On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:17:16PM +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> The following causes PGE to infinite loop:
>
> "x" ~~ /[ [ x ]* ]*/
>
Thanks -- PGE doesn't yet handle repetitions of zero-length substrings.
It's on the TODO list; I worked on it a couple of weeks ago but had to
stop to re-think
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:09:19PM +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> What sort of match object should this return, supposing that it didn't
> infinite loop:
>
> "x" ~~ / [ [ (x) ]* ]* /
>
> Should $/[0][0] be "x", or should $/[0][0][0] be "x"? If it's the
> latter, then when do new top-level eleme
Thanks for all your helps.
I am new in Perl world, my situation is, for example:
- my modules, which I like to test, live in "tmp/experiment/lib" folder
- my test scripts, which are created to load and exercise the above modules,
live in "tmp/experiment/tests" folder
- I call our internal test h
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:33:42PM +0100, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering, is there a PDD about Thread implementation in Parrot? I
> searched the list archive, and found a lot of info. Dan even mentioned
> writing a PDD on the subject, but I havent' been able to find it.
This ques
On 12/26/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:09:19PM +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > "x" ~~ / [ [ (x) ]* ]* /
>
> As I understand things, $/[0][0] would be "x".
Hmm, that seems wrong. Consider:
"xxxyxxyxy" ~~ / [ [ (x) ]* (y) ]* /
I argue that by
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 07:34:06PM +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> On 12/26/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:09:19PM +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > > "x" ~~ / [ [ (x) ]* ]* /
> >
> > As I understand things, $/[0][0] would be "x".
>
> Hmm, that seems w
Hi Chris,
I am still confus.
For example,
On my Linux box, I have a module "/tmp/experiment/lib/module_to_test.pm" to be
tested, and I have two Perl unit test scripts "/tmp/experiment/tests/test1.pl"
and '"/tmp/experiment/tests/test2.pl" to load the module_to_test.pm module and
execute the su
> As a third possibility, could we huffman-code "do nothing" clauses by
> leaving out the appropriate argument? That is:
>
> while $x-- && some_condition($x);
That's a bit too short for my liking: it is likely to lead to the
traditional C undetectable bug when you write
while $x-- && some_cond
Luke,
Thank you very much - that should get me more than started.
One more pointer, an elaboration, (a general one to documentation one
relation of Pugs to embedded Parrot even better): if Pugs doesn't have a
feature yet, like much of Rules, does it ship it off to embedded Parrot
for potentia
How does Pugs use Parrot "external" as opposed to "embedded"?
(e.g. as expressed in:
CAVEATS FOR ALL USERS
-
Parrot is used to provide Perl6-style regular expressions.
Perl5-style regular expressions (eg, rx:perl5/foo/) can be used
without any parrot at all. Pugs can be buil
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #38028]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38028 >
Most are trivial, few are important.
Cheers
Alberto
--
Alberto Simões - Departame
Dear self,
I've since discovered the prior discussion of Pugs under Cygwin so I
know there's probably not yet a simple answer but enough of a work
around to go forward (building and using Pugs+Parrot+... under Cygwin.)
Peter Schwenn
Peter Schwenn wrote:
Perl6'ers
Under Cygwin (bash), while
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:47:08PM -0500, Peter Schwenn wrote:
> In order to Makefile.PL Pugs, what is the environment variable that
> points to GHC?
It just needs to be in your PATH. Make sure you have version 6.4.1 or a
recent development snapshot.
--
Gaal Yahas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://gaa
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:24:54PM -0500, Peter Schwenn wrote:
> How does Pugs use Parrot "external" as opposed to "embedded"?
Have the parrot executable in your path. Don't have "parrot" in the
PUGS_EMBED environment variable.
(TODO: move over PUGS_EMBED to the config.yml file.)
--
Gaal Yahas
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:00:11AM -0500, Peter Schwenn wrote:
> I've since discovered the prior discussion of Pugs under Cygwin so I
> know there's probably not yet a simple answer but enough of a work
> around to go forward (building and using Pugs+Parrot+... under Cygwin.)
We'll be very happy
Dear 6Compilers,
Cygwin isn't entirely happy with Parrot (don't know about Pugs). Is the
best approach on "plain" windows for setting up perl5+pugs+parrot to:
1. set up a gcc environment
2. get the tar.gz sources involved
3. use gcc's make tomake, make test, make install each
On Dec 25, 2005, at 3:46 PM, Scott Wang wrote:
I am new to use Devel::Cover.
We have lots of product Perl modules in our product "lib" folder
and we have lots of Perl test scripts to cover those modules, right
now, we are trying to get the code coverage metrics for our tests
on those modu
In order to Makefile.PL Pugs, what is the environment variable that
points to GHC?
Perl6'ers
Under Cygwin (bash), while building PUGS, Pugs' Makefile.PL (one of its
henchmen) needs an environment setting to say where a runnable 'ghc' can
be found. I have GHC installed (in its .msi incarnation as required) in
c:/cygwin/home/me/ghc
I tried:
setenv GHC=/home/me/ghc/bin
Hi all,
do we have any specifications for array introspection, or introspection
of data structures (including subroutines) in general? Say I have this
array:
my @array (1..9 --> Int);
I think I get the first bit with .shape; what about the Int? Since
arrays are glorified subroutines, per
On 12/23/05, Peter Schwenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear 6Compilers,
>
questions about the internals of parrot (including build/config
trouble) are best directed instead to the perl6 internals list, so
i've copied them on my response.
> Cygwin isn't entirely happy with Parrot (don't know about
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
# Please include the string: [perl #38023]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38023 >
Parrot should support pkgconfig by installing a pc data file. It should
probably be
Scott Wang wrote:
Hi Chris,
I am still confus.
For example,
On my Linux box, I have a module "/tmp/experiment/lib/module_to_test.pm" to be tested, and I have two Perl
unit test scripts "/tmp/experiment/tests/test1.pl" and '"/tmp/experiment/tests/test2.pl" to load
the module_to_test.pm module
James E Keenan wrote:
Scott Wang wrote:
Hi Chris,
I am still confus.
For example,
On my Linux box, I have a module
"/tmp/experiment/lib/module_to_test.pm" to be tested, and I have two
Perl unit test scripts "/tmp/experiment/tests/test1.pl" and
'"/tmp/experiment/tests/test2.pl" to load the
Hi James and Randy,
Thank you so much for your replies!
Yes, the modules that we are testing are not for
standard distribution. They are created by other folks
in my organization to support and to be part of our
current automated integration system. They are our
internal use. There already are ma
On 12/26/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I argue that by the structure of that rule, you should be able to tell
> > which xs go with which y.
> > ...
> > Is there a counterargument that I'm not seeing?
>
> I'd say that if you want a structured rule, it should be written
> that
On 12/22/05, Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:47:21PM +0100, Michele Dondi wrote:
> > Also I wonder if one will be able to push(), pop(), etc. array slices as
> > well whole arrays. A' la
> >
> > my @a=qw/aa bb cc dd ee/;
> > my $s=pop @a[0..2]; # or [0,2
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:10:45AM -0500, Rob Kinyon wrote:
: Creating an array whose positions are aliases for positions in another
: array can be useful. How about
:
: my @s := @a[0,2,4] is alias;
:
: @a[2] = 3; # @s[1] == 3
: @s[1] = 4; # @a[2] == 4
:
: The default slicing behavio
28 matches
Mail list logo
