I never could find the Pod-to-XHTML'd version of S26 -- the document
attached to that email was S26.pod6, not S26.xhtml.
I don't want to bug Damian, because obviously he has enough of life
"happening", as it were. But is the XHTML'd version of S26 available
anywhere? I haven't been able to fin
On 19/03/07, via RT Jerry Gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #41915]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41915 >
tools/dev/ has a number of unused
# New Ticket Created by Mike Mattie
# Please include the string: [perl #41918]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41918 >
Here are the spelling fixes caught by jerry gay. thanks for the heads up.
based against
> On Monday 19 March 2007 11:56, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > The only way to tell for sure if you have a working compiler is to try to
> > compile and run something. After the user has been prompted for all the
> > flags, simply try to compile and run a simple test program. If it works,
> > fine
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, chromatic wrote:
> On Monday 19 March 2007 12:22, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > I found the ticket that introduced this failing behavior, so I'm resending
> > my message below with a fixed-up subject line to enter into RT. In brief,
> > this patch incorrectly assumes that all
On Tue Mar 20 12:13:15 2007, coke wrote:
> per chromatic, this should probably be backed out. At least for the
> 0.4.10 release.
Backed out until we find another solution to the problem.
Paul
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #41926]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41926 >
attached inline is a partial update of NEWS for the 0.4.10 release.
i'm too hungry and tire
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 12:25, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, chromatic wrote:
> > I realize this patch precludes cross-compilation at the moment, but does
> > it work better for you, Andy?
>
> Alas, no. Here's what I get (again with --verbose=2). I don't know why
> it's report
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #41927]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41927 >
This patch is a collaborative effort by firstly Coke, myself and then
particle on #parr
Actually bothering to attach the patch this time...
parrot_distro.patch
Description: Binary data
Reverted order of Configure.pl steps, just for you. =-)
On Fri Mar 16 19:24:55 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Results confirmed again at r17522 tonight.
... At least as far as PAUSE. Web site updated. Once it hits CPAN,
I'll push the rest of the announcements out.
Thanks to everyone who submitted patches or ideas, for their help in
getting this out the door.
Code slush is over, spring is here, commit away.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
[EMAIL PROTE
12 matches
Mail list logo
