Ofer Nave wrote:
Well, I'm just starting to write tests now. Once I'm comfortable with
that, in the future I can try writing the tests first. But the module
is already written, and I've already posted it many other places to get
feedback on design and implementation. It's not very complicated
It's really nice to have the desk cluttered with 3 PCs. I ran
t/dynclass/pyint_1.imc parallel through gdb and tried to track down, why
it segfaults on OS X.
Eventually I found this:
$ grep -2 parents dynclasses/pynci.dump
linux/i386:
'class' => 'PyNCI',
'parents' => [
'NCI',
'PyFunc
Autrijus
This patch un-TODOs the t/op/push.t, t/op/auto.t tests as well as
restors the kwid docs in Test.pm
- Steve
pugs-2005-03-05-n1.patch
Description: Binary data
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:17:03PM -0500, Stevan Little wrote:
> I have managed to track down two different bugs/issues with PUGS. I
> explain them here in detail with examples, and todo_* tests for them
> are included in the following test files:
> t/op/shift.t
> t/op/pop.t
> t/op/push.t
>
Hola.. This test ensures that anon blocks not only parse, but
actually run, and also tests for the implicit semicolon bug.
--
() Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0xEBD27418 perl hacker &
/\ kung foo master: /me tips over a cow: neeyah!!
Auto-merging (0, 5) /pugs to /mirr
I've updated Test::WWW::Mechanize to add get_ok() and follow_link_ok()
methods. If you've been writing
$mech->get( $url );
ok( $mech->success, 'Fetched home page' );
you can now do that as
$mech->get_ok( $mech->success, 'Fetched home page' );
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 06:19:37PM +0200, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> Hola.. This test ensures that anon blocks not only parse, but
> actually run, and also tests for the implicit semicolon bug.
Thanks, applied. The execution has been fixed, and implicit
semicolon will be, soon.
Thanks,
/Autrijus/
p
I just got back from JOIN (Jornadas de Informatica) 2005, a little student
run conference at the University of Minho in Portugal. Why this might be
of interest is its the same place and largely the same folks who will be
running YAPC::Europe.
http://natura.di.uminho.pt/join2005/out/news_en.html
I
This patch un-TODOs a bunch of tests
pugs-2005-03-05-n2.patch
Description: Binary data
Autrijus,
This patch adds some tests for subroutines and specifically their
return values. The last set of tests is for the issue I described
earlier where a sub which returns a list ref does not work correctly
(it returns the last element in the list basically).
- Steve
pugs-2005-03-05-n3.p
folks,
Attached is a patch to Devel::Size which computes CV / coderef sizes.
It includes some bad/place-holder pod.
Feedback (off this list) is welcome.
tia
Jim Cromie
patch.dsize.60_06.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
Fri Mar 4 19:51:51 IST 2005 Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Basic test for try { CATCH {} }
No good examples in exegis/apocalypse
Only does CATCH (no other constructs, no default)
Does not tests 'use fatal' stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
New patches:
[Basic test
Fri Mar 4 20:06:00 IST 2005 Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Add myself to AUTHORS file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
New patches:
[Add myself to AUTHORS file
Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>**20050304180600] {
hunk ./AUTHORS 34
+Yuval Kogman (NUFFIN)
}
Context:
[
Fri Mar 4 20:22:02 IST 2005 Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Array intepolation is str context
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
New patches:
[Array intepolation is str context
Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>**20050304182202] {
hunk ./t/op/string_interpolation.t 14
- -plan 4;
Yuval Kogman writes:
> Fri Mar 4 20:06:00 IST 2005 Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Add myself to AUTHORS file
Thanks, applied.
Luke
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
It's really nice to have the desk cluttered with 3 PCs. I ran
t/dynclass/pyint_1.imc parallel through gdb and tried to track down, why it
segfaults on OS X.
Eventually I found this:
$ grep -2 parents dynclasses/pynci.dump
linux/i386:
'class' => 'PyNCI
Autrijus,
This patch has
- Added ChangeLog info for 6.0.10 (hope this cover it well)
- un-TODO-ed tests in t/op/shift.t
- Fixed a misunderstanding regarding list flattening in t/op/unshift.t
and t/op/push.t
Enjoy,
- Stevan
pugs-2005-03-05-n4.patch
Description: Binary data
Fri Mar 4 21:35:24 IST 2005 Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Test for assignment (parse?) bug
Assignment of already declared var differs from assignment during
declaration.
The latter is broken, seemingly with weird context or percedence issues.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
HaloO Larry,
you wrote:
One can view the auto-coercion as a form of MMD if you allow the
autogeneration of any necessary coercion methods. However, it's not
exactly a coercion to Str or Int--it's more like promotion to a Scalar
that is able to pretend it is either Str or Int. Or you can view it
a
Luke Palmer wrote:
And in fact, one of the big questions that's always in the back of my
mind (that I'm not searching for an answer to, but I'm always observing
for one) is: what do @ and % mean these days?
