# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #41310]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41310 >
When generating a stub PMC with F, the generated
stub terminates the compile process
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Jan 22 14:00:08 2007 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with m
Here is a script in Perl 5 with a multi-threaded RAII idiom I use quite
a lot (In P5 & C++). I am not sure how threads will be implemented in P6
(but hopefully one will have a *choice* of copying all variables into
your private namespace!).Will the LEAVE closure trait take the previous
role of
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #41312]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41312 >
The FAQ has the following issues:
1) refers to parrot assembly instead of PIR as primar
Actually this script displays: -
Creating 'zippy' with 3 lives
Destroying 'zippy' with 3 lives
Creating 'biggles' with 5 lives
Destroying 'biggles' with 5 lives
T1: starting
T1: 'biggles' has 5 lives
T1: Remove from list
T2: starting
T2: 'biggles' has 4 lives
T2: Remove from list
T3: starting
T3:
Sorry some zealous re-factoring screwed my earlier script. The objects
should have been created outside the push stack. I.e.
my $a = MyObj->new('zippy', 3);
my $b = MyObj->new('biggles', 5);
my $s = new Thread::Semaphore;
my @B :shared;
push @B, $a;
push @B, $b;
...
Then the destruction does
Author: larry
Date: Mon Jan 22 10:46:25 2007
New Revision: 13531
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
Implicit return policies clarified. Loop and conditional returns are now
more conducive to list comprehension constructs (including accidental ones).
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S
Author: larry
Date: Mon Jan 22 11:40:24 2007
New Revision: 13532
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
More list comprehension tweakage.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.po
Author: larry
Date: Mon Jan 22 11:47:39 2007
New Revision: 13533
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
typo from TreyHarris++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod(o
Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
chromatic wrote:
> On Saturday 20 January 2007 10:36, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>> I can't help the feeling that Parrot is a nice linux x86 experiment.
>> Of course one can make the claim that not fixing the problems is my
>> problem.
>
> I so do; wa
Author: particle
Date: Mon Jan 22 11:29:00 2007
New Revision: 16761
Added:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/
- copied from r16760, /trunk/docs/pdds/clip/
Removed:
trunk/docs/pdds/clip/
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/README
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd24_events.pod
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd25_con
Author: larry
Date: Mon Jan 22 12:21:27 2007
New Revision: 13534
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Tweakage of && and || semantics in support of list comprehensions.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
=
'clip' has now been renamed to 'draft', and all references have been
updated (r16761.) coke++ for updating the website.
~jerry
On Mon Jan 22 10:17:48 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri Jan 19 01:48:36 2007, ptc wrote:
> > Which revision of Parrot was this using? The reason I ask is that
> > these files are supposed to be exempt from the coding standards
tests
> > as they are automatically generated by flex/yacc. I
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #41316]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41316 >
Milestone ticket for the 0.4.9 release.
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #41317]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41317 >
attached inline is a patch for a document classifying parrot component
and interface stabil
Author: larry
Date: Mon Jan 22 15:51:04 2007
New Revision: 13535
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
typo from thom++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod(origina
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:48:41PM -0500, Matt Diephouse wrote:
> Alternatively, if you (or anyone else) wanted and were able to provide
> developer access to a Tru64 box, existing committers could try to fix the
> problems. And yes, I would be willing to take a shot at it (realizing that I
> may
At 10:03 AM -0800 1/17/07, Jonathan Lang wrote:
TSa wrote:
Luke Palmer wrote:
That is, is 1 different from 1.0?
I opt for 1 being Int and 1.0 being Num. But for the
latter a test .does(Int) might succeed on the footing
that the fractional part is zero, that is 1.0%1 == 0.
I'm very leery of
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:48:41PM -0500, Matt Diephouse wrote:
>
>> Alternatively, if you (or anyone else) wanted and were able to provide
>> developer access to a Tru64 box, existing committers could try to fix the
>> problems. And yes, I would be willing to take a shot a
Darren Duncan writes:
> For round-trip consistency, a generic non-formatted num-to-char-string
> operation should include a .0 as appropriate if it is converting from
> a Num, whereas when converting from an Int it would not.
So this (in Perl 5):
% perl -wle 'print 100 / 2'
50
you would wan
Author: larry
Date: Mon Jan 22 17:46:46 2007
New Revision: 13536
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Debrainoization suggested by John Macdonald++.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/desi
Author: larry
Date: Mon Jan 22 17:53:44 2007
New Revision: 13537
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
Forgot that we're calling them multislices these days...
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
==
--- doc/
At 00:32 + 1/23/07, Smylers wrote:
> % perl -wle 'print 99 / 2'
> 49.5
I would expect the line to return 49 because you surely meant integer division.
Perl 5 just doesn't have a user-available type integer.
% perl -wle 'print 99.0 / 2.0' OR
% perl -wle 'print 99.0 / 2'
would return 49.5
At 12:32 AM + 1/23/07, Smylers wrote:
Darren Duncan writes:
For round-trip consistency, a generic non-formatted num-to-char-string
operation should include a .0 as appropriate if it is converting from
a Num, whereas when converting from an Int it would not.
So this (in Perl 5):
% pe
Doug McNutt wrote:
At 00:32 + 1/23/07, Smylers wrote:
% perl -wle 'print 99 / 2'
49.5
I would expect the line to return 49 because you surely meant integer
> division. Perl 5 just doesn't have a user-available type integer.
I'd find that somewhat unhelpful. Especially on a one-liner, l
The default / operator is not going to do integer division. This is
not negotiable; normal people expect 1/2 to mean one half, so / is
going to coerce to some type that can support fractions. We'll use
"div" and "mod" for the polymorphic variants defaulting to floor
semantics, and things like edi
At 5:56 PM -0800 1/22/07, Larry Wall wrote:
Whether a Num that happens to be an integer prints out with .0 is a
separate issue. My bias is that a Num pretend to be an integer when
it can. I think most folks (including mathematicians) think that
the integer 1 and the distance from 0 to 1 on the
Larry Wall writes:
> The default / operator is not going to do integer division.
Yay!
> This is not negotiable;
Double-yay!
> Whether a Num that happens to be an integer prints out with .0 is a
> separate issue. My bias is that a Num pretend to be an integer when
> it can.
Triple-yay!
Smyle
Jerry Gay (via RT) wrote:
i'll make any agreed upon changes based on your comments, and if
accepted, commit shortly thereafter.
I give it a thumbs up.
Allison
30 matches
Mail list logo
