Re: perl6-synopsis svn

On 2/23/07, Blair Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry if this is a silly question but I haven't been able to find the answer. Is the perl6-synopsis SVN repository publicly available or is it in the same repository as that of Parrot or Pugs? I think you're looking for this: http://svn.per

[PATCH] PDD16 NCI update with simple example

hi, I've been playing with NCI calls and more fun (embedding a Parrot, that runs a PIR program, which invokes a C function, that then invokes a PIR callback function). As a result, I added a simple example to PDD16. I didnt' put too much work in it (there are many more places that could be i

Re: [svn:parrot] r17107 - trunk/src/stm

On 2/22/07, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 'mark_extracted' should have the guard added. The same one should work. As intended, it is marking all the read_records and write_records. There just happen to be none to mark. added in r17159, thanks. ~jerry

Re: Porting parrot on PDA

On 2/8/07, Hakim Cassimally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm keen to port to maemo (Nokia N800) - I'm guessing this will be easier as it's based on debian linux and uses scratchbox for cross compilation, but I believe it doesn't built out of the box. I'd like to join the porting effort if there's

Re: Cross-compiling Parrot

Allison Randal ha scritto: We do. Unfortunately we can't rely on Perl 5 for the configure system. It may seem like an easy way to gain cross-compilation in the short term, but in the long term it will hurt us. Miniparrot is the right way to go. It certainly needs work, though. As you're think

Weekly Perl 6 mailing list summary for 21-28 January, 2007

This week on the Perl 6 mailing lists "Take the longest token, lie down and if the unease persists, write some code..." -- Brad Bowman, in 'DFA/NFA context is non-local ' perl6-language RAII in Perl6/Parrot Previously on this threa

Re: [svn:parrot] r17107 - trunk/src/stm

On Thursday 22 February 2007 00:28, you wrote: > chromatic wrote: > >> +if (saved_log_data == NULL) > >> +return; > >> + > >> saved = saved_log_data; > >> mem_sys_free(saved->reads); > >> mem_sys_free(saved->writes); > > I'm not sure this is the right fix; there's litt

[S09] "Whatever" indices and shaped arrays

From S09: "When you use * with + and -, it creates a value of Whatever but Num, which the array subscript interpreter will interpret as the subscript one off the end of that dimension of the array." "Alternately, *+0 is the first element, and the subscript dwims from the front or back depending

[perl #40626] [BUG] :vtable fails for subclasses of core classes

this bug seems to be resolved as of r17163. however, i'm not closing this ticket until the example code in the original post is added as a test. ~jerry

[PATCH] languages/PIR update pirgrammar.pod

hi, attached an update for languages/PIR/docs/pirgrammar.pod fixing: 0.1.3 * Updated short sub invocation for NCI invocations. * Added an example for |.globalconst|. * Added some remarks at section for Macros. * Added some remarks here and there, and fixe

[svn:parrot-pdd] r17164 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

Author: chromatic Date: Fri Feb 23 12:45:02 2007 New Revision: 17164 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd16_native_call.pod Log: [PDD] Added an NCI invocation example (Klaas-Jan Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd16_native_call.pod ===

Re: [PATCH] PDD16 NCI update with simple example

On Friday 23 February 2007 05:16, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: > As a result, I added a simple example to PDD16. I didnt' put too much > work in it (there are many more places that could be improved), because > I didn't know if updating this doc is desirable at this moment (any big > changes pending?).

Re: [PATCH] languages/PIR update pirgrammar.pod

On Friday 23 February 2007 11:28, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: > attached an update for languages/PIR/docs/pirgrammar.pod > The document languages/PIR/docs/pirgrammar.html should be removed from > the repository -- don't know how to do this. Then later, we can > generated it via the make file. Patch app

[perl #41600] [BUG] PMC docs are missing from parrotcode.org

# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay # Please include the string: [perl #41600] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41600 > http://parrotcode.org/docs/pmc/ seems to be missing the documents from src/pmc/*.pmc -- it

Re: [perl #40626] [BUG] :vtable fails for subclasses of core classes

On 2/23/07, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri Feb 23 11:16:01 2007, particle wrote: > this bug seems to be resolved as of r17163. however, i'm not closing > this ticket until the example code in the original post is added as a test. > ~jerry Attached a patch adding a test t

Re: [S09] "Whatever" indices and shaped arrays

On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:49:34AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote: : That said, I think I can do one better: : : Ditch all of the above. Instead, '*' always acts like a list of all : valid indices when used in the context of postcircumfix:<[ ]>. Ooh, shiny! Or at least, shiny on the shiny side...

Re: [S09] "Whatever" indices and shaped arrays

Larry Wall wrote: On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:49:34AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote: : That said, I think I can do one better: : : Ditch all of the above. Instead, '*' always acts like a list of all : valid indices when used in the context of postcircumfix:<[ ]>. Ooh, shiny! Or at least, shiny on

[PATCH] Update DEPRECATED.pod

hi, attached a patch updating DEPRECATED.pod. it adds the deprecated ops from http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/ops/var.html (ops: store_global and friends) regards, kjs Index: DEPRECATED.pod === --- DEPRECATED.pod (revision 17165) ++

[perl #41455] [NEW] and [PATCH]: tools/build/ops2pm.pl refactored

Following discussion with particle on Feb 19 2007, these patches and new files were committed to trunk in r17061. Ticket may be closed.

Re: [S09] "Whatever" indices and shaped arrays

On 2/23/07, Jonathan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: '> I'm still debating the boolean context myself. I _think_ it will work; but I have a tendency to miss intricacies. You might instead want to require someone to explicitly check for definedness or existence instead of merely truth; or you mi

[perl #41607] t/compilers/pge/p5regex/dummy.t failure

# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #41607] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41607 > Tonight while running 'make test' I got errors in 1 test file. Here is the output of

Re: [perl #41607] t/compilers/pge/p5regex/dummy.t failure

On 2/23/07, via RT James Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #41607] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41607 > Tonight while running 'make t