I've add simple install support for pkgconfig as r11035. It's currently
hardcoded as being under libdir as this is what every automake installed
package I know of does. If there's ever compelling reason to install it
someplace else we can add a separate 'pkgconfigdir' option for it.
Cheers,
-J
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
# Please include the string: [perl #38197]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38197 >
Using pkg-config and/or parrot-config to link against libparrot should
be discussed.
On 1/10/06, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:06:29AM +, Nick Glencross wrote:
> > Joshua Hoblitt (via RT) wrote:
> >
> > >Parrot should support pkgconfig by installing a pc data file. It should
> > >probably be named parrot.pc.
> > >
> > Ok, I can do this.
Kirrily Robert wrote:
Does anyone else find that SKIP: { } blocks bugger up the debugger?
I'll be happily bouncing on the "n" key to get to round about the
vicinity of the failing test, and then blam, it sees a skipped test and
just fast-forwards to the end.
K.
Yep
Actually, eval doe
On 1/10/06, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jonathan Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Note that dynamic op libs do not *work* on Win32 yet
> They do now - I'm using them with my .NET to PIR translator and they work
> nicely.
>
> I would really like some feedback from M
"Nick Glencross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/10/06, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would really like some feedback from MinGW and cygwin folks on how
> dynoplibs build and work for them
Works straight off on cygwin. :-) Gives the answers you wanted.
That's great, thank
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:52, Joshua Isom (via RT) wrote:
[ substr related PANIC ]
After a lengthy session with gdb and some added debug prints, I've now
tracked down and fixed the reason for the memory panic. The sweep code
tried to avoid freeing buffers, if there were
On 1/10/06, via RT Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
> # Please include the string: [perl #38197]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38197 >
>
>
> Using pkg-conf
On 1/10/06, Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/10/06, via RT Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
> > # Please include the string: [perl #38197]
> > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> > # https://rt.
On 1/9/06, via RT Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
> # Please include the string: [perl #38196]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38196 >
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I
On 1/9/06, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a side note, Parrot::Configure::Step is only partially tested and I'm
> rather nervous about messing with it until it has better test coverage.
>
i'll work on this now.
~jerry
I'd like to create a class that provides a bunch of assertion
methods, like Carp::Assert, etc. I want to have an object oriented
interface, so in some code I'm developing I would have:
use Devel::Assert;
my $tester = Devel::Assert->new( on_fail => carp ); # or on_fail
=> cluck, etc.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 08:11:43AM -0800, Matisse Enzer wrote:
> I'd like to create a class that provides a bunch of assertion
> methods, like Carp::Assert, etc. I want to have an object oriented
> interface, so in some code I'm developing I would have:
>
>
> use Devel::Assert;
> my $tes
By the way - I have also been looking at Test::Assertions
---
Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.matisse.net/ - http://www.eigenstate.net/
On Jan 10, 2006, at 8:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I suppose you could consider a source filter, but I couldn't recommend
that.
I am in fact considering using a filter, but it scares me - perhaps
because I have never done it before.
---
Ma
Hi,
As you know, I've been playing with Lua for some time now, and my
attempt to write a Lua compiler targetting Parrot has not been
completely unsuccessful, but it was quite some work.
Anyway, at some point I realized that PIR looks very much like Lua
bytecodes (which I had inspected at tha
Until r10938, string-to-integer conversion was possible even when the
string contained more than one space before the start of the integer.
Thanks, applied - r11042.
leo
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:44:45PM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> This isn't an answer to your question, but in general production is the
> environment in which your code will be exposed to the data and
> conditions which have had the least testing, and to which you will have
> the least access an
On 1/10/06, Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/10/06, Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/10/06, via RT Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > # New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
> > > # Please include the string: [perl #38197]
> > > # in the subject line
Matisse Enzer wrote:
The trick I want is that if my code is running in a production
environment (perhaps determined at compile-time) then I want my
Devel::Assert stuff to basically disappear. So the question is, what is
the lowest-impact way to do that?
This entry in BooK's use.perl journal mi
Hi Ben,
* Ben Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-10 18:20]:
>I'd make a slightly stronger statement than that: If you were
>congenitally insane, wilfully stupid or drunk, you could
>consider a source filter for this.
Depends. Additive filters that the same code can run without are
sane when used
Parrot 0.4.1 has been committed to pkgsrc. Anybody who uses pkgsrc,
feel free to try it and let me know if it works ok. The repository may
be browsed here:
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/lang/parrot
--
- Anders Nor Berle
The integer and floatval opcodes div, fdiv, and cmod now all throw a
E_ZeroDivisionError exception with the text "Divide by zero". JIT/i386
and JIT/ppc are also adapted accordingly.
Updates for Integer, Float, Complex, BigInt PMCs are welcome.
leo
Hi,
As of tonight, dynamic op librareis are now built as a standard part of the
Parrot build process, plus there are some tests for them.
Jonathan
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Isom
# Please include the string: [perl #38201]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38201 >
Given the code
.sub main :main
$N0 = 3.14
$P0 = new .Integer
$P0 = $N0
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay
# Please include the string: [perl #38202]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38202 >
see below.
~jerry
-- Forwarded message --
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL P
# New Ticket Created by Greg Bacon
# Please include the string: [perl #38200]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38200 >
The attached patch against r11052 adds a missing trailing comma so
parrot can configure a
"Greg Bacon (via RT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The attached patch against r11052 adds a missing trailing comma so
parrot can configure and build on Cygwin.
Seems someone with a commit bit has beaten your patch to it. ;-) Though
the "libparrot_is_shared" line seems to be gone altogether now
Dear Internists,
Could someone post two or three pointers to documentation that gives an
overview (and more) of how to use Pugs with embedded Parrot, use Parrot
"external" to Pugs, and other means of interaction of Pugs and Parrot:
PGE, ... ?
PeterS
FYI, the builtin types automatically shimmer based on assignment.
.sub main :main
$N0 = 3.14
$P0 = new .Integer
$P0 = $N0
$S0 = typeof $P0
print $S0
print "\n"
print $P0
print "\n"
.end
prints:
Float
3.14
The assignment of an N register causes the Intege
All~
Fear not this weeks summary will come out... just a bit late. I have
it half written, but my bed is calling oh so sweetly.
Night all,
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory."
-Stan Kelly-Bootle, The Devil's DP Dictionary
31 matches
Mail list logo