Hi Michael,
On 5/24/06, Michael Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh "try"! I like that! But is CATCH implemented in pugs? Anyone care
to give a working example of try/CATCH?
I don't think CATCH is implemented in pugs yet:
#!/usr/local/bin/pugs
catcher;
sub catcher {
say "here";
try {
(Responding to 3 notes on 2 mail lists here; Changed subject line.)
Juerd wrote:
> Feather, the semi-public, semi-private, Perl 6 development server, is
> available to host a Perl 6 wiki.
>
> The hostname www.perl6.nl is deliberately kept available for something
> like that.
Does that mean you a
The (oh so very cool) idea of implementing the perl 6 wiki IN perl 6
(eventually) is a powerful argument. I also concede that control
issues mean we don't want the official wiki to be on wikipedia. Kwiki
is already a perl-based wiki, but I have no experience using it. We
don't have to put perl 6 u
Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2006 00:30 schrieb Patrick R.Michaud (via RT):
> Vtable overrides don't appear to work in a once-removed subclass
> (i.e., a subclass of a subclass). It's easiest to explain with
> code:
Fixed now in r12797.
Thanks for the test.
leo
Please, for proper threading, don't reply to multiple messages at once.
Conrad Schneiker skribis 2006-05-25 1:46 (-0700):
> Juerd wrote:
> > Feather, the semi-public, semi-private, Perl 6 development server, is
> > available to host a Perl 6 wiki.
> > The hostname www.perl6.nl is deliberately ke
sligthly related to the Perl6 wiki issue,
is there a perldoc command or a podparser implemented in Perl6 already ?
Gabor
GS> The hard part is to make sure they won't write code to exploit other sites
or
GS> create hug load on your machine...
Any idea of how to avoid endless loops? :-)
Restricting execution time?
--
___
Andrew, [EMAIL PROTECTE
This topic may be better suited to perl6-language, unless you consider
its denizens to already be self-selected against logic programming. :)
Larry
All:
It has been 1.5 years since I have built parrot and a lot has changed.
Today I decided to dust off some old projects but I am having trouble
getting it to build. Previously, I used Cygwin.
I have mingw, msys, and ActiveState Perl
Unfortunately, I do not have permission to create files in
C
Author: larry
Date: Thu May 25 11:21:16 2006
New Revision: 9307
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
Clarifying the distinction between the "of" and "where" return types.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
===
- Original Message
From: David Romano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > duplicate results and this is almost always wrong. (See
> > http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/28378
> > for an SQL example of this problem).
> I re-read your journal entry and comments (I had read it back when you
> first had
Larry pointed out that this topic is better suited for perl6-language instead
of perl6-users, so I'm forwarding this along. Feel free to exercise your
"delete" key.
Cheers,
Ovid
-- If this message is a response to a question on a mailing list, please send
follow up questions to the list.
W
- Original Message
> From: David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> formatted. E.g. I believe this is sufficient to get the Kwalitee point:
>
> # t/pod_coverage.t
> __END__
> use Test::Pod::Coverage;
What? You think that's bad? Here are three lines from Acme::Code::Police:
$trick_that_n
"Michael Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So my question to the list is, in simple terms even an IT manager
> could grasp, explain what problems Perl 5 has that Perl 6 fixes,
> such that they would want to undergo the pain of ever switching.
>From a Perl point of view: there should be no pai
Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 21:56, Thomas Klausner écrivait:
>
> And no, I won't take the fun out of CPANTS.
Then why did you filter out the Acme modules from the prereq lists? Mmm?
For example, see http://cpants.perl.org/dist/Bot-MetaSyntactic
and http://cpants.perl.org/dist/Acme-MetaSyntactic-Re
While reading pdd23 and thinking of implementation strategies for
.begin_eh / .end_eh the following ideas jumped onto my branes:
- .begin_eh / .end_eh is by far not the only metainfo we want / need in
PBC files
- we already have debug info (line numbers / file info => PC relation)
- we need mo
Hi Steffen,
I'm glad you made that point. If I understand your statement, it's a
common "gain" cited by Perl 6 (actually Parrot) advocates: you can mix
languages. But a point I was trying to make was that while this is fun
for us developers, managers hate it, with very good reason. Having one
cru
Hello,
do not use msys. Try mingw32-make from cmd.exe.
http://wiki.kn.vutbr.cz/mj/index.cgi?Build%20Parrot%20with%20MinGW can
probably help too.
Michal Jurosz
Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
> All:
> It has been 1.5 years since I have built parrot and a lot has changed.
> Today I decided to dust off som
Hmm...
How about this:
Treat each knowledge base as an object, with at least two methods:
.fact() takes the argument list and constructs a prolog-like fact or
rule out of it, which then gets added to the knowledge base.
.query() takes the argument list, constructs a prolog-like query out
of it,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>+In either case this sets the C property of the container to C.
>+Subroutines have a variant of the C property, C, that
>+sets the C property instead. The C property specifies
>+a constraint to be checked upon calling C that, unlike the C
>+property, is not advertized as
* Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-25 20:45]:
> The first hurdle would be the syntax. The programmer just
> looking at the code would need to know when one section of code
> represents a snippet of logic programming. Is the following a
> function call or a Prolog fact?
>
> loves( 'foo', 'bar'
21 matches
Mail list logo
