Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 2 01:07:36 2007
New Revision: 13564
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
Also allow colon pair syntax for a methodlike kind of filetest.
A bit of junctional cleanup.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
===
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 2 01:22:38 2007
New Revision: 13565
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
More thinking about .:mumble{...}
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.po
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 2 01:28:24 2007
New Revision: 13566
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
Random cleanup.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod(original
hi,
IIRC, IMCC started as a kind of pre-processor for PASM, in other words,
it allowed more readable shortcuts for several constructs. Eventually,
everything was translated to pure PASM, that is, 1 long list of real
Parrot instructions (no .sub/.end blocks etc).
At some point, IMCC was merge
attached a patch that makes ./parrot --version respond copyright
2001-2007, instead of 2001-2006.
regards,
kjs
Index: compilers/imcc/main.c
===
--- compilers/imcc/main.c (revision 16864)
+++ compilers/imcc/main.c (working copy)
@@ -
hi,
attached are 2 files: a script that checks all files for the Last
Changed Date according to SVN, and updates the file if its year >
copyright notice in the file. I'm not very good with Perl, so it might
be badly programmed... However, it only needs running once.
The 2nd file is a test, a
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:01:13PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +by C and the value matchis represented by C. (C,
"matchis" must be a typo :-)
Nicholas Clark
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 2 09:07:05 2007
New Revision: 13567
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Log:
Nick++ noticed where I spaced out. Just glad someone's reading these things...
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +++ doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod Fri Feb 2 01:07:36 2007
> +Both of these forms actually translate to
> +
> +if $filename.TEST(:e) { say "exists" }
> +
> +which which is a generic mechanism that dispatches to the object's
> +class to find the definition of C. (It
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 2 11:14:34 2007
New Revision: 13568
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
typo <== thom++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod(original
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> Just glad someone's reading these things...
Of course we are. But it is hard to react when the syntax isn't in your
muscle memory yet.
>From r13565:
> +%hash.:exists{$key}
I would expect
%hash.exists{$key}
with the shortcut
%hash.:{$key}
to test (at ru
On Friday 02 February 2007 07:45, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
> attached are 2 files: a script that checks all files for the Last
> Changed Date according to SVN, and updates the file if its year
> copyright notice in the file. I'm not very good with Perl, so it might
> be badly programmed... However, i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> +++ doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod Fri Feb 2 01:07:36 2007
>
> if $filename ~~ :e { say "exists" }
> +if $filename.:e { say "exists" }
>
> +Both of these forms actually translate to
> +
> +if $filename.TEST(:e) { say "exists" }
Hey, that looks good
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:06:56PM +, Smylers wrote:
: I've got a slight concern over the name C though. The Perl QA
: folk already seem to have enough trouble coming up with enough
: permutations of "test", "tests", "Test", "TEST", and so on for labelling
: tests, test frameworks, and things
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:14:53PM +0100, Dr.Ruud wrote:
: I would expect
:
: %hash.exists{$key}
:
Except $foo.bar{$key} is interpreted as $foo.bar().{$key}. Things like
"exists" and "delete" need to evaluate the key before calling the method
in question, not after.
: with the shortcut
:
:
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #41425]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41425 >
Refactoring of code in lib/Parrot/Pmc2c/Utils.pm can and should be
tested with the tes
chromatic wrote:
Hi there,
I see one failure with the buildtools tests, run right after make realclean
and a fresh Configure.
t/tools/pmc2cutils/04-dump_pmc...ok 103/119
# Failed test (t/tools/pmc2cutils/04-dump_pmc.t at line 533)
t/tools/pmc2cutils/04-d
Author: allison
Date: Fri Feb 2 21:25:56 2007
New Revision: 16879
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd22_io.pod
Log:
[pdd]: Add status object return value to .open and .close I/O methods.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd22_io.pod
===
18 matches
Mail list logo