Another idea: they define the subsystem of the type system that uses
structural subtyping as
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 21:12 +0100, Thomas Sandlaß wrote:
> The roles themself beeing the least member of these classes---uninstanciable
> "pure"
> behaviour. The intersection type/role A&B is multiple inheritance (or is that
> "roling"?):
I don't understand the question (I don't recognize the wo
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:48:06 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. I've duplicate jit/ppc/asm.s to jit/ppc/ppc-linux.s, removed the
> leading underscore and the register name prefixes.
>
> config/auto/jit.pl should now use this file for the platform
> "ppc-linux".
Can someone th
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:24:30 -0500, Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:48:06 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok. I've duplicate jit/ppc/asm.s to jit/ppc/ppc-linux.s, removed the
> > leading underscore and the register name prefixes.
> >
> > config
HaloO chromatic,
you wrote:
I don't understand the question (I don't recognize the words "lubs" or
"glbs", for example), but I don't think this has anything at all to do
with multiple inheritance.
Sorry, that was given only in the picture:
lub = least upper bound (also known as supremum)
glb = gr
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 16:24 -0500, Matt Diephouse wrote:
> Can someone that #32514 can be closed?
>
> https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=32989
Yes, close it.
> And #27414 along with it:
>
> https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27414
I don't see the failures (and have
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #34340]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34340 >
OS X build isn't quite right. darwin hints defines "platform_asm", but this
file isn't
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 11:47:31AM -0600, Ken Williams wrote:
> Better would be to snark it from ExtUtils::CBuilder, which has a
> has_compiler() method.
How portable is this? I see there's some minimal VMS and OS/2 code in
there, will it work?
If so then the MakeMaker tests can just use have_c
I wrote:
A|B lub (lowest upper bound)
/ \
/ \
A 0 B
/ \ / \
/ \ / \
/ A&B \ glb (greatest lower bound)
/ 1 / \ 2 \
/ / 3 \ \
I was a bit
On Mar 4, 2005, at 4:07 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 11:47:31AM -0600, Ken Williams wrote:
Better would be to snark it from ExtUtils::CBuilder, which has a
has_compiler() method.
How portable is this? I see there's some minimal VMS and OS/2 code in
there, will it work?
It s
Michael G Schwern wrote:
I was asked to give something about testing to an audience of undergraduate
informatics students, largely Haskell and maybe some Java. What I finally
came up with is this:
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/talks/Why_Test/
Liked the emphasis on version control. Had to learn
There are two todo tests in given.t that have # in their desc string,
which is confusing 'make test'. Here's a diff to remove the #s, so they
no longer show up as failing.
-garrett
Index: t/base/given.t
===
--- t/base/given.t
Test::Output 0.05 has been released.
The main difference in this version is a patch from chromatic (thank
you). His patch fixed a bug where all tests printed error diags even if
they passed. Additional tests were added to ensure that no output is
sent from diag in successful tests.
While releas
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 06:51:41PM -0500, James E Keenan wrote:
> Liked the emphasis on version control. Had to learn Subversion as part
> of working in Phalanx project -- and had to learn Test::More much
> better. Glad I did both.
While I tried to keep the talk focused on just testing I found
Shawn Sorichetti wrote:
Test::Output 0.05 has been released.
The main difference in this version is a patch from chromatic (thank
you). His patch fixed a bug where all tests printed error diags even
if they passed. Additional tests were added to ensure that no output
is sent from diag in success
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:27:07PM -0800, Ofer Nave wrote:
> Random thought: Could Devel::Cover be automatically run against all
> modules in CPAN, with ratings posted on cpan.org right next to the usual
> test results?
It still chokes on certain not uncommon constructs like threads.
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:27:07PM -0800, Ofer Nave wrote:
Random thought: Could Devel::Cover be automatically run against all
modules in CPAN, with ratings posted on cpan.org right next to the usual
test results?
It still chokes on certain not uncommon constructs
Abe Timmerman wrote:
Random thought: Could Devel::Cover be automatically run against all
modules in CPAN, with ratings posted on cpan.org right next to the usual
test results?
Looking for something like this:
http://pjcj.sytes.net/cpancover/
(The link is available from http://qa.perl.o
I'm having some trouble using the &?SUB variable in a subroutine
declared with the -> operator. The following code results in an error
about &?SUB being undefined:
my $s = -> $count {
if $count < 10 {
say $count;
&?SUB($count + 1);
}
};
$s(1);
If I change to either a named sub (sub
Garrett Rooney writes:
> There are two todo tests in given.t that have # in their desc string,
> which is confusing 'make test'. Here's a diff to remove the #s, so they
> no longer show up as failing.
