Hi @chip,
1)
Namespace Opcodes
add_namespace $P0, $P1
The opcode signature looks a bit strange to me, especially when compared
to the 'add_namespace' method. Is the namespace name implied? And there
is of course again the question where to add the namespace: relative to
HLL or
There are some opcodes in core.ops which don't do anything:
I'd do:
setline ... delete, doesn't make sense
getline ... move to debug.ops, implement it
setfile ... delete
getfile ... mpve to debug.ops, implement it
setpackagedelete
getpackagedelete - use get_namespace
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:16:37PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> There are some opcodes in core.ops which don't do anything:
>
> I'd do:
>
> setline ... delete, doesn't make sense
> getline ... move to debug.ops, implement it
> setfile ... delete
> getfile ... mpve to debug.ops,
On 2005-07-09, Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/kwalitee.html says:
>
> What is kwalitee?
>
> Kwalitee is inexact quality. We don't know exactly what it is,
> but we know it when we see it.
>
> Isn't that backwards? I thought 'kwalitee' was suppos
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 13:15, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> Kwalitee are precise metrics which strive to approximate quality. The
> name is intentionally different to convey that Kwalitee is related to
> "quality", but not quite the real thing. That's because we don't know
> exactly what quality
"Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are some opcodes in core.ops which don't do anything:
I'd do:
setline ... delete, doesn't make sense
getline ... move to debug.ops, implement it
setfile ... delete
getfile ... mpve to debug.ops, implement it
Where getline and ge
"Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yup, and I really, really don't like the idea of making our bytecode
format non-portable. Part of the point of having a VM is portability,
right?
The described mapping doesn't have any PBC portability issues AFAIK. If
'L' is mapping to 'I' or not
I tried upgrading my gentoo box from parrot 0.4.0 to 0.4.2 by copying
the ebuild for 0.4.0 to 0.4.2 and emerging that.
It failed in the make install phase when it tried to install the
installable_ files to the live filesystem rather than to the install
target tree.
The ebuild calls make install w
On Mar 8, 2006, at 22:55, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
The described mapping doesn't have any PBC portability issues AFAIK.
If 'L' is mapping to 'I' or not is chosen at runtime.
Wouldn't the required re-writing blow away the wins we get through
mmap'ing in bytecode files?
There isn't any re
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:50:17PM +, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> I've got a test suite built with Selenium, but I would like to the
> output in TAP to centralize the reporting, perhaps using Smolder once I
> Smolder installed.
Great idea. I just looked at Smolder and it seems awesome. I'm
excit
10 matches
Mail list logo
