Luke Palmer skribis 2006-02-13 9:36 (+):
> That's a compile time error. Both "has" declarations generate a
> method "a", so it is a method conflict.
Doesn't normally double declaration end in the later masking/overriding
the earlier declaration, with a warning, but not an error?
I'd expect
On 2/13/06, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luke Palmer skribis 2006-02-13 9:36 (+):
> > That's a compile time error. Both "has" declarations generate a
> > method "a", so it is a method conflict.
>
> Doesn't normally double declaration end in the later masking/overriding
> the earlier dec
On 2/13/06, Yiyi Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For perl 6,
> Array and Scalar are in different namespace.
> So,
> class A { has $.a; has @.a };
>
> what will A.new.a return by default?
That's a compile time error. Both "has" declarations generate a
method "a", so it is a method conflict.
Luke
On 2/13/06, Amos Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think there's a typo in synopsis 5, "Indirectly quantified subpattern
> captures:"
> [ (\w+) \: (\w+ \h+)* \n ]**{2...}
> I have a feeling the \h should be *, not +.
It looks like you're right. Thanks, fixed.
Luke
Luke Palmer skribis 2006-02-13 9:46 (+):
> class Baz {
> does Foo;
> does Bar; # does this count as double declaration?
> }
I'd put composition and inheritance in a slightly different category
than accessor *generators*.
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_bl
On 2/10/06, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/8/06, via RT jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ~ copyright text in each text file will be replaced with the new
> > keyword for expansion
> > ~ committers will be instructed on setting their environments to
> > understand this custom ke
On Feb 12, 2006, at 6:52 PM, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
It would also be 'really nice' have a glob(3) like method that is
implemented as a wrapper around *dir methods so the semantics are
portable.
My outsider opinion is that parrot should focus on exposing basic OS
functions (opendir, readdir, c
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Allison Randal wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2006, at 9:56, Andy Dougherty via RT wrote:
> >
> > I too had seen this memory problem before on Solaris/SPARC, but I'm
> > pretty sure I saw it even when running t/past_node_5.pir directly.
> > However, trying again today, I'm happy to repo
From: "Robert via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:27:44 -0800
Passing to Ask to look at the bitcard issue.
Turns out this was a cookie problem; my browser was accepting cookies
from bitcard.org, but I wasn't aware that it was rejecting perl.org
cookies. I discovered th
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:28:40AM -0600, Chris Dolan wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2006, at 6:52 PM, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
>
> >It would also be 'really nice' have a glob(3) like method that is
> >implemented as a wrapper around *dir methods so the semantics are
> >portable.
>
> My outsider opinion is tha
On Feb 13, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:28:40AM -0600, Chris Dolan wrote:
On Feb 12, 2006, at 6:52 PM, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
It would also be 'really nice' have a glob(3) like method that is
implemented as a wrapper around *dir methods so the semantics ar
"Joshua Hoblitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think your slightly confusing OPs and PMCs. Presumably the *dir
functionality would be implemented as OP codes
I thought The Plan was to have all the I/O stuff done with PMCs rather than
ops in the end. There's no real benefit in having ops - the
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay
# Please include the string: [perl #38515]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38515 >
all PMCs (src/pmc/*.pmc) should be tested. the basic types, as defined
in PDD17 (docs/pdds
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:09:45PM -, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> "Joshua Hoblitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I think your slightly confusing OPs and PMCs. Presumably the *dir
> >functionality would be implemented as OP codes
> >
> I thought The Plan was to have all the I/O stuff done wit
Hello everyone,
This is my first post to the actual mailing list and not to Google Groups
(yeah, took me a bit to figure out they're not the same). I have a few
questions about the rules in Perl 6, and hopefully I'm not repeating stuff
that's already been brought up before. (I searched through the
On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:09:45PM -, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
I agree with Chris on minimising the amount of places we do security
stuff
as far as is sensible. However, I would think that the interface for
doing
sandboxing style stuf
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 02:21:19 +0100
On Feb 4, 2006, at 22:04, Bob Rogers wrote:
[detailed plan]
>Sound good? Unless I've missed something, this seems like a win
> across the board . . .
Sounds very good.
Unfortunately, I may
What's the difference between 'v' and '' for NCI function parameters?
Here, for example, is the code for 'fv' and 'f':
static void
pcf_f_v(Interp *interpreter, PMC *self)
{
typedef float (*func_t)(void);
func_t pointer;
struct call_state st;
float return_data;
18 matches
Mail list logo
