Ovid wrote:
Larry pointed out that this topic is better suited
for perl6-language instead of perl6-users, so I'm
forwarding this along.
Is there a reason perl6-users isn't fed through to nntp.perl.org ?
Maybe it is but I don't know to which group?
"Michael Mathews" schreef:
> [compile down to a *language independent* format]
> So does that mean I can write a module in Perl 6, deliver it to Mr.
> Customer as byte-code. Then Mr. Customer can "decompile"(?) it into
> Python (or JavaScript, or C, etc), edit it, and then compile it back
> into w
Hi!
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:51:06PM +0200, Philippe "BooK" Bruhat wrote:
> Le mardi 23 mai 2006 ? 21:56, Thomas Klausner ?crivait:
> >
> > And no, I won't take the fun out of CPANTS.
>
> Then why did you filter out the Acme modules from the prereq lists? Mmm?
>
> For example, see http://cp
mAsterdam schreef:
> Ovid:
>> Larry pointed out that this topic is better suited
>> for perl6-language instead of perl6-users, so I'm
>> forwarding this along.
>
> Is there a reason perl6-users isn't fed through to nntp.perl.org ?
> Maybe it is but I don't know to which group?
news://nntp.perl.o
Hi Affijn,
As I gradually learn how Parrot works, I see that perhaps the idea of
decompiling byte-code into language ___ is only a pipe-dream. But the
point still remains--using the fact that one *could* mix languages X,
Y, and P into your company's source tree is a very weak argument for
Parrot/
> As I gradually learn how Parrot works, I see that perhaps the idea of
> decompiling byte-code into language ___ is only a pipe-dream. But the
> point still remains--using the fact that one *could* mix languages X,
> Y, and P into your company's source tree is a very weak argument for
> Parrot/Pe
* Michael Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-26 12:45]:
> In the end it was decided to rewrite that chunk in Perl. I can
> tell you, there definitely was cursing in the office that day,
> and I doubt anyone there would see it as a plus to have the
> ability to mix languages more easily. I just wo
On 26/05/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Michael Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-26 12:45]:
> In the end it was decided to rewrite that chunk in Perl. I can
> tell you, there definitely was cursing in the office that day,
> and I doubt anyone there would see it as a plus to hav
"Michael Mathews" schreef:
> [attribution repaired] Ruud:
>> [attribution repaired] Michael:
(Michael previously sent me an independent off-list reply; we're back on
the list now)
>>> As I gradually learn how Parrot works, I see that perhaps the idea
>>> of decompiling byte-code into language ___
Andy Lester wrote:
Here's an example of why I'm not real excited about CPANTS:
http://community.livejournal.com/perl/120747.html
Ironically, posted by someone that also makes all her modules phone home
at install time.
Adam K
I'm now settled in my new job (and new appartment), the new and
improved CPANTS is running on a new server (provided by yi.org, thanks
again to Tyler MacDonald!). So basically all the time I can spend on
CPANTS will go into new tests (eg a check if used modules (minus stuff
in Module::Co
Oh, and by the way...
What the hell is the "run" thing in the latest run... is the run just
half-way through or something?
Adam K
[
I am sorry this will not respond directly to the message in question as
I have not seen it in my inbox. I hope the attribution is correct though.
]
On 5/26/06, Dr.Ruud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Not really. Think about a Cobol-to-Parrot translator. You could for
>> example use Perl (glu
All:
In tracking down why building parrot with mingw was failing, I discovered
that the culprit was having msys in my PATH even if I wasn't intentionally
trying to use it.
There are 3 interesting things to note:
1. It does not matter what msys is actually called - renaming the directory
to foo h
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
> All:
> In tracking down why building parrot with mingw was failing, I discovered
> that the culprit was having msys in my PATH even if I wasn't intentionally
> trying to use it.
>
> There are 3 interesting things to note:
> 1. It does not matter what
On 5/26/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know anything about either msys or mingw, so I don't really know
what to recommend.
I'm afraid I don't understand what a patch would actually try to do.
From your previous message, it looks like sh.exe is changing the path
delimiters
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
> On 5/26/06, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I don't know anything about either msys or mingw, so I don't really know
> > what to recommend.
> >
> > I'm afraid I don't understand what a patch would actually try to do.
> > From your pr
"Gabor Szabo" schreef:
> {Cobol etc.]
> IMHO - and I really saw only a few such companies - these companies
> have 0 automatic tests so it would cost them a lot of time and money
> to test their application on the new and shiny Cobol compiler.
I once worked on tests for a national center of a ban
From a language standpoint, I think this is a great solution. As Jonathan
suggests, have a default knowledge base that is referenced by default, with
the option to declare more knowledgebases. Each one can have facts set and
queries exectued seperately. I have only a passing knowledge of Prolog,
Subject: Re: Unintended consequences
From: Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 09:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
}> From: Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
}>
}> Ironically, posted by someone that also makes all her modules phone home
}> at install time.
