. Correct? (Note: I'm not asking
about what the spec says, since
Author: paultcochrane
Date: Sun Jun 3 07:38:04 2007
New Revision: 18781
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd00_pdd.pod
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd07_codingstd.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/docs/debug.pod
trunk/docs/gettingstarted.pod
Log:
[docs] References to de
> I grepped for other files that can make use of mem_sys_*_zeroed
> variants. I attached a patch that affects objects.c, vtables.c,
> gc/register.c and stm/waitlist.c.
I have looked at the 'more_memory.patch' and I'm wondering about the
portability.
In that patch loops where pointers are explicit
Hi Everyone,
I am not sure if this is the correct list to post this problem to
but I will try here first. I am having a problem with understanding
TGE and I was hoping someone might be able to give me some help. I am
writing a parrot version of 1964 BASIC using the compiler tools and I
have t
Chas Owens wrote:
The current Perl 5 behavior is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ perl -le 'my @a = ("-" x 5, "foo", "-" x 5); print "@a"'
- foo -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ perl -le 'my @a = (("-") x 5, "foo", ("-") x 5); print
"@a"'
- - - - - foo - - - - -
I am against anything other than that for x o
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 08:00:18AM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
> I have looked at the 'more_memory.patch' and I'm wondering about the
> portability.
> In that patch loops where pointers are explicitly set to NULL
> are replaced with a
> memset( start, 0, len);
>
> What happens w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> @@ -562,10 +625,10 @@
> @list xx $count
>
> Evaluates the left argument in list context, replicates the resulting
> -Capture value the number of time specified by the right argument and
> +C value the number of time specified by the right argument and
Presumably
Author: larry
Date: Sun Jun 3 17:23:15 2007
New Revision: 14415
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
typo from Aaron Crane++
s/cat/list/ for flattening captures in order
cat() now only produces pseudo-strings even in list
Can anyone point out what I'm doing wrong, please?
I'm seeing (first part if output from parsing, which is OK, second part is
failure to apply rewrite rule):
"VAR1" => PMC 'PGE::Match' => "myfun" @ 0 {
=> PMC 'PGE::Match' => "m" @ 0
}
transforming
Cannot find the attribute 'functio
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:49:02 Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007 15:26 schrieb Andy Dougherty:
> > /*
> > * These constants correspond to the debugger commands and are
> > * used in src/debug.c. To map command strings to their
> > * numeric values, use the algorithm from par
On Thursday 19 April 2007 19:45:29 Ryan Hinton wrote:
> Here is my machine info:
> FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE i386
>
> Here is the complete report.
Thanks for the report. How does a current checkout fare?
Joshua Gatcomb, I believe, is also seeing dynamic loading failures on FreeBSD.
Perhaps there are
You have to add LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.:blib/lib to your environment as in
src/dynoplibs/README(not the best place, but it's where I first found
it) to get it to work at the moment. I don't recall there always
having been an issue but it exists at the moment.
It should be noted probably that darwin
On Saturday 28 April 2007 16:43:06 Mehmet Yavuz Selim Soyturk wrote:
> Next program makes a slurpy tailcall, and it causes a memory leak for me.
Confirmed. Interestingly, the problem looks like a Key PMC somewhere gets
garbage collected inappropriately.
I tried various tricks to mark the call_
On Sunday 21 January 2007 23:56:09 Allison Randal wrote:
> When generating a stub PMC with F, the generated
> stub terminates the compile process the first time miniparrot is run.
> This is because the freshly generated stub overrides the C
> method to return a null PMC.
I can't reproduce this no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: larry
Date: Sun Jun 3 17:23:15 2007
New Revision: 14415
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
typo from Aaron Crane++
s/cat/list/ for flattening captures in order
cat() now only produces p
Am Montag, 4. Juni 2007 03:40 schrieb chromatic:
> > > #define c_b 25245
> >
> > Another WTF from code history.
> >
> > leo - please remove this - kthx.
>
> We have to replace it with something; any ideas?
Well, just the "normal" way of parsing commands. Chained ifs:
if (!memcmp(cmd
28 matches
Mail list logo
