On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:32:45AM -0400, Robert wrote:
> Is the inline POD the current preferred way?
That really depends on who you ask. Me? I prefer it. Its totally a matter
of style.
Pros:
* Keeps the docs close to the code so you're more likely to keep the docs up
to date.
* Docs tak
>> : so why not 'print($x)' == 'print ($x)' ;-)
> Plus we got rid of Perl-5's no-op unary +, so instead we're using
> whitespace to force it to be a list operator.
Thanks! I've got the idea.
I'd better refuse parenthesis than a space here. I think I'll never
drop space in a function call if it c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Friday 05 August 2005 17:32, Robert wrote:
> I am creating my first module (finally) and I was told a while ago to
> use Module::Starter. Which I did. I am fine there. When I look at the
> code generated I see that all the POD stuff is inline while I pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
robert, you need to work on your reply-to address :)
- -- Forwarded Message --
Subject: failure notice
Date: Saturday 06 August 2005 11:38
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at relay03.pair
Reading the blog of Geoff about the OSCON session
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/7523
I just remembered an open issue for me.
How do you test if an HTML page is in one of the w3 standards ?
There is the w3 validator online at http://validator.w3.org/ but I cannot use
that for my ongoing tests. I ne
* Gábor Szabó wrote:
>Reading the blog of Geoff about the OSCON session
>http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/7523
>I just remembered an open issue for me.
>
>How do you test if an HTML page is in one of the w3 standards ?
>There is the w3 validator online at http://validator.w3.org/ but I cannot use
>tha
On Aug 5, 2005, at 10:32 AM, Robert wrote:
Is the inline POD the current preferred way?
It is for me, which is why I wrote it that way.
Damian Conway, in the new book "Perl Best Practices," advocates
against it for a number of reasons, mainly because he doesn't want
order of subs in cod
Adrian Lambeck wrote:
So the question is: is that file installed properly to your --prefix
directory structure?
Maybe you are querying the wrong parrot too (the config paths and
settings gets compiled into the executable of parrot)?
It is installed properly and I am not querying but the pugs c
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #36820]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36820 >
PGE globbing doesn't seem to be accepting backslash as an escape: so,
there's no way (
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:32:45AM -0400, Robert wrote:
Is the inline POD the current preferred way?
That really depends on who you ask. Me? I prefer it. Its totally a matter
of style.
Pros:
* Keeps the docs close to the code so you're more likely to keep the d
On Saturday 06 August 2005 13:41, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Gábor Szabó wrote:
> >Reading the blog of Geoff about the OSCON session
> >http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/7523
> >I just remembered an open issue for me.
> >
> >How do you test if an HTML page is in one of the w3 standards ?
> >There is t
* Shlomi Fish wrote:
>It's nice, but I recall that with the same input file, it did not catch some
>problems that the W3C Validator then yelled at. (I don't recall what file it
>was, sorry).
Yes, Tidy won't report many errors, in particular such errors that are
easy to fix or different in HTML/X
Autrijus~
On 8/6/05, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Cc'ing p6l, but this feels like a p6c thread...)
>
> Greetings. As I'm moving forward with the new PIL runcore,
> I'm now trying to document my understanding as visual diagrams.
>
> The first one is about the compilation cycle:
>
(Cc'ing p6l, but this feels like a p6c thread...)
Greetings. As I'm moving forward with the new PIL runcore,
I'm now trying to document my understanding as visual diagrams.
The first one is about the compilation cycle:
http://pugscode.org/images/simple-compilation.png
The second one is abo
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:43:13PM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> The pictures are pretty and the compilation one makes a great deal of
> sense, but I must admit to being enitrely confused by the container
> one. I think part of the problem is that I don't have a good footing
> from which to understa
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 12:55:53AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Hm, I'm afraid there are not much material on this beyond the Synopses,
> so I'll try to describe that picture a bit.
>
...
>
> That's about it. :-) Hopefully my two questions will make more sense
> to you now...
Very nice descript
# New Ticket Created by Lambeck
# Please include the string: [perl #36818]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36818 >
Hi all,
in order to make mod_parrot-0.3 work with parrot-0.2.3 there need to be some
additio
> Fixed (r8839 / r8840).
>
> $ perl Configure.pl --prefix=/home/lt/src/p-0.2.3
> $ make && make install
> $ cd ~/src/p-0.2.3
> $ bin/parrot parrot-config.imc prefix
> /home/lt/src/p-0.2.3
>
> leo
Hi Leo,
maybe you are right but I can`t test it because:
1. jrieks got a conflict in the current svn
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #36823]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36823 >
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.4.21-27.0.2.elsmp
arch= i386-linux-thread-multi
cc=
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
There are still issues e.g. with namespaces. I've put out numberless
mails on p6i where I invited HLL folks to discuss it and make some
proposals. Guess how many answers these mails got.
Zero? I don't think p6i is the right place for that.
We should h
I just saw that this morning. I have no idea where that email address came
from as that is a real old address. I will have to check my settings when I
get back to work.
Robert
On 8/6/05 6:03 AM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Tels"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:32:45AM -0400, Robert wrote:
> I am creating my first module (finally) and I was told a while ago to
> use Module::Starter. Which I did. I am fine there. When I look at the
> code generated I see that all the POD stuff is inline while I prefer
> to see POD stuff at the en
Thanks for the answers.
Robert
"Patrick R.Michaud (via RT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Attempting to build parrot r8844 from a fresh subversion checkout
results in an error on my system (FC4):
$ perl Configure.pl; make
...
/usr/bin/perl build_tools/parrot_config_c.pl --mini > \
src/null_config.c
src/null_config.c
c++
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:52:41PM +0200, "TSa (Thomas Sandla�)" wrote:
> >And this is a natural extension to guide the inferencer so it won't be
> >totally giving up on polymorphic functions such as &id. C) and D) can
> >be taken together, resulting to a powerful soft typed language.
>
> This is
On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 05:03 -0700, Lambeck wrote:
> in order to make mod_parrot-0.3 work with parrot-0.2.3 there need to be some
> additions to src/call_list.txt . These statements are included in the patch.
>
> This patch is important because otherwise the users need to patch and
> recompile par
26 matches
Mail list logo
