From: Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 23:53:51 -0600
On Jan 6, 2006, at 10:17 PM, Joshua Juran wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Alberto Simoes via RT wrote:
>
>> This needs some more discussion. If we look to Perl, for instance, it
>> doesn't have a
Bob Rogers wrote:
From: Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 23:53:51 -0600
On Jan 6, 2006, at 10:17 PM, Joshua Juran wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Alberto Simoes via RT wrote:
>
>> This needs some more discussion. If we look to Perl, for instance, it
Hi,
I've attached a patch I've put together that includes Nick Glencross' patch
in ticket #37303 and additional changes that allow for a shared DLL to be
built on Win32 using MS VC++. This has the happy side-effect of fixing the
issues with pbc_merge and dynamic classes (I guess this was one
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
# Please include the string: [perl #38183]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38183 >
The current smoke system submits HTML directly to the smoke server.
This is just begg
Jonathan,
This patch is ok with both dynamic and static libparrots on amd64/linux.
Cheers,
-J
--
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 10:29:34PM -, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've attached a patch I've put together that includes Nick Glencross' patch
> in ticket #37303 and additional change
I think it's prudent that OS.pmc's default copy() method behaves in the
same way as File::Copy::copy() as this is likely the lowest possible
common denominator across platforms (note that I said behavior, not
implementation). This is sufficient for the majority of file copy tasks
and will make pre
I'd appreciate a few volunteers to try out this patch and make sure that
it doesn't break building on your favourite platform.
A similar change to the one in dynclasses_pl.in may be required in
application directories at some point to run on certain win32 flavours
(e.g. mingw).
Cheers,
Nick
"Jonathan Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyway, leo asked me to send this to the list for other people to try out
first before it goes in. So, voila.
And test they did. Thanks, ci'd.
Jonathan
"Nick Glencross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd appreciate a few volunteers to try out this patch and make sure that
it doesn't break building on your favourite platform.
A similar change to the one in dynclasses_pl.in may be required in
application directories at some point to run on certain
On 1/8/06, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Nick Glencross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd appreciate a few volunteers to try out this patch and make sure that
> > it doesn't break building on your favourite platform.
> >
> > A similar change to the one in dynclasses_pl.in may
"Nick Glencross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks. The hints file was an old version, so this patch fixes that.
Thanks again, also ci'd (10976).
Jonathan
This is an attempt to summarize my thinking about the instruction
interface to dynamic binding and its interaction with the other
dynamically-scoped bits of Parrot. I am hoping to get feedback before
diving further into the implementation details.
Please let me know what you think. TIA,
Also, unless things have changed, multiple op dispatch cores are
built in standard Parrot. I'm behind on my reading the list, so
someone will correct me if I missed it, but last time I worked with
the code there were 5 cores, just for experimental reasons.
Ideally, for production the config will
13 matches
Mail list logo
