Here's a good Perl 6 final exam question:
Spot the mistake (hint: it's not in the math):
module Complex;
sub i() is export {
Complex.new(0,1)
}
multi sub infix:<+> (Complex $left, Complex $right) is export {
Complex.new($left.real + $right.real, $left.imag + $rig
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 07:55:21 +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Here's a good Perl 6 final exam question:
>
> Spot the mistake (hint: it's not in the math):
>
> module Complex;
>
> sub i() is export {
> Complex.new(0,1)
> }
> multi sub infix:<+> (Complex $left, Complex $rig
On 9/4/05, Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always saw scoping of multis as something that applies to the
> variants...
>
> multi sub foo {
>
> }
>
> {
> my multi sub foo {
>
> }
>
>
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
# Please include the string: [perl #37067]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37067 >
This patch fixes a few typos, 81 char lines, and makes a couple of other
exceedingly
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
# Please include the string: [perl #37068]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37068 >
Hi,
I have add t/examples/japh.t, which tests the JAPHs in 'examples/japh'.
Cu
> > This patch fixes a few typos, 81 char lines, and makes a couple of other
> > exceedingly minor tweaks.
Thanks applied in r9136.
> I should have added that this patch does s/behaviour/behavior/g. Which
> brings up the issue of: which "English" are we using for docs?
That would be a questio
[...]
t/examples/japhNOK 2
# Failed test (t/examples/japh.t at line 49)
# got: 'tsuJona rehtraP torkcaHp
# r'
# expected: 'Just another Parrot Hacker
# '
t/examples/japhok 15/15# Looks like you failed 1 test of
15.
t/examples/japh
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 03:47 -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
> > I should have added that this patch does s/behaviour/behavior/g. Which
> > brings up the issue of: which "English" are we using for docs?
> That would be a question for Chip, or do we have a 'docs' pumkin?
For what it's w
Folks,
I recently needed to write a series of codes on lambda calculus in
perl. As MJD has shown Perl 5 can handle lambda calculus but I am
beginning to get tired of whole bunch of 'my $x = shift' needed.
our $ZERO =
sub { my $f = shift;
sub { my $x = shift; $x }};
our
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:35:36PM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote:
> And I found that these can be made much, much simpler and more
> intuitive with Perl 6, even more so than scheme!
>
> our $ZERO = sub($f){ sub($x){ $x }};
> our $SUCC = sub($n){ sub($f){ sub($x){ $f.($n.($f)($x)) }}};
> our $ADD
10 matches
Mail list logo
