Trey Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [cperl-mode.el]
As you already noticed cperl-mode.el is a very strange piece of
software. It's probably misunderstood like astronomers in the Dark
Ages.
> Variables with twigils whose name matches something else are getting
> recognized incorrectly. Fo
Am Montag, 4. September 2006 00:15 schrieb Jonathan Worthington:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed at YAPC::Europe, here's my suggestions for two new core
> PMCs to handle:
>
> * References to a particular element in an aggregate type
> * References to a register
NB: typical usage for these besides dotnet: T
Hi,
at YAPC::EU vaxman.de bugged me to try and build Parrot on VMS.
As all I had with me was an emulated VAX on my WinXP notebook
(running VMS 7.3 and DEC C 6.0), I used that.
First I needed some time to build/test perl 5.8.8, but I think
I have it running now. Then I set out to Configure.pl Parr
Mark Stosberg wrote:
> S12 describes a feature to call sets of methods at the same time:
>
> http://feather.perl6.nl/syn/S12.html#Calling_sets_of_methods
>
> I would like the spec to clarify what happens to the return values of
> all these methods.
>
> I'm fine with a simple answer, such as th
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Sep 4 13:15:09 2006 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with mo
In the Objects chapter, a WALK pseudo-class is spec'ed for using
when calling sets of methods:
http://feather.perl6.nl/syn/S12.html#Calling_sets_of_methods
These are the arguments listed that can be used with WALK:
:canonical # canonical dispatch order
:ascendant # most-deri
2006/9/4, Ph. Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 14:25, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> Luke Palmer wrote:
> > On 9/3/06, Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Note that the variant /with/ the parameter can be considered an exact
> >> match, but but the variant /without/ it can
HaloO,
Luke Palmer wrote:
Removing abilities, counterintuitive though it may seem on the
surface, makes the type *larger*. It is not adding constraints, it is
removing them (you might not be able to call set($x) on this object
anymore).
Welcome to the co- and contra-variance problem again. We
On 9/2/06, Markus Laire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/2/06, Audrey Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is quite strange, as I cannot duplicate this failure mode; neither can
> others in #perl6. Nevertheless, I've attempted a fix. Can you try
> again with r12945?
It's too late to do it tod
Am Montag, 4. September 2006 13:02 schrieb Vorländer, Martin:
> Bear with me on the VMSish filenames; "xxx;1" is the original
> version, "xxx;" is the patched version of the file.
I wrote a small perl helper, dealing with that. But what about filenames like:
+++ lib/parrot.configure/step.pm;
HaloO,
Trey Harris wrote:
I do not think that C should mutate its LHS, regardless what its
RHS is.
I strongly agree. We have the mutating version
$p but= { .y = 17 };
which is just one char longer and nicely blends as a meta operator.
But are assignment ops allowed as initializer?
my $z
Hi,
Tonight I've been working to get BCG to compile, link and pass its
tests on Windows. It does, but I also spotted that the include path
for BCG has been hard coded into the dynamic PMC build script, which
is a Bad Thing. I had to do a similar-ish (but less obviously evil
looking) thing
Am Dienstag, 5. September 2006 00:02 schrieb Jonathan Worthington:
most[1] of ...
> build/tools/dynpmc.pl
... should go away in favor of standard Makefile rules
my 2c
leo
[1] except generation of *_group for bundled PMCs.
Am Dienstag, 5. September 2006 00:54 schrieb Leopold Toetsch:
> most[1] of ...
>
> > build/tools/dynpmc.pl
>
> ... should go away in favor of standard Makefile rules
That answer was probably a bit too terse. Here are my thoughts:
1) perl Configure.pl creates all the settings to properly compile a
In a message dated Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Steffen Schwigon writes:
First you could try an older revision, I recommend r7845 or r10822 of
pugs repository.
No, neither of those work. To see what I'm talking about, just create a
file containing:
use v6-alpha;
class Point {
has $.x;
has $.y;
Mark Stosberg wrote:
In the Objects chapter, a WALK pseudo-class is spec'ed for using
when calling sets of methods:
http://feather.perl6.nl/syn/S12.html#Calling_sets_of_methods
These are the arguments listed that can be used with WALK:
:canonical # canonical dispatch order
:asce
On Monday 04 September 2006 16:21, Audrey Tang wrote:
> 2006/9/4, Ph. Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Excuse me for getting into this thread with only minor knowledge about
> > perl6, but will there be MMD based on the *value* of parameters? Like
> > Haskell has.
>
> Why, yes, see the various Unpack
In a message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Ph. Marek writes:
I now had a look at http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S06.html
but didn't find what I meant. Sorry if I'm just dumb and don't
understand you (or S06); I'll try to explain what I mean.
I don't think you're dumb; the Synopses just requ
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 07:52, Trey Harris wrote:
> I don't think you're dumb; the Synopses just require that you intuit
> certain things from each other, from examples in other Synopses, and so on
> in a Perlish sort of way; what you're looking for is not spelled out
> explicitly. It can be
Leo wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Bear with me on the VMSish filenames; "xxx;1" is the original
> > version, "xxx;" is the patched version of the file.
>
> I wrote a small perl helper, dealing with that. But what
> about filenames like:
>
> +++ lib/parrot.configure/step.pm;
>
> which actually is:
20 matches
Mail list logo
