On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:01:38 +0100, Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> It seems to me, that the way to get at all the instances of a class is to ask
> the Garbage Collector to do the heavy lifting for us, and ideally I'd like to
> see this exposed at the Perl level.
I'm going to hij
Piers Cawley wrote:
Let's say I have a class, call it Foo which has a bunch of attributes, and I've
created a few of them. Then, at runtime I do:
eval 'class Foo { has $.a_new_attribute is :default<10> }';
Assuming I've got the syntax right for defaulting an attribute,
I think you need a '
I wrote:
class Example
{
my %private_data;
my sub source {...};
has %.data;
has &.blahh = { %.data };
Should read $.blahh, &. would indicate codehood.
# and how about syntactic sugar for this:
has &.blubber from %.data;
Here also $.blubber. Sorry
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:32:32PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
>For the record, is it acceptable in Parrot to use page
> write-protection to record whether oldspace objects have been modified
> since the last full GC? This is what CMUCL does on most ports, but it
> occurs to me that this might b
David~
On 25 Jul 2005 04:02:44 -, David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm going to hijack this thread to discuss something else.
Speaking for summarizers everywhere. A! Damn you!
Matt
--
"Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal System
Nicholas Clark wrote:
This all got Warnocked, didn't it?
Having read it twice, I don't think I'm going to get closer to a decent
response than "er, this is really a call for the designer to make, isn't it?"
Mway be it's time to start a WARNOCKED file in parrot's root dir and
collect such und
Rather than adding another file, I'd recommend putting these under
DESIGN in docs/ROADMAP. Then they're all in one place for Chip when
he gets more tuits.
I added a link to this one there.
Regards.
On Jul 25, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Nicholas Clark wrote:
This all g
Uploading it here
Index: classes/resizablepmcarray.pmc
===
--- classes/resizablepmcarray.pmc (revision 8687)
+++ classes/resizablepmcarray.pmc (working copy)
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@
PMC* clone () {
PMC *copy = SUPER();
-
+
I'm looking for descriptions of the kinds of nodes in PIL. Below is
what I gathered from digging through the source code (Compile.hs and
Compile/PIR.hs). Could one of the lamdas correct the places where I'm
misinterpreting the code and fill in what's missing?
PNil A null v
Andy,
I have written a patch to approach the TODO item of "prove":
Shuffled tests must be recreatable
"prove" still works the same, but with extra options to control
--shuffle option.
prove --shuffle t # runs shuffled 't/*.t' scripts (as usual)
prove --shuffle --seed=808208 t # shu
I have forgotten to say that the patch is over the source code of
"bin/prove" in "Test-Harness-2.53_01.tar.gz".
Adriano.
http://qa.perl.org/test-modules.html has a bunch of test modules listed.
However, there are no harnesses listed. I know Test::Harness, and I'm
going to go read about Test::Builder, but what other "meta-testing"
modules are there?
Did anything ever happen with a distributed tester?
--Peter
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 06:10:38PM -0300, Adriano Ferreira wrote:
> I have written a patch to approach the TODO item of "prove":
>
> Shuffled tests must be recreatable
>
> "prove" still works the same, but with extra options to control
> --shuffle option.
>
> prove --shuffle t # runs s
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 11:53:01AM -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
> Thanks, applied.
Thanks! However, the rendered form is still of an old revision:
http://dev.perl.org/perl6/faq.html
Cheers,
/Autrijus/
pgp31aL1GpSEb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 7/25/05, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still digesting it (and trying to bone up on GC algorithms at the
> same time), but it does sound like it should work. I assume that
> "forall (p -> q)" above really means "forall (q0 -> q where q0 == p)",
> i.e. process all IGP entries from
From: Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:15:33 +0100
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:32:32PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
>For the record, is it acceptable in Parrot to use page
> write-protection to record whether oldspace objects have been modified
> since
From: Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:06:14 +0200
I am sorry not to have told everyone before, but I discussed with leo
on IRC and the scheme he originally envisionned is actually very close
to NLDC and more simple : simply do the NLD pass at the same
On 7/26/05, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for descriptions of the kinds of nodes in PIL. Below is
> what I gathered from digging through the source code (Compile.hs and
> Compile/PIR.hs). Could one of the lamdas correct the places where I'm
> misinterpreting the code and f
18 matches
Mail list logo
