Author: particle
Date: Fri Nov 17 07:38:13 2006
New Revision: 15628
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd07_codingstd.pod
Log:
[PDD07]: minor spelling fix
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd07_codingstd.pod
==
--- trunk/docs/pdds/p
On Friday 17 November 2006 07:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -There should be one space between C keywords and following open
> parentheses,
> +There should be one space between C keywords and following
> open parenthesis, e.g. C.
Hm, it seemed more correct to me before, as "keywords" is plural.
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:07:30AM -0800, chromatic wrote:
: On Friday 17 November 2006 07:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: > -There should be one space between C keywords and following open
: > parentheses,
: > +There should be one space between C keywords and following
: > open parenthesis, e.g
Author: chromatic
Date: Fri Nov 17 11:13:12 2006
New Revision: 15633
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd07_codingstd.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/ (props changed)
Log:
[PDD] Removed further ambiguity from keyword/function and parenthesis spacing.
Modified
HaloO,
Smylers wrote:
TSa writes:
... one question remains that might actually make Duncan's proposal
pointless.
Didn't Larry actually accept Darren's proposal and add the C and
C operators?
He did. But I don't understand exactly how the coercive semantics
of the numeric and string compar
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 04:25:30PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Looking through the table provided, I ran across the following:
:
:$_ $xType of Match ImpliedMatching Code
:== = ==
:HashHash hash keys identical
Larry Wall wrote:
Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Looking through the table provided, I ran across the following:
:
:$_ $xType of Match ImpliedMatching Code
:== = ==
:HashHash hash keys identical match if $_.keys.s
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 04:57:59PM +0100, TSa wrote:
: But I don't understand exactly how the coercive semantics
: of the numeric and string comparisons are achieved. I assume there
: are protos defined with signature :(Any,Any) that coerce the args
: to numeric or string and re-dispatch. Right? I
On Friday 17 November 2006 10:30, Larry Wall wrote:
> Or maybe we need to revise English to remove implicit junctionals, since
> plurals tend to default to all() rather than any() unless in the presence
> of a one(), in which case it's merely ambiguous...
Next you'll argue that proof-carrying cod
> So maybe we have some or all of:
>
> .keys .sortkeys
> .values .sortvalues
> .kv .sortkv
> .pairs.sortpairs
>
> Possible variations: .skeys, .ordkeys, etc. Also could flip the
> default and make .keys sort by default and then you use .rawkeys to get
> unor
10 matches
Mail list logo