Thanks, applied.
Luke
Garrett Rooney writes:
> I'm having some trouble using the &?SUB variable in a subroutine
> declared with the -> operator. The following code results in an error
> about &?SUB being undefined:
>
> my $s = -> $count {
> if $count < 10 {
> say $count;
> &?SUB($count + 1);
> }
> };
>
Luke Palmer wrote:
That's because a pointy sub is not a sub. Perhaps we should call it a
pointy block.
That might be clearer ;-)
Not all code objects are Subs. If you call "return", then you return
from the innermost enclosing "sub", which is marked by that word.
Likewise does $?SUB. I don't bel
Garrett Rooney writes:
> >Not all code objects are Subs. If you call "return", then you return
> >from the innermost enclosing "sub", which is marked by that word.
> >Likewise does $?SUB. I don't believe $?BLOCK has been implemented yet,
> >but it will.
>
> If that's the case then the "Pointy su
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:44:42PM -0800, Ofer Nave wrote:
> Is it possible to tell quasi-reliably if the code in question uses
> threads and skip it? On that note, is forking also problematic?
Not really. Anywhere within the test or any code called by the test might
use threads. Devel::Cover
There are two unexpected successes in given.t (it must be my night for
finding things with that file...), but unfortunately they're not because
pugs is magically doing the right thing, they're because it's doing the
wrong thing in a way that exactly matches what the test is looking for,
if you
Garrett Rooney writes:
> There are two unexpected successes in given.t (it must be my night for
> finding things with that file...), but unfortunately they're not because
> pugs is magically doing the right thing, they're because it's doing the
> wrong thing in a way that exactly matches what th
Fri Mar 4 20:59:46 IST 2005 Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Bug in test: conditional of expected value was not working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
New patches:
[Bug in test: conditional of expected value was not working
Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>**20050304185946] {
Yuval Kogman writes:
> Fri Mar 4 20:59:46 IST 2005 Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Bug in test: conditional of expected value was not working
Thanks, applied. Kept Garrett's change in the conflict.
Luke
Since the first thing I actually tried to do with Pugs was to use the
%hash.kv method (see S04.pod) to iterate over the keys and values in a
hash, and it of course didn't work since it hasn't been implemented yet,
I figured I should at least send in a test for it.
Here's a diff to t/op/hash.t a
Garrett Rooney writes:
> Since the first thing I actually tried to do with Pugs was to use the
> %hash.kv method (see S04.pod) to iterate over the keys and values in a
> hash, and it of course didn't work since it hasn't been implemented yet,
> I figured I should at least send in a test for it.
It seems that the loop statement currently doesn't let you declare
variables inside it, so the following code:
loop (my $i = 0; $i < 10; $i++) { }
doesn't work. Here's a test for the problem.
-garrett
Index: t/base/loop.t
===
--- t/
Garrett Rooney writes:
> It seems that the loop statement currently doesn't let you declare
> variables inside it, so the following code:
>
> loop (my $i = 0; $i < 10; $i++) { }
>
> doesn't work. Here's a test for the problem.
Thanks, applied.
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:04:16AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
: The double evaluation bug has been fixed today. It was result of a
: misunderstanding of the role of $_ when the subroutine body does
: not mention $_, but makes use of slurpy arrays (as is the default with
: @*_), and has no invocan
Pugs 6.0.10 should be available on a CPAN near you soon; you may
also download it from:
http://autrijus.org/dist/Perl6-Pugs-6.0.10.tar.gz
Again, much kudos on the #perl6 / p6c team for making it happen. :)
Thanks,
/Autrijus/
[Changes for 6.0.10 - March 5, 2005]
Pugs Internals:
* Massive -
Ofer Nave wrote:
Shawn Sorichetti wrote:
Test::Output 0.05 has been released.
Renaming thread since only the OP referred to Test::Output.
It occurs to me that the Test::* and ExtUtils::* modules should be the
first stop for the Phalanx project. :)
At least as originally proposed by project lead
It occurs to me that the Test::* and ExtUtils::* modules should be the
first stop for the Phalanx project. :)
That's why there are a bunch of 'em listed up at the top of the P100.
Incidentally, is it acceptable for an author to Phalanx-review his own
module
Sure, but you should be doing that any
At least as originally proposed by project leader Andy Lester, Phalanx
was supposed to focus on *non-core*,
Not exactly. I just figured it's easier for teams to submit tests back
to individual authors than back to Perl itself. Also, those patches
are more likely to get out into the mainstream,
56 matches
Mail list logo
