> [coke - Tue Sep 06 07:41:09 2005]:
>
> Tests need to be written for PGE's glob.
>
>
Can this ticket be closed? We now have glob tests in
t/compilers/pge/pge_globs.t (and more can be added there, of course).
Pm
Darren Duncan wrote:
>>>Is there a reference for the meaning of these methods?
>>>
>>>
>>There are many written references to these methods; just type
>>"relational algebra" into Google.
>>
>>
>
>I will add that the first hit on such a search, the Wikipedia page on
>relational algebra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear perl-qa members,
I am pleased to announce the first public release of Test::Group, a
handy module for grouping batches of tests together. I use it to store
the whole test suite of my modules in an __END__ block, à la
perlmodlib, while keeping the
Instead of /ee say:
s/pattern/{ eval doit() }/
s/eval/try/ ?
--
Affijn, Ruud
"Gewoon is een tijger."
Dr.Ruud skribis 2006-05-05 15:25 (+0200):
> > s/pattern/{ eval doit() }/
> s/eval/try/ ?
No, string eval stays eval. Only block eval is renamed to try.
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html
http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html
# New Ticket Created by Andy Lester
# Please include the string: [perl #39085]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39085 >
Each .pmc file has redundant function headings. For example, in src/
pmc/integer.c
/*
Juerd schreef:
> Dr.Ruud:
>> S05:
>>> s/pattern/{ eval doit() }/
>>
>> s/eval/try/ ?
>
> No, string eval stays eval. Only block eval is renamed to try.
Understood, but I was thinking about variants like
{ eval '' ~ doit() }
{ eval $\&doit }
and then wasn't sure anymore whether "eval doit()
There is a typo in S09 (patch included)
Also, S09 uses postfix ... to mean ..Inf but S03 uses ..* for this, so
one of these should likely be changed unless both are OK.
--
Markus Laire
patch-S09
Description: Binary data
S11, near the end:
s/beings/begins/
:)
--
Affijn, Ruud
"Gewoon is een tijger."
# New Ticket Created by Andy Lester
# Please include the string: [perl #39088]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39088 >
GCC has a number of attributes that we can slap on functions. For
example, GCC's ana
Author: larry
Date: Fri May 5 15:27:43 2006
New Revision: 9120
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S11.pod
Log:
Typos from Dr.Ruud and Marcus Laire.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
Author: petdance
Date: Fri May 5 14:47:39 2006
New Revision: 12523
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd02_vtables.pod
Log:
teeny tweak of passive voice
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd02_vtables.pod
==
--- trunk/docs
At 8:01 PM +1200 5/5/06, Sam Vilain wrote:
Also, I don't agree with the notion of a "header" of each relation. It
has a type for each tuple item, sure, but "header" just sounds like the
sort of thing you want in a ResultSet, not a Relation.
Sam.
A relation's heading is essentially the definitio
Author: larry
Date: Fri May 5 15:02:52 2006
New Revision: 9119
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
Clarified that parens are required on C-style loop.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/
I made the Makefile's handling of ctags a lot smarter, so that the
tag refers to the .pmc file, instead of the .c file, for example.
And I put the tags file in Subversion.
xoxo,
Andy
On May 5, 2006, at 9:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: petdance
Date: Fri May 5 19:40:55 2006
New Re
First of all, Sam Vilain, thank you for your responses.
Giving these issues more thought, I'm am now leaning towards the idea
that the best way to provide relational algebra in Perl 6 is that the
relation-land Tuple and Relation each be a Role which various other
classes can provide to their u
16 matches
Mail list logo
