Thanks! Applied in r16183.
chromatic via RT wrote:
With ICU optional these days, is this still necessary?
Since Windows doesn't ship with a C compiler and this toolkit is one of
the easiest ways to get hold of one for free, then yes, it's good to
have it documented. (It may be *called* the C++ toolkit, but it's also
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> chromatic via RT wrote:
>> With ICU optional these days, is this still necessary?
>>
> Since Windows doesn't ship with a C compiler and this toolkit is one of
> the easiest ways to get hold of one for free, then yes, it's good to
> have it documented. (It may be *ca
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to
complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and inform them of
the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have
caused the error.
Dear all
I hope I am sending this to the correct place.
I regularly use the RAII idiom in Perl 5 and C++ to automatically clean
up resources during object destruction.
I recently read a mail thread "Is RAII possible in Python?" at
http://www.thescripts.com/forum/thread25072.html and "Perl vs Pyt
On Dec 18, 2006, at 1:57 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote:
Be aware that you cannot use the verbose form of Emacs settings at
the beginning of a file, unless the file is shorter than 3000 bytes.
See Perl::Critic::Policy::Editor::RequireEmacsFileVariables policy
for more details:
So this means we need t
On Sun Dec 17 19:29:46 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> With ICU optional these days, is this still necessary?
I have a Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 lying around (I think), so, if I do,
I'll give this a try along with my Borland work.
> On Mon Nov 20 06:24:00 2006, stmpeters wrote:
> > It took some tweaking to get some of the warnings shut off, but the
> > attached patch actually gets the files to compile, although it doesn't
> > actually build a parrot to test with. Expect a few more patches over
> the
> > next week to finish
On 12/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat Nov 11 11:53:27 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Not sure if this is a bug or not, but I noticed that the open opcode
> creates its argument if the desired file doesn't exist.
>
There are two variants of the open opcode: this
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:02:35PM +, Blair Sutton wrote:
: Dear all
: I hope I am sending this to the correct place.
: I regularly use the RAII idiom in Perl 5 and C++ to automatically clean
: up resources during object destruction.
: I recently read a mail thread "Is RAII possible in Python?
Larry Wall wrote:
... (Perl 6 provides several ways that
are much handier than try/finally, and just about as handy as RAII.)
But baking such handicaps into every object merely guarantees it
will not scale well in the real world.
Thanks for the information. I mu
On 12/18/06, Blair Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree entirely that not all objects need this capability but some
certainly do. That is, the capability to execute code once every
reference of an object has been removed. Could you point to, or give an
example of the Perl 6 way for doing som
A few days ago, Larry posted this on Perlmonks
(http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=590147):
sub group ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is copy) {
gather {
while @array {
take [ # line 112
gather {
my $h = shift @array;
ta
Ron Blaschke wrote:
Seems like the old Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 is discontinued.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/visualc/aa336490.aspx
Aha. If you would have a moment to write these latest changes into
readme.win32.pod and send in a patch, that'd be awesome; otherwise I'll
get to it when I
A few days ago, Larry posted this on Perlmonks
(http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=590147):
sub group ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is copy) {
gather {
while @array {
take [ # line 112
gather {
my $h = shift @array;
ta
Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did something break? If so, I'll add a test. Otherwise, what's
> wrong with this code?
I noticed this as well, and believe it's a bug -- pugs accepts
the code if you remove all the newlines. Then again, I'm not
sure this is the desired behavior:
pugs> grou
--- Sean O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed this as well, and believe it's a bug -- pugs accepts
> the code if you remove all the newlines. Then again, I'm not
> sure this is the desired behavior:
>
> pugs> group(1..10)
> ((1,), (2,), (3,), (4,), (5,), (6,), (7,), (8,), (9,
Author: larry
Date: Mon Dec 18 17:50:54 2006
New Revision: 13493
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
Nitty infrastructural routines probably shouldn't rely on multiple dispatch or
optional args, so we now have .call, .callc and .callv forms.
Also added .goto variants for tail call enfo
On Sat Dec 16 14:35:24 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Affected files:
>
> /README.win32.pod
>
> ...
>
Applied in r16187, thanks!
Jonathan
19 matches
Mail list logo
