Vladimir Lipsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> class_count_mutex is used without having been initialized. The fixes that.
Thanks, applied - r8198
leo
Hello,
I'm having a seriously good time porting Maypole to Perl 6. If you
still have reservations about how Perl 6 is going to be to program in,
I urge you to try programming in it.
Now, commercial over, I have some questions.
What's the syntax for declaring inherited anonymous classe
> You'd probably need to pull a later version from hs-plugin's darcs
> repository:
>
> http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/code/hs-plugins
ok, thank for advice, now I'm in process of installing this.
However even with elder hs-plugins parrot and perl support was installed
fine; (looks like I o
# New Ticket Created by Curtis Rawls
# Please include the string: [perl #36026]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36026 >
The first patch (optimizer.patch) does
cleanup/refactoring/improvements to the strength
Hi,
the attached patch shows a problem with chomp.
Output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/projekte/pugs$ ./pugs -Iblib6/lib
t/builtins/strings/chomp.t
1..12
ok 1 - our variable is chomped correctly
ok 2 - our variable is chomped again with no effect
ok 3 - our variable is chomped correctly
ok 4 - our variab
Hi,
Simon Cozens wrote:
> I'm having a seriously good time porting Maypole to Perl 6. If you
> still have reservations about how Perl 6 is going to be to program in,
> I urge you to try programming in it.
> Now, commercial over, I have some questions.
:)
> class Foo {
> has Cla
Hi,
Yuval Kogman wrote:
> We have a pretty complex declarative language for argument
> processing in the parameter declaration:
[...]
> arity as a number does not give enough reflection into these
> properties.
Indeed.
> Are signatures going to be an exposed first class object in Perl 6?
I hope
Hi,
while responding to nothingmuch++'s post "function signatures?", I
thought that it'll be great if Code objects were fully introspectable.
I.e.:
&foo.statements; # List of statements
&foo.statements[0] # First statement
&foo.statements[2] = ...;# Statement modif
Curtis Rawls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first patch (optimizer.patch) does
> cleanup/refactoring/improvements to the strength_reduce() function in
> optimizer.c .
Thanks, applied - 8203
NB: some more come to my mind:
add I0, 1 => inc I0
add N0, 1.0 => inc N0
sub I0, 1 => dec I0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ingo Blechschmidt) writes:
> I think the only thing you're missing are two braces:
> $.request_class = class is Foo::Request {};
Thank you; then how do I put methods into $.request_class?
--
"I will make no bargains with terrorist hardware."
-- Peter da Silva
Hi,
Simon Cozens wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ingo Blechschmidt) writes:
>> I think the only thing you're missing are two braces:
>> $.request_class = class is Foo::Request {};
>
> Thank you; then how do I put methods into $.request_class?
$.request_class = class is Foo::Request {
method
Tcl has a need to be able to convert between Lists and Strings. All of the
morphing samples that are in, say, PerlUndef are for scalars.
Right now, I have a PIR method, "_Tcl::__stringToList" that takes a string,
and then uses the tcl parser to split it up into a list.
What I'd like to do i
The problem is that if you do
loadlib "/home/rogers/foo/bar/baz"
Parrot_load_lib finds and loads "/home/rogers/foo/bar/baz.so" just fine,
but then the library isn't initialized properly because it attempts to
look up the address of "Parrot_lib_/home/rogers/foo/bar/baz_load" via
dlsym,
On May 26, Patrick R. Michaud said:
N backtracking fails completely
N remove what matched up to this point from the
string
N we must be after the pattern P
N we must NOT be after the pattern P
N we must be before the
This patch prevents from an attempt to add a NULL PMC_EXT structure to the
pmc ext pool while in dod sweep run.
dod.c.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 01:08:58PM -0400, vadim wrote:
> While 'pugs' binary is a bit larger than 7Mb, 'pugs' with support of
> parrot and perl is only a bit smaller than 20M. Am I understanding
> correctly that both Perl and Parrot get statically built into binary?
That is correct.
Thanks,
/Autr
As soon as I have finished with PXPerl 5.8.6-2 (with Pugs 6.2.5 and
Parrot 0.2.0), I'll try to handle this =)
On 5/28/05, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:24:13PM +0200, Gr?oire P?n wrote:
> > "make install" with Pugs creates a pugs.exe.bat file in Perl bin
> >
> > While 'pugs' binary is a bit larger than 7Mb, 'pugs' with support of
> > parrot and perl is only a bit smaller than 20M. Am I understanding
> > correctly that both Perl and Parrot get statically built into binary?
>
> That is correct.
thanks!
BTW it is quite convenient to have an independent
On 5/29/05, Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while responding to nothingmuch++'s post "function signatures?", I
> thought that it'll be great if Code objects were fully introspectable.
>
> I.e.:
> &foo.statements; # List of statements
> &foo.statements[0]
Nested packfile segments of type directory are freed twice by
default_destroy(). The first time it happens in directory_destroy(), and the
second time in PackFile_Segment_destroy(). This behavior is, of course,
incorrect, the patch fixes it.
packfile.c.patch
Description: Binary data
Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
Are signatures going to be an exposed first class object in Perl 6?
I hope so, too.
~&foo.signature;
# Signature objects should stringify to a canonized form, e.g.:
# ~sub (Str $bar, CoolClass $z where {...}) {...}.signature ==>
# 'Str $bar, ANONCLASS(0xDEADBEEF)
[This is a repost, somehow it didn't get through before, sorry.]
Luke wrote:
> Both transparent dereferencing (infinite $$foo) and
> opaque dereferencing (one-level $$foo) have their uses, but they are
> definitely distinct.
Well, they are more like variations on a theme.
> Instead of adding d
22 matches
Mail list logo
