On 1/31/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 11:44, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
>
> > * chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-31 19:40]:
>
> > >Write your own. perldoc Test::Harness::Straps or see the
> > >examples in chapter 3 of the Perl Testing book:
> >
> > That's not
On 1/31/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 12:22, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> Adding more information to the default Test::Harness summary doesn't make
> sense to me. It's a user tool. It's important to list failures there, as
> the code might not work right, but unex
On 1/31/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 13:31, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
>
> > Hmm. That's a good point. Maybe the way to approach this would be
> > to include a default harness for use by developer tools, which
> > would include more chattiness about passing TODO te
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #38393]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38393 >
Hi,
when doing a 'make clean' I get an error from
make -C languages clean
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:36:47AM -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> OK, speaking of "Kwalitee", I saw cpants for the first time today.
> And saw that it claims to update every sunday, but there hasn't been an
> update since december 5th.
On the one hand I'm having problems with the serve
Joshua Isom (via RT) wrote:
When using JIT on FreeBSD 6.0, there are multiple failures in
t/op/trans.t. Most are geometric, sinh, tanh, and atan2, so these
might be covered by a previous report. But in particular are bugs in
pow. I've tried to track it down more specifically but I don't see
Hi -
The Makefile.PL in revision 8877 (perhaps eariler revisions too)
needs the following 'patch' (sed) to recgonize hs-plugins:
sed -i -e "s/'-package'/0, '-package'/" Makefile.PL
This adds a '0' argument to try_compile (run = 0); otherwise
ghc is compiled with:
ghc plugins --make -v0 -o ...
Nod, it's resolved in r8890 by removing the now-not-used $run.
Next time around, please commit ahead. :-) A commit bit is on your way.
Audrey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Larry Wall wrote:
> Here's results of r8894 on up-to-date Fedora Core 4 with embparrot
> r11392. Other the usual embparrot rules breakage, is looking pretty
> clean here even with bleadparrot. All the failures below look like
> rules coredumps to me, including the undef.t one.
Yay! I've fixed t
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:34 am, Audrey Tang wrote:
> Nod, it's resolved in r8890 by removing the now-not-used $run.
>
> Next time around, please commit ahead. :-) A commit bit is on your way.
>
> Audrey
Thank you for the commit bit; I will use it as you asked (I may have
questions before m
Hi -
Compiled/intstalled parrot-0.4.1 revision 11397 (svn). OK.
Downloaded pugs 6.2.11 revision 8909 (svn).
Link error:
...
Compiling Pugs ( src/Pugs.hs, dist/build/Pugs.o )
/usr/bin/ar: creating dist/build/libHSPugs-6.2.11.a
*** Building: /usr/bin/ghc -package stm -package network
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 00:26, demerphq wrote:
> And I think you've conveniently sidestepped my main point which is
> that TODO tests passing are errors.
I didn't sidestep it. I just disagree.
> Consider you have two TODO tests,
> both of which depend on a common set of functionality. Bo
Beau E. Cox wrote:
> Compiled/intstalled parrot-0.4.1 revision 11397 (svn). OK.
> Downloaded pugs 6.2.11 revision 8909 (svn).
r8927 added a probe to Makefile.PL: According to Leo, you need to keep
the original Parrot source tree around, and let Pugs find one of
src/{null,parrot,install}_config.o f
On the first anniversary of the Pugs project, I'm delighted to announce
Pugs 6.2.11 to the world.
The release tarball will be available from CPAN shortly:
http://pugscode.org/dist/Perl6-Pugs-6.2.11.tar.gz
SIZE = 2930469
SHA1 = 20b46eed2161e8cec2e85ecfc6b5137c30dcd0ac
Please see h
On Jan 31, 2006, at 16:26, Allison Randal wrote:
This'll likely be out-of-date tomorrow, but I found it useful as a
quick snapshot/overview of the Parrot repository.
http://www.lohutok.net/parrot.pdf (200k)
Sadly, it doesn't display in acrobat, but is fine in xpdf and
Preview.app. Here'
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Isom
# Please include the string: [perl #38405]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38405 >
I've made a patch that modifies config/gen/makefiles/root.in and a
couple others to sim
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Isom
# Please include the string: [perl #38407]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38407 >
A while back I noticed that hcf didn't crash parrot(apparently the bug
got optimized aw
Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a class of tests that module authors perform that end users
> are not expected to run. For example code coverage tests, spelling
> tests, coding style tests, etc. These tests are either prohibitively
> expensive or complicated or unpredictab
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #38406]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38406 >
I've spent too much time on this error, so I'm routing around it, but
I'd love to f
The trouble is, EVERYONE wants to add just one more little dependency
(me included *cough*Params::Util*cough*).
I'll make you a deal.
Write this up. Then exhaustively test it on every single Perl platform
(50ish?) and every Perl version back to 5.004, including a random
collection similarly w
20 matches
Mail list logo
