Tests 14 and 15 in t/examples/shootout.t fail on Linux/PPC because
jit_set_args_pc does not handle floating point arguments correctly. I poked
at the code a little bit, but PPC is different enough with its relative
wealth of registers that I couldn't fix things trivially. (I'm not even sure
I
Author: audreyt
Date: Sat Sep 23 01:05:45 2006
New Revision: 12346
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
* S03: Cleanup capture-exploding examples such that |@foo always
simply put @foo's elements as positional arguments, regardless
of whether @foo[0] contains a Hash. (On
chromatic wrote:
> Tests 14 and 15 in t/examples/shootout.t fail on Linux/PPC because
> jit_set_args_pc does not handle floating point arguments correctly. I poked
> at the code a little bit, but PPC is different enough with its relative
> wealth of registers that I couldn't fix things triviall
On 9/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@args = [EMAIL PROTECTED],1,2,3;
-push [,] @args;# same as push @foo,1,2,3
+push [,] @args;# same as push(@foo: 1,2,3)
I don't quite understand this. Shouldn't C<[,] @args> be equivalent to
C<[EMAIL PROTECTED],1,2,3>
Am Samstag, 23. September 2006 09:44 schrieb chromatic:
> Tests 14 and 15 in t/examples/shootout.t fail on Linux/PPC because
> jit_set_args_pc does not handle floating point arguments correctly. I
> poked at the code a little bit, but PPC is different enough with its
> relative wealth of registers
From: Jerry Gay (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:38:40 -0700
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #40392]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id
在 Sep 23, 2006 8:36 PM 時，Markus Laire 寫到：
On 9/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@args = [EMAIL PROTECTED],1,2,3;
-push [,] @args;# same as push @foo,1,2,3
+push [,] @args;# same as push(@foo: 1,2,3)
I don't quite understand this. Shouldn't C<[,] @args
在 Sep 24, 2006 12:21 AM 時，Audrey Tang 寫到：
在 Sep 23, 2006 8:36 PM 時，Markus Laire 寫到：
On 9/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@args = [EMAIL PROTECTED],1,2,3;
-push [,] @args;# same as push @foo,1,2,3
+push [,] @args;# same as push(@foo: 1,2,3)
I don't
On 9/23/06, Audrey Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
在 Sep 23, 2006 8:36 PM 時，Markus Laire 寫到：
> On 9/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> @args = [EMAIL PROTECTED],1,2,3;
>> -push [,] @args;# same as push @foo,1,2,3
>> +push [,] @args;# same as push(@foo:
S06 says:
=head2 Flattening argument lists
The reduce operator C<[,]> casts each of its arguments to a C
object, then splices each of those captures into the argument list
it occurs in. The unary C<|> sigil has the same effect on a single
argument.
...
Does this mean that [,] is a special "Re
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:53:36 +0200
Am Montag, 18. September 2006 03:56 schrieb Bob Rogers:
>The attached patch consolidates most of the existing stack-unwinding
> code into Continuation:invoke;
From: "Matt Diephouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:56:44 -0400
Unfortunately, this patch breaks Tcl. There seems to be some bug with
exceptions.
Here's the Tcl used for this example:
proc test {} {uplevel #0 {append}}
test
Hmm. I seem to have brok
From: Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:43:28 -0400
From: "Matt Diephouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:56:44 -0400
Unfortunately, this patch breaks Tcl. There seems to be some bug with
exceptions.
Here's the Tcl used fo
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try the attached patch. If it works, then we have a problem, because
here's the original comment (which I deleted) that went with this line
of code:
/*
* During interpreter creation there is an initial context
* and th
From: "Matt Diephouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:21:32 -0400
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try the attached patch . . .
That *does* work. I haven't applied it because it's not
necessarily urgent that Tcl work in trunk. I'm okay with
waiting a
The attached patch creates a C in C for
the exclusive use of the C ops. There is a minor boost in
functionality (i.e. C and C no longer have to nest
with respect to C and C because the patch gives them different
stacks), but the real reason for wanting to do this is to get the return
addresses
Author: audreyt
Date: Sat Sep 23 20:48:58 2006
New Revision: 12347
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
* S04: Wording and examples cleanup; no semantic changes.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
==
--- do
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Matt Diephouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:21:32 -0400
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try the attached patch . . .
That *does* work. I haven't applied it because it's not
necessarily urgent that Tcl w
18 matches
Mail list logo
