On Tue Jan 16 12:05:17 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Attached patch adds new syntax documentation to docs/imcc/syntax.pod and
> fixes some typos there. It now also indicates where various flags are
> explained.
Applied in r16678.
> Is the shorthand syntax for function calls ("($P0, a :slurpy)
Matt Diephouse wrote:
I actually prefer the dot. I don't like the possible ambiguity between
types and local variables:
.local string MyClass
MyClass = '...'
$P0 = new MyClass # is this a type or a string?
At that point, what we're really talking about is sigils. So, why put
sigils o
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:33:52AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> The Perl 6 perspective on this is that error values should be allowed to
> be as "interesting" as you like. The lower level routine goes ahead and
> pregenerates the exception object but returns it as an interesting
> error value inste
Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2007 02:07 schrieb jerry gay:
> i never officially closed the repo to commits, but for those of you
> awaiting parrot's release, it's now complete. you may commit freely.
> thanks for your patience.
Congrats. Well done.
> ~jerry
Thanks
leo
HaloO,
Luke Palmer wrote:
That is, is 1 different from 1.0?
I opt for 1 being Int and 1.0 being Num. But for the
latter a test .does(Int) might succeed on the footing
that the fractional part is zero, that is 1.0%1 == 0.
Note that 1/3*3 does not necessarily equal 1.0 for
floating point math. I
Author: larry
Date: Wed Jan 17 10:56:32 2007
New Revision: 13526
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S13.pod
Log:
Replaced "is commutative" with a more general multisig syntax.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S13.pod
==
--
TSa wrote:
Luke Palmer wrote:
> That is, is 1 different from 1.0?
I opt for 1 being Int and 1.0 being Num. But for the
latter a test .does(Int) might succeed on the footing
that the fractional part is zero, that is 1.0%1 == 0.
I'm very leery of the idea that "A.does(B)" ever returns true when
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 01:41:30PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Luke Palmer wrote:
: >Seems reasonable. My generality alarm goes off when I realize that
: >you can't specify commutativity for two of the three args, but that's
: >fine because it's definitely a cpanable feature.
:
: IIRC, it's pos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+Conjectural: If the first parameter to a multi signature is followed
+by an invocant colon, that signature represents two signatures, one
+for an ordinary method definition, and one for the corresponding multi
+definition that has a comma instead of the colon. This form
Author: larry
Date: Wed Jan 17 11:50:09 2007
New Revision: 13527
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Revised reduce semantics to allow list infixes to work correctly.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
Author: larry
Date: Wed Jan 17 14:05:20 2007
New Revision: 13528
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Log:
Clarify how C<||> limits longest-token semantics.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/d
Author: larry
Date: Wed Jan 17 18:24:48 2007
New Revision: 13529
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Log:
We now analyze regex expressions as pattern/action pairs and grammars as
collections of those pairs. The initial-constant-strings approach
is now generalized to initial DFAable pattern
12 matches
Mail list logo
