[perl #40646] [TODO] PGE - add tests for , , etc.

2006-11-02 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud # Please include the string: [perl #40646] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40646 > Anyone want to contribute some cool tests? I've just checked in code to add combi

Re: mmd-draft.txt

2006-11-02 Thread TSa
HaloO, Audrey Tang wrote: > A variant's score cards only records two Boolean values for each > variant: "voting" and "qualified". Here is a summary of the explanation Audrey gave me on #perl6. Note that this is from memory because I didn't save the log. In particular I don't remember exactly whe

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r13377 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2006-11-02 Thread audreyt
Author: audreyt Date: Thu Nov 2 03:00:10 2006 New Revision: 13377 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod Log: * S03: Missing semicolon. * S06: Missing comma. (spotted by cognominal++.) Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r13379 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2006-11-02 Thread audreyt
Author: audreyt Date: Thu Nov 2 03:23:56 2006 New Revision: 13379 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod Log: * S03: Explicitly mention .=meth in the term level. * Also explicitly mention that the implicit topic for .meth and .=meth is $_. Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod ==

Re: mmd-draft.txt, why coercions

2006-11-02 Thread TSa
HaloO, I have one further question to the document. It mentions chains of type coercions that are applied in the compatibility stage. A type that has fewer conversion steps is considered more specific. But is that a wise thing to do in an MMD system? I would expect no coercions to occur. How can

[svn:parrot-pdd] r15090 - trunk/docs/pdds/clip

2006-11-02 Thread bernhard
Author: bernhard Date: Thu Nov 2 10:42:07 2006 New Revision: 15090 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd09_gc.pod Log: satisfy t/doc/pod.t Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd09_gc.pod == --- trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd09_gc

[perl #40653] [CAGE] [TODO] test pdd format

2006-11-02 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay # Please include the string: [perl #40653] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40653 > all PDDs must follow the format laid out in docs/pdds/pdd_template.pod, as discussed in pdd

[svn:parrot-pdd] r15094 - trunk/docs/pdds

2006-11-02 Thread ambs
Author: ambs Date: Thu Nov 2 14:30:07 2006 New Revision: 15094 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd03_calling_conventions.pod Log: Changed pre-formatted text to standard POD. Now we can LaTeX it without problems. Not perfect, but better. Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd03_calling_conventions.pod ===