# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #38670]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38670 >
This was posted in p6i by Steve Peters, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks to the work
When installing a module ( in this case Sub-Uplevel-0.09 on 5.8.8)
using CPANPLUS I saw many warnings passing by but as all the tests
were successful the report to the CPAN Testers was sent as PASS.
it would be useful to capture warnings printed on the screen
and then even somehow report this mino
This email is to announce the birth of Smolder.
Smolder is a Web-Based Smoke Test Aggregator used by developers and testers to
upload (automated or manually) and view smoke/regression tests using the Test
Anything Protocol. Details and trends can be viewed in various formats (HTML,
XML, YAML) and
On Feb 28, 2006, at 19:27, Andy Dougherty wrote:
Executive summary -- svn co on Solaris 8 is still *slow*! I"ll stick
to fetching snapshots with wget.
Dumb question? Why 'svn co' instead of incrementally updating with 'svn
up'?
leo
On Feb 28, 2006, at 21:59, Tim Bunce wrote:
This can happen if the machine is busy.
Okay. Can't the test be made more robust? Or emit a warning note?
Probably yes with increased testing time (longer sleep) - a warning
note is always ok.
leo
On Feb 28, 2006, at 23:13, chromatic wrote:
Hi there,
I just managed to get Valgrind working on my Linux PPC box. Are
Valgrind
(memcheck, cachegrind, etc) reports useful from various platforms? If
so, is
there a good example PIR file to run that stresses sufficient code (or
should
someon
On Mar 1, 2006, at 1:26, Karl Forner wrote:
On 2/25/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fill the function body of Parrot_register_move() (src/utils.c 633
ff).
Parrot is now using this function [1] for recursive tailcalls. There
are
2 new tests in t/compilers/imcc/imcpasm/o
On Mar 4, 2006, at 05:58, Gabor Szabo wrote:
When installing a module ( in this case Sub-Uplevel-0.09 on 5.8.8)
using CPANPLUS I saw many warnings passing by but as all the tests
were successful the report to the CPAN Testers was sent as PASS.
it would be useful to capture warnings printed on t
Hi David,
could you send your changes as a patch to me or to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you additionally add your test results to PLATFORMS?
I suppose there needs to be some kind of config check for older 'libc5'.
The hints you passed to Configure.pl could probably also be put into a
hints file.
On Feb 28, 2006, at 19:59, Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
Yes I understand that there is different cores for Parrot, but what are
the flags appropriate for doing some comparisons ? Some flags might do
very good in some cases and quite bad in some others. They might also
take tremendous time to JIT the
On Mar 1, 2006, at 14:46, Will Coleda wrote:
We already have at least one language implementation that used to work
just fine using the stack, but has been crippled with various
deprecations over the last few years.
If you are speaking of forth here, then no. That was broken by design.
It j
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 at 08:52 -0800, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT...:
could you send your changes as a patch to me or to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my hack was not how anyone should implement it.
(I was just trying to get it to compile)
Could you additionally add your test results to PLATFORMS?
I tr
On Friday 03 March 2006 12:00, chromatic wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 March 2006 11:19, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > c - Did you have a chance to try my patch? If so,
> > did it work?
>
> It bypassed the build error, so that much definitely works better. I
> haven't finished running the test suite to see if
> $ time ./parrot -j fib.pir 30
> Fib(30): 1346269
>
> real0m4.774s
>
> Ok that's slow (AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED], unoptimized parrot build), you are
> right. But:
>
> $ time ./parrot -Cj fib.pir 30
> Fib(30): 1346269
-Cj does not produce different results than -j on the Win32 build of
Parrot.
* Yuval Kogman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060304 00:40]:
> I think Perl 6 could use a wiki for several things:
Last week, I was looking for ideas/plans about the required changes in
CPAN, and it was so increadibly hard to find the documents. People tend
to use SVN as substitute means of publication and
I believe befunge is the example I was thinking of.
On Mar 4, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
On Mar 1, 2006, at 14:46, Will Coleda wrote:
We already have at least one language implementation that used to
work just fine using the stack, but has been crippled with various
depreca
This is because the fact of being an :outer sub promotes its
context's C to a C, whether or not it
ever creates a closure. When the C is invoked to return,
it does no unwinding, leaving the control stack untouched on exit. The
action is effectively popped (and leaked, I'll wager), but it is ne
On 3/4/06, Mark Overmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing which is playing in my head already for some time is:
>
> Do we really want a translation from Perl5 modules into Perl6 on
> a one-to-one basis? There are so many deceased modules occupying
> beautiful name-spaces! Can we pleas
18 matches
Mail list logo
