[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+=head1 Cross operators
+
+The final metaoperator is the C metaoperator. It applies the
+modified operator across all permutations of its list arguments. All
+C operators are of list infix precedence, and are list associative.
+
+The bare form of C is considered an ope
> svn log, speaking on larry's behalf (>):
> > +The string concatenating form is:
> > +
> > + X~X <1 2> # 'a1', 'a2', 'b1', 'b2'
> > +
> > +The C operator desugars to something like:
> > +
> > +[~]�( X <1 2> ) # 'a1', 'a2', 'b1', 'b2'
^
> If the C variant
Daniel (>), Carl (>>), svn log, speaking on larry's behalf (>>>):
> > +The string concatenating form is:
> > +
> > + X~X <1 2> # 'a1', 'a2', 'b1', 'b2'
> > +
> > +The C operator desugars to something like:
> > +
> > +[~]�( X <1 2> ) # 'a1', 'a2', 'b1', 'b2'
Thanks, applied - r14594.
* moved to tools/dev directory
* be sure to 'make testr' before looking at script results *but*
* disassemble did hang here during that - I killed it after it
accumulate 1.7 GB of memory.
* there might be some disassemble bug lurking somewhere, which doesn't
make me wonde
Author: larry
Date: Wed Sep 13 07:03:51 2006
New Revision: 11976
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
typo spotted by Carl Mäsak++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
在 Sep 4, 2006 2:11 AM 時，Gaal Yahas 寫到：
Unless I'm mistaken, this doesn't cast back to subroutine signature
land
very well:
sub f1 (Dog ($fido, $spot)) { ... }
sub f2 (Dog $ ($fido, $spot)) { ... }
sub f3 (Dog :($fido, $spot)) { ... }
Correct.
Unless Audrey's latest S
Avi Bryant and Piers Cawley have some thoughts about improving method dispatch
speed for the common case, based on ideas in Sun's Strongtalk and the Self
language:
http://www.bofh.org.uk/articles/2006/09/13/what-we-have-here-is-an-opportunity-to-accelerate
http://smallthought.com/avi/?p=16
Is t
Author: larry
Date: Wed Sep 13 11:05:34 2006
New Revision: 11977
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
Metamethod revamp.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.p
On 13 Sep 2006, at 18:42, chromatic wrote:
Avi Bryant and Piers Cawley have some thoughts about improving
method dispatch
speed for the common case, based on ideas in Sun's Strongtalk and
the Self
language:
http://www.bofh.org.uk/articles/2006/09/13/what-we-have-here-is-an-
opportunity-to-a
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 05:18:19PM +0300, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
> My 0.02 ???: CGI.pm will be better off redesigned and cleaned up, and
> for those wanting compatibility a module called CGI5.pm can be
> written.
>
> It will probably be very popular, like p5 regexes ...
Hear hear!
I wonder how
Where is .can documented?
I saw .can in one of the examples in the pugs distribution, but I didnt
know where it came from, viz., was it related to perl6 or the module
that had been imported.
Not quite sure how the following two statements can be consistent:
'imports from Perl5 modules dont w
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, David Cantrell wrote:
> I wonder how many people really use the HTML-generating bits of CGI.pm?
I'd guess a lot, since they are prominently documented in the CGI.pm
documentation and are used extensively throughout many of the examples
there. It would be quite natural for
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:08:03PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
> The word "CGI" generally speaks to an old, weak, and relatively
> inefficient technology ... modern proper stuff does not spin off a
> separate process for each server request; it reuses an existing
> server ala mod_perl.
To me t
在 Sep 11, 2006 2:07 PM 時，Trey Harris 寫到：
In a message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Richard Hainsworth writes:
I am trying to find out how to use (in perl6) perl5 modules that
contain subroutines.
Imports from Perl 5 modules don't currently work.
Actually, explicit imports do work (as of a coup
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:32:26AM -0700, Nuno Carvalho wrote:
> Have done some cleannig in the file t/compilers/pge/06-grammar.t, also
> haded one PMC to have an array of reasons to todo tests. Also haded a
> new test grammar.
>
> Attached to this message you can find a patch to
> 't/compilers/pg
At 11:05 AM -0700 9/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
+'x'.HOW.get_method_list; # get available methods for strings
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
+The C<.HOW.getmethods> method returns method-descriptors containing:
As you can see, there is
Author: larry
Date: Wed Sep 13 15:20:27 2006
New Revision: 11978
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
Clarified that interogative methods are also named unaries.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
==
--- d
Author: larry
Date: Wed Sep 13 17:36:38 2006
New Revision: 11979
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
regularized metaobject method names as requested by dduncan++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
==
At 5:00 PM +0100 9/13/06, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:08:03PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
> The word "CGI" generally speaks to an old, weak, and relatively
inefficient technology ... modern proper stuff does not spin off a
separate process for each server request; it reus
Actually, I used them a few times. I agree the model used for html
generation is inadequate for most any serious usage. However, if you
need to dynamicaly generate forms CGI.pm is unmatched. A modernized
equavalent for them would still be very usefull IMHO. Though I agree
it might be better put in
Hello,Because I will soon somewhat criticize Vishal's work, I would start by thanking him for his implementation that enabled me for the first time to experiment with parrot development.I have some new tests to contribute that reveal some bugs in Parrot_register_move().
Moreover the current impleme
21 matches
Mail list logo
