Two core dumps... (r9297)

2005-10-02 Thread Nick Glencross
I haven't seen this mentioned on the list, and it might be widely known... on i386 linux there are two core dumps left behind after a make test. I believe one to be NCI related (japh_10.pasm). (gdb) where #0 0x0812f738 in clone_regs_interp (d=0x0, s=0x8276d88, dest=0x843ca98) at parrotinte

Re: [perl #37303] [PATCH] Relaxing parrot dependency on parrot_config

2005-10-02 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:26:21AM +0100, Nick Glencross wrote: > I'm not sure that the patch made it into RT. Here it is again, with a > small tweak to a Makefile dependency. It didn't make it in because I dropped the ball. Thanks for resubmitting. Cheers, -J -- pgp4ci9TRYeyH.pgp Descripti

Re: How to test an overloaded @{} operator?

2005-10-02 Thread Torsten Schoenfeld
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 14:40 -0700, chromatic wrote: > Does doing it in two steps work? Instead of: > > > is_deeply ($obj->get ('some_flags'), ['value-one', 'value-two']); > > perhaps: > > my @flags = @{ $obj->get( 'some_flags' ) }; > is_deeply( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [ 'value-one', 'value-two' ]

Re: How to test an overloaded @{} operator?

2005-10-02 Thread Torsten Schoenfeld
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 19:20 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > There's not really a mistake, more that if a given reference is overloaded > in several ways its not possible for Test::More to guess which one is the > canonical representation. Should this blessed, string and array overloaded > hash

Re: Two core dumps... (r9297)

2005-10-02 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Nick Glencross wrote: I haven't seen this mentioned on the list, and it might be widely known... on i386 linux there are two core dumps left behind after a make test. Well, there are several TODO tests, which execute and fail more or less deadly. That's it. I believe one to be NCI relate

[PATCH] Better support for libparrot.so

2005-10-02 Thread Nick Glencross
Guys, This preliminary patch aims to add better support for a shared libparrot library (don't apply it yet!). * First I've added config/inter/libparrot.pl to interactively prompt for whether a shared library should be built. This can be defaulted by platform hints (defaulting off for now, w

Re: Two core dumps... (r9297)

2005-10-02 Thread Nick Glencross
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Nick Glencross wrote: I haven't seen this mentioned on the list, and it might be widely known... on i386 linux there are two core dumps left behind after a make test. Well, there are several TODO tests, which execute and fail more or less deadly. That's it. Sorr

[perl #37325] [TODO] build - remove use of $(MAKE_C)

2005-10-02 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt # Please include the string: [perl #37325] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37325 > make needs to know when another instance of make is being invoked in order to manage

[perl #37324] [TODO] build - root.in makefile split-up

2005-10-02 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt # Please include the string: [perl #37324] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37324 > config/gen/makefiles/root.in already weighs in at 1581 lines. It needs to be divided

[perl #37323] [TODO] build - makefile dependencies

2005-10-02 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt # Please include the string: [perl #37323] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37323 > All build targets need to have properly declared dependencies. With the current stat

Re: How to test an overloaded @{} operator?

2005-10-02 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 01:42:05PM +0200, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote: > On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 14:40 -0700, chromatic wrote: > > > Does doing it in two steps work? Instead of: > > > > > is_deeply ($obj->get ('some_flags'), ['value-one', 'value-two']); > > > > perhaps: > > > > my @flags = @{ $ob

Re: threads

2005-10-02 Thread Jonathan Worthington
"Dave Frost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From the outset i decided i wanted the vm to provide its own threading mechanism i.e. not based on posix threads for example. Parrot had the option of providing its own threads, thread scheduling and the like. As leo mentioned, we're using OS threads. Th