}
}Huh? Can you post an example? The logic
On 5/26/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message
> From: Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Andy Lester wrote:
> > Here's an example of why I'm not real excited about CPANTS:
> >
> > http://community.livejournal.com/perl/120747.html
>
> Ironically, posted by someone that
- Original Message
> From: Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Andy Lester wrote:
> > Here's an example of why I'm not real excited about CPANTS:
> >
> > http://community.livejournal.com/perl/120747.html
>
> Ironically, posted by someone that also makes all her modules phone home
> at in
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #39217]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39217 >
Remove the phrase "All Rights Reserved." from every copyright line in
every file in
Author: larry
Date: Fri May 26 09:57:12 2006
New Revision: 9310
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
Clarifications of inner type from sam++.
Deployment of julian++ at 200605252055, 8`lb + 7`oz, 20`in.
Ref: http://www.wall.org/cgi-bin/photo/index.cgi?mode=view&album=/pix/Julian
Mod
> "l" == larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
l> Log:
shouldn't that be "grandpa's log, earth date 200605252055"?
l> Deployment of julian++ at 200605252055, 8`lb + 7`oz, 20`in.
l>Ref:
http://www.wall.org/cgi-bin/photo/index.cgi?mode=view&album=/pix/Julian
so when does he get his co
On 5/23/06, Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right, but we should really ship with at least a set of Meta Object
Protocol Roles, that covers the core requirements that we will need for
expressing the core types in terms of themselves;
- classes and roles
- attributes and methods
- subsets (
--- Stevan Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/23/06, Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > People can diverge completely with completely incompatible
> > metaclasses that don't .do those roles, the only side effect
> > of which being that people who write code for the standard
> > Perl
* Michael Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-26 13:40]:
> But then I'm seeking to learn here so can you give a nice juicy
> example of a non-C library that would be a big plus to be able
> to include in Perl?
There are several Python projects that I wish I could use without
having to reimplement
How does this interact with files like:
./lib/Pod/Simple/HTML.pm:429:Copyright (c) 2002 Sean M. Burke. All
rights reserved.
and
./src/bignum.c:2:Copyright (c) 2001-2006 Yet Another Society. All
rights reserved.
and
./runtime/parrot/include/DWIM.pir:305:Copyright (c) 2003, Leopold
To
On 5/26/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andy Lester wrote:
> Here's an example of why I'm not real excited about CPANTS:
>
> http://community.livejournal.com/perl/120747.html
Ironically, posted by someone that also makes all her modules phone home
at install time.
Let's be clear,
On May 26, 2006, at 6:37 AM, Michael Mathews wrote:
I use the expat and libxslt libraries (both in C) regularly via perl,
so I guess I must agree that there is a distinction -- thank you for
clarifying that. But I can't think of any examples where I was stuck
because I couldn't use a "library" o
On May 26, 2006, at 20:25, Will Coleda wrote:
and
./runtime/parrot/include/DWIM.pir:305:Copyright (c) 2003, Leopold
Toetsch. All Rights Reserved.
just rewrite these (m/Toetsch/) to any needed format.
Thanks,
leo
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 12:37:31PM +0100, Michael Mathews wrote:
> I use the expat and libxslt libraries (both in C) regularly via perl,
> so I guess I must agree that there is a distinction -- thank you for
> clarifying that. But I can't think of any examples where I was stuck
> because I couldn'
The fundamental legal point is that we're not reserving all rights,
because we're distributing the code under an open source license. Many
open source developers include "All Rights Reserved." in a cargo-cult
fashion, without understanding what it means.
Will Coleda via RT wrote:
How does thi
> "Allison" == Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Allison> The fundamental legal point is that we're not reserving all rights,
Allison> because we're distributing the code under an open source
Allison> license. Many open source developers include "All Rights Reserved."
Allison> in a ca
Paul Johnson wrote:
I wouldn't have said anything, but your correction seems to indicate
that the (C) is important. Is my information outdated?
It wasn't a correction based on legal requirements, it was a correction
based on "this is what we talked about earlier and decided to
standardize t
(Randal L. Schwartz) via RT wrote:
According to Brad Templeton's copyright FAQ, it really doesn't mean anything
anyway. If I recall, It was needed in a few south american countries, all of
whom have become Berne-convention parties now, so it really means nothing.
It never meant "rights" in a l
I'm the student doing the summer of code project to implement STM in
parrot. I've created a branch of parrot named 'stm' for this purpose.
So, to start off, a copyright question:
It would be nice to use libraries that provide relatively portable
atomic operation support (needed for good implemen
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:57:40PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> >>Copyright notices should have the form:
> >>
> >> Copyright , The Perl Foundation.
>
> Whoops, typo, that's:
>
>Copyright (C) , The Perl Foundation.
Are you sure? As I understand things, the symbol (C), that is the
lette
Hi,
I used AI::Prolog once briefly, and that's the extent of my logic programming
knowledge. There do seem to be a few Perl 6 features that may be useful for
logic programming, although I'm not really qualified to judge.
How would one assert facts and rules in Perl6? How would one know
that a
40 matches
Mail list logo
