Re: [perl #37850] [BUG] tcl build trouble on win32

2006-04-25 Thread Francois PERRAD
At 14:04 24/04/2006 -0700, jerry gay wrote: On 4/22/06, Will Coleda via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This issue is long dead, isn't it? > this has been fixed some time ago, yes. however, tcl's not building for me right now for a different reason... This linkage is broken on Win32 since revis

[perl #38975] [PATCH] Update PLATFORMS

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
YY/7 20060210 -sol8-sparc-gcc3.4.3 B--- - - YY/6 20060210 +sol8-sparc-cc B--- - - YY/41 20060425 sol9-sparc-gcc3.3.2 B-Y/2 - Y YY/2 20050814 sol10-sparc-cc_5.8 BY-- Y Y

[perl #38976] ResizablePMCArray uses too much memory

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #38976] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38976 > t/pmc/intlist_3.pasm, t/pmc/intlist_4.pasm, t/pmc/resizablebooleanarray_16.pasm, and

[perl #38978] [PATCH] Fix unitialized register error in t/pmc/file.t

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #38978] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38978 > The following patch fixes what I presume is a typo in t/pmc/file.t. Previously, I e

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r8941 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2006-04-25 Thread autrijus
Author: autrijus Date: Tue Apr 25 08:48:59 2006 New Revision: 8941 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod Log: * S03: Cleanups. * There's no "$s xxx" postfix form anymore -- write "$s xx *". * "@a === @a" is sufficient to illustrate the reference-identity point, not "[EMAIL PROTECTED] === [E

[perl #38979] [PATCH] Explictly close file in t/pmc/mmd.t

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #38979] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38979 > For quite some time, I've been getting the following error in t/pmc/mmd.t: t/pmc/mm

Re: [perl #38979] [PATCH] Explictly close file in t/pmc/mmd.t

2006-04-25 Thread Will Coleda
Thanks, applied as r12424. On Apr 25, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote: # New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #38979] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38979

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r8942 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2006-04-25 Thread autrijus
Author: autrijus Date: Tue Apr 25 09:03:00 2006 New Revision: 8942 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod Log: * S02, 03, 04, 06: Remove all occurrence of "tuple" and replace it with "Seq". A "Se

Re: [perl #38978] [PATCH] Fix unitialized register error in t/pmc/file.t

2006-04-25 Thread chromatic
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 08:34, Andy Dougherty wrote: > The following patch fixes what I presume is a typo in t/pmc/file.t. > Previously, I expect the only reason it was passing for some folks is that > unused I registers are somehow automatically set to 0 on Linux/x86. I'm not entirely sure that

Re: MSWin32 (Visual C++ 8.0) Test Results (r12017)

2006-04-25 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 25 March 2006 07:47, Ron Blaschke wrote: > t/configure/step.t > $fromfile and $tofile needs to be closed before calling > move_if_diff, as Windows can't delete open files. I forgot to check this in a while back, but fixed now as #16032 (I hope). -- c

[perl #38975] [PATCH] Update PLATFORMS

2006-04-25 Thread Will Coleda via RT
Thanks, applied as r12427.

Re: [svn:perl6-synopsis] r8942 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2006-04-25 Thread Amos Robinson
Just saw a typo in S02: s/unrecogized/unrecognized/ "If the unrecogized subname is followed by postcircumfix:<( )>, it is compiled as a provisional function call of the parenthesized form." On 4/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: autrijus > Date: Tue Apr 25 09:03:00 2006

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r8943 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2006-04-25 Thread autrijus
Author: autrijus Date: Tue Apr 25 09:37:36 2006 New Revision: 8943 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod Log: * S02: Cleanup provisional-call text a bit, adding some more examples, and note that method calls are never provisional and cannot be invalidated. Modified: doc/trunk/d

Re: Test me please: P/PE/PETDANCE/Test-Harness-2.57_06.tar.gz

2006-04-25 Thread Adrian Howard
On 24 Apr 2006, at 15:51, Shlomi Fish wrote: [snip] Am I missing something or isn't that what Test::Harness:Straps/Test::Run::Straps are for? If not, I suppose I can extract a class out of Test::Run::Straps that will provide a reusable TAP parser. [snip] In addition to Michael's and chroma

[perl #38982] [TODO] refactor long test files

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38982] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38982 > some test files are too long to be maintainable. for example, t/op/calling.t is ~2400 line

[perl #38983] [PDD] review PDD01_overview.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38983] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38983 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38985] [PDD] review PDD04_datatypes.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38985] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38985 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38987] [PDD] review pdd06_pasm.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38987] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38987 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38989] [PDD] review pdd08_keys.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38989] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38989 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38991] [PDD] review pdd10_embedding.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38991] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38991 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38992] [PDD] review pdd11_extending.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38992] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38992 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38993] [PDD] review pdd12_assembly.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38993] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38993 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38994] [PDD] review pdd13_bytecode.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38994] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38994 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38996] [PDD] review pdd15_objects.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38996] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38996 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38997] [PDD] review pdd16_native_call.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38997] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38997 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38998] [PDD] review pdd17_basic_types.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38998] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38998 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38999] [PDD] review pdd18_security.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38999] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38999 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #39000] [PDD] review pdd19_pir.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #39000] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39000 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #39002] [PDD] review pdd23_exceptions.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #39002] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39002 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #39003] [PDD] review pdd24_events.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #39003] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39003 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #39004] [PDD] review pdd25_threads.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #39004] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39004 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38986] [PDD] review PDD05_opfunc.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38986] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38986 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38988] [PDD] review pdd07_codingstd.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38988] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38988 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38984] [PDD] review pdd02_vtables.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38984] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38984 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38990] [PDD] review pdd09_gc.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38990] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38990 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #38995] [PDD] review pdd14_bignum.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #38995] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38995 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

[perl #39001] [PDD] review pdd22_io.pod

2006-04-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #39001] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39001 > This design document (found in docs/pdds/clip/,) requires review before it receives final

Re: [perl #38978] [PATCH] Fix unitialized register error in t/pmc/file.t

2006-04-25 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Apr 25, 2006, at 17:34, Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote: Previously, I expect the only reason it was passing for some folks is that unused I registers are somehow automatically set to 0 on Linux/x86. Unitialized I and N regs have more or less garbage. See also: $ ./parrot --help-debug $ ./p

S5 - Question about repetition qualifier

2006-04-25 Thread Joe Gottman
According to Synopsis 5, the repetition qualifier is now **{.} where the . must correspond to either an Int or a Range. This seems rather restrictive. Why are we not allowed a junction of Ints, for instance m/^ a**{1|3|5} $/ ; # Match 1,3, or 5 a's. This does not seem noticeably

Re: About STM in Parrot

2006-04-25 Thread Caio Marcelo
On 4/21/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > STM would be definitely a very interesting and worthy project. There > was a bit of discussion about STM here on this list too. > > We are currently figuring out, which projects may be part of SoC. More > to come soon ... when / where ? =)

Re: S5 - Question about repetition qualifier

2006-04-25 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:57:58PM -0400, Joe Gottman wrote: > According to Synopsis 5, the repetition qualifier is now **{.} where the . > must correspond to either an Int or a Range. This seems rather restrictive. > Why are we not allowed a junction of Ints, for instance > > m/^ a*

Re: S5 - Question about repetition qualifier

2006-04-25 Thread Juerd
Jonathan Scott Duff skribis 2006-04-25 23:35 (-0500): > I get your point though. There's no easy way to say "match 1, 7, 12, or > 19" with this particular syntax. > How often does that come up in practice though? I don't think I've > ever wanted something like that. Quite often. A silly exampl