# New Ticket Created by Alberto Simoes
# Please include the string: [perl #38052]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38052 >
uses warning, strict, lib and so on, so you can use prove on all those
tests.
Cheer
Hi
I tried building parrot on Linux 2.4.20 and I get the following error
during gmake process. I have the default perl-5.8.6 built on my
system. Can anybody suggest me what this error is and how to overcome
this?
regards
Ravi Sastry
./parrot -o runtime/parrot/library/Stream/ParrotIO.pbc
runtime
And then ... ? Does Pugs see and invoke that Parrot available in PATH
without some explicit command or parameter when running PUGS?
Gaal Yahas wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:24:54PM -0500, Peter Schwenn wrote:
How does Pugs use Parrot "external" as opposed to "embedded"?
Have the parrot
"Audrey Tang (autrijus)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I am not sure how much (if any) of this should be cross-posted to P6C...
> Would the list subscribers be interested in getting them in email form,
> in addition to the current blog format?
It'd certainly make it easier for this summary
On 12/28/05, Sastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I tried building parrot on Linux 2.4.20 and I get the following error
> during gmake process. I have the default perl-5.8.6 built on my
> system. Can anybody suggest me what this error is and how to overcome
> this?
>
[snip extra build error i
# New Ticket Created by Alberto Simoes
# Please include the string: [perl #38057]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38057 >
--
Alberto Simões - Departamento de Informática - Universidade do Minho
Hello,
i am testing a module for a web application and i need to test the
expiration of sessions. The problem is that i can not modify the
expiration time and i not want to make sleep the test for the full
length of expiration time (a hour).
So, the natural solution appears to be mangling the s
On 28 Dec 2005, at 16:36, Javier Amor Garcia wrote:
Hello,
i am testing a module for a web application and i need to test the
expiration of sessions. The problem is that i can not modify the
expiration time and i not want to make sleep the test for the full
length of expiration time (a hour)
On 11/28/05, Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, one other thing for the renaming game:
>
> IMC vs. PIR
> Two names enter
> One name leaves
>
> /me giggles
this is now referenced in DEPRECATED (thanks to will,) and the
remaining .imc files in the parrot tree are quickly be
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
# Please include the string: [perl #38060]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38060 >
A quick demonstration of the issue:
--
#include
#include
int main ()
{
printf
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #38061]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38061 >
'make benchmark_tests' test whether the benchmark programs are
working. Currren
# New Ticket Created by Alberto Simoes
# Please include the string: [perl #38058]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38058 >
Please validate the tests, as the meaning of the 'last' third argument
wasn't the co
Hello all!
In reading S06 from the svn repository I had some questions about the
use of prefix:<*> in different contexts. When used in an argument list,
it forces pairs to be interpreted as named args. When used in a
parameter list, it causes slurpiness.
It seems to me like these are relat
Greg,
Can you send the post the output of `prove -v t/op/trans.t`? I suspect
that atan2() may be misbehaving on cygwin in the same way that it does
on Solaris.
-J
--
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 05:25:29PM -0600, Greg Bacon wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Joshua Hoblitt writes:
>
> :
On 29/12/05, Austin Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, is there a conceptual connection between imposing named argument
> interpretation on pairs in an arg list and slurping up the end of a
> parameter list? Are there other meanings of prefix:<*> that relate to
> one or the other of these two
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #38063]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38063 >
In [expr], partcl tries to convert both operands of every binary
operator to numbers
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #38064]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38064 >
When partcl unsets a variable, it breaks aliasing. Setting that variable
should set
17 matches
Mail list logo
