round (was: Re: s29 diffs)

2006-02-27 Thread Ruud H.G. van Tol
Larry Wall schreef: > @@ -104,32 +115,34 @@ > =item round > > multi Num::round ( Num $x--> Int ) > + multi Int ( Num $x--> Int ) > > -Returns the nearest integer to $x, away from zero. In other words, > -the absolute value, rounded up. > +Returns the nearest integ

pi/atan/atan2 (was: Re: s29 diffs)

2006-02-27 Thread Ruud H.G. van Tol
Larry Wall schreef: > +=item pi > + > + constant Num Num::pi = atan(1,1) * 4; > + constant Int Int::pi = 3; > [...] > =item I > [...] > + multi Num::func ( Num $x: :$base = 'radians' --> Num ) > + multi Math::Trig::func ( Num $x = $+_, :$base = 'radians' --> Num ) > > where I is on

Re: Q: namespaces and classes

2006-02-27 Thread Chip Salzenberg
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:49:54PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > I'm still having troubles, when thinking about namespace PMCs and > implementation thereof. Especially the relationship of class namespaces > and the store_global opcode. As well you might. :-, There's a chicken/egg problem in t

Re: Namespaces (At Long Last)

2006-02-27 Thread Chip Salzenberg
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:41:21PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > On Dec 5, 2005, at 5:55, Matt Diephouse wrote: > >>- perl5: sometimes (via sigil, but $ref_tosub) > >>- perl6: maybe (sigil is part of the symbol name, but $ref) > > > >Functions, variables, and namespaces _are_ separate here. Don'

User stack: Worthwhile?

2006-02-27 Thread Chip Salzenberg
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 12:57:24AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > On Feb 24, 2006, at 0:23, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > >>[...] > >I've just committed an update (r11722) that eliminates PGE's > >use of save/restore opcodes in the code it generates -- indeed, > >PGE no longer has any save or restor

Re: [perl #38584] [BUG] Punie test failures in set_node method on Solaris/SPARC

2006-02-27 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Allison Randal via RT wrote: > > It looks like 'node.set_node' doesn't actually end up doing > > anything. > > Andy, could you try this again on the 0.4.2 release of Parrot? I cleaned > up the method declaration syntax just before the release. It might help. I haven't done a

[perl #38647] [PATCH] Standardize formatting of PDDs

2006-02-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal # Please include the string: [perl #38647] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38647 > The attached suggested patch standardizes the format of the completed PDDs to what'

Testing SQL and friends

2006-02-27 Thread Ovid
Hi all, I'm not proposing to write a Test::SQL module, but I am tired of having the following two things not being equivalent: CREATE TABLE foo ( id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, name VARCHAR(32) NOT NULL, title age INTEGER ); And: create table foo ( id

Re: make error on 9188

2006-02-27 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Sunday 26 February 2006 20:48, Beau E. Cox wrote: > Hi - > > My Sunday svn download / make of parrot and pugs > failed today; parrot revision 11753 built fine, but > pugs revision 9188 failed in make smoke and > make install: > > ... > Skipping Pugs.Run ( src/Pugs/Run.hs, dist/build/Pug

The Simple Life of Muhammad (SAWS)

2006-02-27 Thread frindes1
The Simple Life of Muhammad (SAWS) If we compare the life of Muhammad (Sallalhu alaihi wa sallam - SAWS) before his mission as a prophet and his life after he began his mission as a prophet, we will conclude that i

Re: Testing SQL and friends

2006-02-27 Thread Michael Peters
Ovid wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm not proposing to write a Test::SQL module, but I am tired of having > the following two things not being equivalent: > > CREATE TABLE foo ( > id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, > name VARCHAR(32) NOT NULL, > title > age INTEGER > ); >

Re: make error on 9188

2006-02-27 Thread chromatic
On Monday 27 February 2006 16:35, Beau E. Cox wrote: > Is it me or thee? Any ideas out there? I'm seeing the same thing on Linux PPC. -- c

Best practice for version control of locally installed CPAN modules

2006-02-27 Thread Matisse Enzer
I'm helping plan inmprovements to a build & deploy system and am wondering what people think is the "best practice" for handling version control of locally-installed CPAN modules. We have a bunch of code in version control (CVS now, moving to SVN soon) We also have a large number of CPAN module

Re: Best practice for version control of locally installed CPAN modules

2006-02-27 Thread Tyler MacDonald
Hello Matisse, I like these two ideas: Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2) Put the CPAN .tar.gz files in a local CPAN repository and use > CPAN::Site to install - that way we *only* get the versions in > our local CPAN repository and dependencies are managed by the >

Re: Best practice for version control of locally installed CPAN modules

2006-02-27 Thread Dr Bean
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Matisse Enzer wrote: > I'm helping plan inmprovements to a build & deploy system and am > wondering what people think is the "best practice" for handling > version control of locally-installed CPAN modules. > 3) Put the .tar.gz files in our source-code control system, and

Re: Best practice for version control of locally installed CPAN modules

2006-02-27 Thread Matisse Enzer
On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:14 PM, Dr Bean wrote: There is some interesting advice in the subversion book. Linkname: Vendor branches URL: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/ svn.advanced.vendorbr.html#svn.advanced.vendorbr.general Thanks - that looks interesting, although complica

Re: Best practice for version control of locally installed CPAN modules

2006-02-27 Thread Matisse Enzer
ess can take of resolving dependencies. The downside is having yet-another-repository. Whatever we do we would like to have a single-step build and release process: ./build_script.pl --build-number=20060227-001 --environment=QA and that will deploy both our code AND the CPAN modules we us