On 6/27/05, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:20:07AM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> > > I'm perfectly happy to punt this problem over to B::Deparse and let them
> > > figure it out. As it stands B::Deparse is the best we can do with code
> > > refs. What's th
On 6/28/05, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:34:58PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> > Forgetting philosphical arguments about what's the right thing to do,
> > I think the strongest point against this is that there may be people
> > out there who expect the cur
Autrijus Tang wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:49:58AM +1000, Brad Bowman wrote:
Autrijus' journal mentions quasiquoting (Perl 5).
Yes... quasiquoting in Perl 5 is currently crudely emulated
by feeding things to PPI::Tokenizer and PPI::Transform. :-)
You're doing what now? :)
Just in cas
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #36407]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36407 >
The register allocator doesn't properly track control flow, if a label
has the same
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:19:20PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> >Yes... quasiquoting in Perl 5 is currently crudely emulated
> >by feeding things to PPI::Tokenizer and PPI::Transform. :-)
>
> PPI is not a code parser. By code parser I mean taking a string and
> turning it into working code. PPI i
Jerry Gay just brought up an idea that solves a frustration I ran into
yesterday. He and I are both subclassing existing PMCs and want to have
lots of tests, but copying and pasting them is fraught with peril.
In Perl 5, Test::Class makes it possible to share tests between test
files in an OO fas
All,
A quick sanity check of an API, if you'd be so kind. I'm working on a
series of modules to make sure that our production servers are built
correctly.
I'm just working on Test::User and Test::Symlink.
Test::User exports user_ok and homedir_ok.
user_ok(name => 'username', ..., 'Test na
Hello,
I am using pugs 6.2.7. Is it already possible to find out if a
subroutine
was called in a void context. Does the want function provide this
feature.
Gerd Pokorra
Isn't the register allocator pretty much minimized by the new architecture
implementation? My understanding was that only temporary variables could
benefit from it now. Perhaps the new changes aren't in effect yet? Just
curious.
On 6/28/05, via RT Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
hi,
I've been playing a bit with the new set_*/get_* ops that implement the
new calling conventions, according to pdd03.
If the number of passed arguments is larger than the number of
parameters the function takes, an exception is thrown (this is the
overflow case described in PDD03) (excep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So are you suggesting that Ponie be written in Perl 6 or Perl 5? If you
want to remain consistent with the self hosting approach and maximize
the Perl 5 userbase, the Ponie compiler Perl should be written in Perl
5, and thus self hosted as well via itself on Parrot. If
# New Ticket Created by Roger Browne
# Please include the string: [perl #36411]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36411 >
The following PIR (attached as "script.pir", and also included here)
fails under Parrot
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 03:24:51PM +0100, Clayton, Nik wrote:
> user_ok(name => 'nik', uid => 1000, shell => '/bin/tcsh',
> 'Check nik\'s account');
My only thought is I would use a hash ref.
user_ok( { name => 'nik', uid => 1000, shell => '/bin/tcsh' },
"
All~
Although all tests pass, a core file is created during the test run.
Here is a little snippet from GDB. I am running a fairly stock Debian
Testing x86 (slightly out of date).
(gdb) list
1006INTVAL
1007PIO_putps(theINTERP, PMC *pmc, STRING *s)
1008{
1009ParrotIOLayer *l
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-06-21 through 2005-06-28
All~
Long time no see... err, write... uh, read... um... this. Yeah, long
time no this. As Piers hinted, two weeks ago I moved. Moving sucks. For
those of you who care, I am still in Cambridge, for those of you who
care more, I t
On Jun 28, 2005, at 17:14, Bill Coffman wrote:
Isn't the register allocator pretty much minimized by the new
architecture
implementation? My understanding was that only temporary variables
could
benefit from it now. Perhaps the new changes aren't in effect yet? Just
curious.
The register al
On Jun 28, 2005, at 17:23, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
hi,
I've been playing a bit with the new set_*/get_* ops that implement
the new calling conventions, according to pdd03.
If the number of passed arguments is larger than the number of
parameters the function takes, an exception is thrown (
17 matches
Mail list logo
