On 6/2/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 01 June 2007 16:29:08 Mehmet Yavuz Selim Soyturk wrote:
> After a suggestion of Bernhard at #parrot, I added a function named
> C to parrot:
>
> void * mem__sys_realloc_zeroed(void *from, size_t size, size_t
> old_size)
>
> It zeroes t
Nicholas Clark wrote:
Works for me! :-)
A note: as possibly the stumbler-upon-this-issue; chromatic's patch made
things work here, right through make smoke.
Thanks.
a
--
Andy Bach, Sys. Mangler
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VOICE: (608) 261-5738 FAX 264-5932
"Capital is only the fruit o
Test now passes on Darwin and Linux. Resolving ticket.
On Fri Jun 01 19:46:40 2007, rgrjr wrote:
> This is from the "Small tweak to Pmc2c.pm" I posted on 19-May and
> committed as r18646 on 26-May. Note that lib/Parrot/Pmc2c.pm is not
> actually doing anything different now, it's just telling you that none
> of the code for these methods is being used
On 6/2/07, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From my wiki at http://xoa.petdance.com/Use_const_proactively
Const your local variables
The following is adapted from C++ Coding Standards by Herb Sutter and
Andrei Alexandrescu (with some C++-specific stuff removed):
const is your fri
From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:12:41 -0700
On Fri Jun 01 19:46:40 2007, rgrjr wrote:
> This is from the "Small tweak to Pmc2c.pm" I posted on 19-May and
> committed as r18646 on 26-May. Note that lib/Parrot/Pmc2c.pm is not
> actually do
On Thursday 31 May 2007 13:48:04 Paul Cochrane wrote:
> I recently added a test for TODO items in the pod source, but added it
> to the t/doc/ test suite. It is more of a coding standards test
> anyway, and I was wondering if it would be ok if I moved it from the
> doc tests into the coding stand
Author: larry
Date: Sat Jun 2 12:42:11 2007
New Revision: 14413
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S13.pod
Log:
Dropped : from all listop
Author: larry
Date: Sat Jun 2 14:45:43 2007
New Revision: 14414
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
First installment of filling out descriptions of operator semantics.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
===
Is there any reason why we can't simply define '$a x $n' as being
shorthand for 'cat($a xx $n)'? In what way does the former differ
from the latter, other than the use of a Whatever in place of $n?
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
I started hacking this because I thought I needed it, but that turned
out not to be true. Should I finish it (it still needs tests), or is
there some reason to hold off?
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
On Saturday 02 June 2007 13:44:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> First version of the headerizer works successfully on
> include/parrot/string_funcs.h
This checkin broke at least one test. I know accidents happen, but you've had
at least three checkins that have broken the compile or the tests in t
The attached patch amends the I-reg shift operators so that they
produce results that are consistent with PMC shifts, which produce the
exact value [1]. Shifting left or right by at least the word size
always produces zero, and negative shift values are taken to mean "shift
in the other directi
On 6/2/07, Jonathan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any reason why we can't simply define '$a x $n' as being
shorthand for 'cat($a xx $n)'? In what way does the former differ
from the latter, other than the use of a Whatever in place of $n?
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
"$a x $n" is
Chas Owens wrote:
Jonathan Lang wrote:
> Is there any reason why we can't simply define '$a x $n' as being
> shorthand for 'cat($a xx $n)'? In what way does the former differ
> from the latter, other than the use of a Whatever in place of $n?
"$a x $n" is equivalent to "join '', $a xx $n", but
15 matches
Mail list logo
