On Jul 16, 2005, at 2:24, Nattfodd wrote:
Hi,
I've produced a new document on GMC (Generational Mark & Compact), the
GC I'm trying to implement as a Summer of Code project. It's called gmc
for dummies and I hope it's plainly understandable (if not, tell me so
and I'll try to make it better). I
From: "Nathan Gray"
| A good starting place is:
|
| http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/docs/other/porting_howto
Looks good ,thanks.
For those of you that have been here a while I suspect you do not notice,
but to me there seems to be no structure, no definitive place where one can
go and find e
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> On Jul 16, 2005, at 2:24, Nattfodd wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I've produced a new document on GMC (Generational Mark & Compact), the
>> GC I'm trying to implement as a Summer of Code project. It's called gmc
>> for dummies and I hope it's plainly understandable (if not, tell
Nattfodd wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
1) pmc_bodies have to be variable sized
Oh, I believed that we would use variable-sized pmc only if the gc
proved to work really well.
Well, with fixed sized bodies, we don't need the extra indirection.
But I really like to have a more flexible objec
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:14:24 +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Hmm, <~ and ~> for generic comparators? ;)
EEK!
i think <, <=>, >, == etc are enough for the ord and Eq class -
that's what most people overload in p5 anyway.
> > and Show
>
> That is already prefix ~ for that.
How do you describe
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:38:41 +0200
. . .
We keep the invariant by several means:
. . .
c) a write barrier checks pointer stores into aggregates (by just
comparing 2 memory addresses - basically)
we can do either:
- mak
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:14:24 +0800, Autrijus Tang
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:24:21AM +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote:
>> > There is a new generic comparison operator known as ~~.
>>=20
>> ~~ is just Eq, there is also Ord
>
> Hmm, <~ and ~> for generic comparators? ;
Gav,
Welcome aboard. You might also want to hop onto the #perl6 channel over
at irc.freenode.net it is where many of use spend way too much time,
and a great place for asking questions like these.
On Jul 16, 2005, at 9:03 AM, Gav wrote:
For those of you that have been here a while I suspe
# New Ticket Created by Dino Morelli
# Please include the string: [perl #36574]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36574 >
Added new allocation code for resizablebooleanarray. Added push_integer,
pop_integer, s
@Larry,
I have been reading up on method resolution orders and class precedence
lists and all sort of meta-model esoteria. Which brings me to ask
myself, "How should all this be done in Perl 6?".
The current state of the prototype meta-model is that it only supports
pre-order class traversal
On 16 Jul 2005 12:22:31 -, David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:14:24 +0800, Autrijus Tang
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:24:21AM +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> >> > There is a new generic comparison oper
On 7/16/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to have some coffee mugs thrown at me for saying this, but perhaps:
>
> Generic StringNumericIdentity
>+---+---++---+
> Equality |== |
Atmosphere: Whooosh
Mug: Clunk
Luke's head: Thud
Luke's wall: Dum
Luke: Ow
Violence is fun!
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 19:02:49 -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
> I'm going to have some coffee mugs thrown at me for saying this, but perhaps:
>
> Generic StringNumericIdentity
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
