Stuart Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 29/12/05, Austin Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, is there a conceptual connection between imposing named argument
>> interpretation on pairs in an arg list and slurping up the end of a
>> parameter list? Are there other meanings of prefix:<*> t
# New Ticket Created by Alberto Simoes
# Please include the string: [perl #38072]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38072 >
Note that this patch does not fixes the failing tests added by Coke on
last commit,
On 12/30/05, Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stuart Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 29/12/05, Austin Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> So, is there a conceptual connection between imposing named argument
> >> interpretation on pairs in an arg list and slurping up the end of
Perl6ers,
What is the most commonly used development platform (os and machine) by
folks on this group?
PeterS
Steve Peters wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 09:50:49PM -0500, Peter Schwenn wrote:
I've spent a couple of days trying out Cygwin, MinGW, PXPerl, and other
Windows based contexts, i
On 12/30/05, Peter Schwenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the most commonly used development platform (os and machine) by
> folks on this group?
>
i can't answer that. i can tell you i use i386-win32-msvc, and
sometimes i386-linux-gcc. i know some others are using
x86_64-linux-gcc, ppc-darwin
The attached patch is functionally complete, but I still have a few
loose ends to nail down, so I thought it would be a good time to post it
for review. The issues are as follows:
1. It needs more higher-level documentation. Is compiler_faq.pod
the best place for this?
2. Binding 'fo
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38073]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38073 >
$ tclsh
% expr atan2(2,3)
0.588002603548
% expr fmod(2.3,.2)
0.1
% expr hypot(3.1,4.1
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38075]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38075 >
tcl's expr currently only supports unary and binary ops.
Adding ternary support can be
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38076]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38076 >
[expr] currently generates quite a bit of code for something like:
expr 1*2*3*4*5
Sinc
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38077]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38077 >
There is currently no way to determine your current directory from
within parrot.
A m
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38078]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38078 >
There is currently no way to change your current directory from
within parrot.
A meth
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38079]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38079 >
http://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.5/TclCmd/pwd.htm
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38080]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38080 >
http://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.5/TclCmd/cd.htm
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38074]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38074 >
$ tclsh # RIGHT
% expr fink()
unknown math function "fink"
$ make tclsh #WRONG
% expr
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38081]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38081 >
Add compiled TclComment objects, which do nothing other than generate
PIR comments with
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38082]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38082 >
http://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.5/TclCmd/pwd.htm
On Dec 30, 2005, at 20:54, Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
[expr] currently generates quite a bit of code for something like:
expr 1*2*3*4*5
Since all of those operators are constant, it should be possible to
have that expr call be distilled to:
.sub foo :anon
$P0 = new TclInt
$P0 = 120
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38084]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38084 >
proc already does compile, but immediately executes the sub.
should instead pass along
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38086]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38086 >
While expr is already acting as a compiler, it immediately executes
the generated PIR
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38087]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38087 >
convert [puts] to an inlined variant. This would be a good inline to
experiment with s
This is done as of r10803.
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #38088]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38088 >
While not necessary, it'd be nice from a debugging standpoint to
generate nicely for
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #38089]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38089 >
The PMC dependencies in the makefile should be more explicit.
*something* is causing
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #38090]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38090 >
Most builtins take a varying number of arguments, so it's hard to use
this there, bu
On Dec 30, 2005, at 17:50, Bob Rogers wrote:
The attached patch is functionally complete, but I still have a few
loose ends to nail down, so I thought it would be a good time to post
it
for review. The issues are as follows:
1. It needs more higher-level documentation. Is compiler_f
Please have a look at http://ali.as/pita/ [PITA - The Perl Image
Testing Architecture] and how we can use this for further/additional
Parrot platform testing.
Thanks,
leo
[Note: Posted to both perl6-language and perl6-documentation.
Since perl6-documentation is no longer advertised, I assume
follow ups should be posted to perl6-language only].
When Audrey gave a recent talk to Sydney.pm, she pointed out
some deficiencies in the current Pugs/Perl 6 documentation
and
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay
# Please include the string: [perl #38083]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38083 >
adjust the parrot test harness to fill I/N registers with garbage by
default. in other wor
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #38085]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38085 >
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #38098]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38098 >
There are two new [expr] operators in Tcl 8.5 that need to be added to
partcl: in an
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:17:39 +0100
On Dec 30, 2005, at 17:50, Bob Rogers wrote:
>The attached patch is functionally complete, but I still have a few
> loose ends to nail down, so I thought it would be a good time to post
> it
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 00:40 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> On Dec 25, 2005, at 23:48, Steve Gunnell wrote:
[snip]
>
> > When using the Read/Readline opcodes how do we specify what encoding is
> > to be assumed for the incoming string?
>
> There is one output encoding filter currently:
>
>po
32 matches
Mail list logo
