I wrote:
[snip]
I suppose trying to make '@' mean something different for signatures and for
calls from C (as I have done) is a Bad Idea as long as the same code is used
to parse the signatures in both cases. The easy solution is to choose
a character
other than '@' for one of the directions thou
Good afternoon,
After some, always healthy, discussion on #parrot I've started a
very simple test file to evaluate some very simple PGE grammars. The
few grammars included in the test should work ok, except test #7 which
is supposed to fail with the current PGE. After the needed PGE
corrections
I've written up some stuff about why consting is good. It's in the
Parrot repository as cage/consting.pod.
To my old p5p homies: I send this to you so you don't forget about
consting while I'm working over here in Parrotland!
xoxo,
Andy
=head1 Why consting is good
In Perl, we have the C
在 2006/8/12 上午 3:01 時，jerry gay 寫到：
for "managed," i have a few ideas. currently, the suite lives in the
pugs repo. this is a fine first approximation, but i believe it will
soon be time to move this suite (it doesn't make sense to keep the
"official" tests in a non-official repo in the long ter
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 02:06:27PM +0800, Agent Zhang wrote:
>is $got, $expected, todo :pugs<6.2.13>, :p6p5<0.110>;
>
> Happily, Audrey has already implemented the $?PUGS_VERSION variable,
> which can ease the implementation of such &todo subs:
I've added a %?CONFIG variable which I propose
e
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:32:47PM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote:
>
> ?b 2006/8/12 ?W?? 3:01 ???Ajerry gay ?g???G
>
> >the question is, should it be moved into their own repository, or
> >into the repo of
> >the "official" perl6 implementation (if such a beast will indeed
> >exist,)
>
> Currentl
On 8/12/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
for "managed," i have a few ideas. currently, the suite lives in the
pugs repo. this is a fine first approximation, but i believe it will
soon be time to move this suite[3]. the question is, should it be
moved into their own repository, or into the
在 2006/8/12 下午 6:15 時，Nicholas Clark 寫到：
There's nothing technical stopping the Perl 6 tests being on
svn.perl.org,
but in a different svn repository from the current repositories, is
there?
Well, technically yes, except that SVK doesn't support svn:external yet.
Setting a svn:external pro
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 09:44:38PM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote:
> That's assuming that the new repo, say, http://svn.perl.org/
> perl6tests/, can
> give out commit permissions to parrot and pugs committers, yes.
>
> But as Jerry's initial motivation was moving Perl 6 tests to a more
> official
>
[Time to stop spamming multiple lists. Followups to p6c for bikeshedding.]
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:30:22AM +0300, Gaal Yahas wrote:
: On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 02:06:27PM +0800, Agent Zhang wrote:
: >is $got, $expected, todo :pugs<6.2.13>, :p6p5<0.110>;
: >
: > Happily, Audrey has already i
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:00:19 +0200
The continuation barrier is only one nastyness of inferior runloops. The
second problem with it is that it heavily influences the guts of garbage
collection . . .
See "Method Overloading and GC Issu
Am Samstag, 12. August 2006 17:55 schrieb Bob Rogers:
>From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>See "Method Overloading and GC Issues" in Cfunc.pod. The only way
>IMHO to avoid this problem is to run GC at "safe" points at the
>runloop level . . .
>
> Had you considered keeping t
12 matches
Mail list logo
