Re: Continuous testing tools

2006-06-09 Thread Nik Clayton
Geoffrey Young wrote: Since you're using C++, you can probably use libtap (http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2006/01/19/libtap.html and http://jc.ngo.org.uk/trac-bin/trac.cgi/wiki/LibTap) for writing the tests and then you could use a Perl harnes to collect those results. just out of curiosity

Re: Continuous testing tools

2006-06-09 Thread Geoffrey Young
Nik Clayton wrote: > Geoffrey Young wrote: > >>> Since you're using C++, you can probably use libtap >>> (http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2006/01/19/libtap.html and >>> http://jc.ngo.org.uk/trac-bin/trac.cgi/wiki/LibTap) for writing the >>> tests and >>> then you could use a Perl harnes to coll

Re: Continuous testing tools

2006-06-09 Thread Adam Kennedy
Sorry for the lack of information, but PITA's design is fairly ambitious, and until the core testing loop is completed, absolutely every other part of it would block waiting for me to finish. So I've kept things mostly under wraps. With the core almost done (we've had to scrap a major componen

Re: Continuous testing tools

2006-06-09 Thread Adam Kennedy
Hi Andrew I know it's somewhat vapour at the moment, and I'm keeping somewhat quiet, but the new post-Audrey'fied PITA design is aiming at exactly what you have described. Initial deployment targets include a pugs smoker, parrot smoker, and CPAN Testers 2. Of course, I have no idea how you

[perl #39378] Pheme Segfault with Keyed Class Names

2006-06-09 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by chromatic # Please include the string: [perl #39378] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39378 > Hi there, I started to port Pheme's class names to the new keyed style. Applying this p

Re: Continuous testing tools

2006-06-09 Thread Andrew Savige
--- Adam Kennedy wrote: > I know it's somewhat vapour at the moment, and I'm keeping somewhat > quiet, but the new post-Audrey'fied PITA design is aiming at exactly > what you have described. Thanks for the reminder about PITA. I'd (unforgivably) forgotten about that project when I first enquire

Re: Continuous testing tools

2006-06-09 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-09 18:35]: > Sorry for the lack of information, but PITA's design is fairly > ambitious, Hmm, I just saw this: http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2006/04/our-conference-on-automated-testing.html The submission deadline has already passed, but I figure