On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:18:46PM -0500, jason gessner wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> Has anyone successfully used Devel::Cover under mod_perl to do
> coverage for a mason application?
>
> My preliminary experiments were mixed. I used D::C from my .pl
> handler file and ran apache with -X, but saw i
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 08:13:38PM -0700, Scott Wang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I got below error message from running "cover" to
> merge my coverage data, any clue? The "Magic number
> checking on storable file ..." message also shows up
> in my test log, I am wondering if this means that my
> coverag
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 08:29:09PM -0700, Scott Wang wrote:
> Thanks!...Scott
Does this mean everything is working OK for you?
"Deep recursion on subroutine" is just a warning, though Devel::Cover
seems to tickle it through B::Deparse fairly regularly. I'll try to do
something about that one wa
On 07/06/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let's use Perl 6 Grammars to define syntaxes. We are just about
to get this mindblowingly awesome tool for parsing; why insist on
tieing our feet together and having to hop around like that?
This is the smartest suggestion I've yet seen on th
Andrew Savige wrote:
> We are looking at introducing continuous builds/smoke tests at
> work across a number of platforms (mainly Windows and Unix),
> building a number of different languages (mainly C++).
>
> I quick google uncovered the list below.
>
> Anyone got any advice?
I would advise k
> Since you're using C++, you can probably use libtap
> (http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2006/01/19/libtap.html and
> http://jc.ngo.org.uk/trac-bin/trac.cgi/wiki/LibTap) for writing the tests and
> then you could use a Perl harnes to collect those results.
just out of curiosity, has anyone got
Michael Mathews wrote:
> This is the smartest suggestion I've yet seen on the subject, but, not
> being all *that* familiar with Perl6 Grammars (aren't they something
> like contextually-smart regexes?), can anyone give an example of Perl
> 6 code that uses grammars and can express some wiki-forma
* Michael Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-08 13:15]:
> This is the smartest suggestion I've yet seen on the subject,
> but, not being all *that* familiar with Perl6 Grammars (aren't
> they something like contextually-smart regexes?), can anyone
> give an example of Perl 6 code that uses gramma
I would recommend using a templating system as opposed to having calls
to include files in numerous pages. Even though it's minimal, it's
still duplication, and it can get rather messy.
I know that some people don't know about or don't like it, but I would
recommend setting things up in a Model-V
To bring this back around to the implementation portion in an effort
to get back on topic..
There are also sample grammars (for those who like samples in
addition to docs) available in the parrot source tree, e.g.:
http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk/compilers/tge/TGE/Parser.pg
http://svn.perl
Moin,
On Thursday 08 June 2006 15:11, Michael Peters wrote:
> Andrew Savige wrote:
> > We are looking at introducing continuous builds/smoke tests at
> > work across a number of platforms (mainly Windows and Unix),
> > building a number of different languages (mainly C++).
> >
> > I quick google u
I was just reading the AES referenced above and I can say now that I'm
really happy about some changes to Regexes, and that a grammar may
well be what we're looking for. However, even with this great tool, we
still have to handle the implementation. Though I can see the benefit
of using the gramma
[...]
Also, what is the best place to begin learning the Perl6 syntax? A
tutorial would be great, as a dry technical specification of the
language doesn't teach very well.
IMHO examples teach the best. A table with "Perl5 version" versus "Perl6
version" examples - even one-liners - would be
On 08/06/06, Matt Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe this would be a good time to (semi-)formalize some form of
recommendations for the project?
Agreed. (We're talking about the minimal requirements to get the
thousand for a pswiki, right?) Will this work like the Perl 6
RFC-Roundup, where t
On Jun 8, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Tels wrote:
On my todo (well, wish list) is still a project that works rouhgly
like a
server/client model.
You upload a snapshot to the server, it notifies the clients, they
download the package, run the tests and report the result back.
Reports
are viewed on t
Moin,
On Thursday 08 June 2006 18:10, Chris Dolan wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Tels wrote:
> > On my todo (well, wish list) is still a project that works rouhgly
> > like a
> > server/client model.
> >
> > You upload a snapshot to the server, it notifies the clients, they
> > download the
Honestly, I'm not familiar with the Perl way of doing things, but I'm
open to learn especially because I see the Perl community going
through a (much-needed) reform. Thusly, I'm not familiar with the RFCs
(Request For Change?) but I do see the merit for something similar.
However, as far as the j
On 08/06/06, Matt Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Honestly, I'm not familiar with the Perl way of doing things, but I'm
open to learn especially because I see the Perl community going
through a (much-needed) reform. Thusly, I'm not familiar with the RFCs
(Request For Change?) but I do see the mer
On Jun 7, 2006, at 8:08 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
I had a look at this, but I'm not that good at Perl, and regular
expressions. However, I found where things go wrong, so someone who
really groks REs may fix it.
I'm no Abigail, :-) but I'll try to help.
THe problem is (well, at least I thi
[Sorry Michael, I didn't mean to send it you twice. :) ]
I like the RFC idea. I will read up on them and see, if it is a
particular format, how to simplify it. But, most definitely, the
community must have dialog about the requests. For each request
really.
On the architecture note, I've written
20 matches
Mail list logo
